FTSE

Ugly European Price Charts (Bespoke)


Wednesday, July 13th, 2011

by Bespoke Investment Group

After bouncing nicely over the last two weeks following somewhat of a resolution to the Greece debacle, European markets have taken it on the chin this week as problems continue to spread.  Below are the six month stock market price charts of three European Union countries that are also G7 countries — Italy, France, and Germany.  As shown, at its lows today, Italy’s FTSE MIB was down 15.3% from its high on July 1st!  France’s CAC 40 was down 7.5% in three days at its lows today, and Germany’s DAX was down 7% over the same time period.  The post-Greece bounce for Italy has been wiped out and then some in recent days, while Germany and France are now right back to where they started before the bounce.

On another note, Brazilian equities continue to plummet.  The country’s major stock market index — the Bovespa — is now down 13.83% as we noted in our prior post, and the index is down 6.5% since July 4th.  As shown below, the Bovespa is mired in a nasty long-term downtrend, and its current six-day losing streak has moved it to new six-month lows.  So far, the announcements that Brazil would be hosting the 2014 World Cup and the 2016 Summer Olympics haven’t done much to boost equity markets, that’s for sure.

 

Copyright © Bespoke Investment Group

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Brazil, Markets | Comments Off


Investing in Range-bound Markets


Tuesday, December 15th, 2009

This article is a guest contribution by Vitaliy Katsenelson*, Portfolio Manager and Director at Investment Management Associates in Denver, CO.

December 15, 2009

In the bull market that preceded the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the financial crisis, equity valuations reached some very frothy levels.

The correction that followed lasted only until March, and since then the S&P 500 index and the FTSE Eurofirst 3000 have risen more than 60%. Even in spite of the post-Lehman correction, equity markets have been in a secular range-bound phase since 2000.

Investors must understand the dynamics of range-bound markets and the best ways of investing in such an environment.

Secular market cycles

Let me lay out my thesis for secular (long-term, longer than five years) market cycles.

Ask an investor what the stock market will do over the next decade, and he’ll tell you his expectations for the economy and earnings growth, and that will turn into his projection for the market. However, this kind of thinking looks at the half of the equation that explains stock market (and individual stock) returns, while completely ignoring a very important variable that is responsible for a significant part of stock returns: valuation.

Mathematically, stock prices in the long run (not minutes or days, but years) are driven by two factors: earnings growth and (it’s a very important and) changes in valuation (P/E ratios). Once you add a return from dividends, you’ve captured all the variables responsible for total return from stocks.

During the last two centuries, every time we had a long-lasting bull market the market what followed was not a bear but a range-bound, sideways market. (The only notable exception was the decline during the Great Depression.) This happened not because of some hidden, embedded magical pattern. No, there is no practical joke being played on gullible humans; it happens because our emotions get the best of us. Yes, emotions! Secular bull markets start at low, below-average P/Es. A combination of earnings growth and P/E expansion (which is a simple reversion towards the mean) bring spectacular returns to now jubilant investors.

Then the investors get overexcited about stocks and drive valuations (P/Es) to above- average levels.

P/E expansion is a powerful tailwind and a significant source of the returns during secular bull markets, but high P/Es can create a headwinds. When they start to fall, they curtail returns during secular range-bound markets. As P/Es stop expanding at the very late stages of a secular bull market, investors who were accustomed to above- average returns grow less than thrilled with lower rates of return. The higher the P/Es, the more difficult it is for stocks to continue to climb, as earnings growth alone cannot keep the secular bull market going. Returns from stocks decelerate to below the levels investors have learned to expect, and investors gradually migrate from stocks to other asset classes.

Welcome to a range-bound market!

Emotions now shift into reverse. P/E compression is like gravity pulling stocks down, where earnings growth is the force that counteracts its effects. All the benefits from earnings growth are gradually offset by constant P/E compression (the staple of range- bound markets). P/Es mean-revert from above to average to below-average levels. Stocks go nowhere for a long, long time in the process.

I discuss this topic in great detail with plenty of charts and tables on my Contrarian Edge website.

US equity markets remain locked in a range-bound state

In the US, economic performance has not been significantly different during range- bound and bull markets. That is, as long economic performance was not far from its average state we had either range-bound or bull markets. However, when you coupled high (above-average) valuations with long-term economic contraction, you had a secular bear market. This is exactly what took place during the Great Depression (and has taken place in Japan from the late 1980s until today).

In secular bear markets, economic growth does not offset a price/earnings (P/E) mean reversion; declining earnings add fuel to the fire and supersize the decline in P/E, thus causing stock prices to decline over a protracted period of time.

In the last (1982-2000) secular bull market P/Es reached their highest level ever. Today, nine years into a range-bound market, US stocks are still at above-average valuations. If over the next few years the US economy doesn’t achieve positive nominal earnings growth, we may slide into a secular bear market.\

The Fed is throwing an enormous amount of liquidity into the economy, yet it has very few tools to deal with deflation (you can make borrowing virtually costless, but borrowers may still choose not to borrow or to spend). The Fed is much better equipped to fight inflation: it can make money very expensive, and expensive money curbs spending. Thus, historically the Fed was willing to err on the side on inflation – be it in consumer prices, housing, commodities, or the stock market (“Bubbles-R-Us”). (In part we are paying today for the Fed’s handling of the 2001 recession: Alan Greenspan took interest rates to a very low level and kept them there for too long, starting a bubble in real estate.)

Advertisement


Current Fed actions may have the unintended consequence of promoting another bubble in stocks. I believe it will be harder to achieve a broad market bubble, since the more you stimulate the less effective stimulus becomes, over time; but I can see how a few sectors may (and already have) bubbled up.

The Fed and politicians will likely err on the side of overstimulating the economy, as the career risk for taking the economy back into recession through constrictive monetary policy is too great.

The exit strategy from a range-bound market

Will my observations continue to play out in the future?

In my book Active Value Investing: Making Money in Range-Bound Markets (Wiley, 2007), I inadvertently created a framework that explains the mechanism behind stock market cycles. As things change over time one thing remains the same: our emotions will make us overexcited about stocks, and this will drive stocks to above-average levels, giving us cause to be underexcited (I think I just made up a new word), which will result in treacherous periods of range-bound markets.

If it were not for our emotions, stocks would always hew very close to their value levels (a normalized P/E of 15) and secular market cycles would not occur. I am oversimplifying; but if it were not for emotions, returns from stocks during short, intermediate, and long-term periods would be identical to their earnings growth.

Human emotions don’t let valuations (P/Es) remain in their average state of 15, and so they are driven to extremes, on both sides of the mean. Returns from stocks over short (one year) and intermediate terms (5, 10, or 15 years) may have a significant disconnect from their earnings growth. And the disconnect between earnings growth and stock market returns may persist for decades, or even longer.

Over, say, thirty years in the US (it takes that long for bull and range-bound markets to cancel out each other), returns from stocks will be in line with economic growth.

The role of technical analysis and market timing

About a month after my book came out I regretted its subtitle, “Making money in range- bound markets.”. People assumed that I knew what the range was, and the name also implied that I use technical analysis. “Sideways markets” would have been a more accurate description, but what’s done is done.

Secular market cycles are full of many cyclical bull and bear markets; the last range- bound market, which started in 1966 and ended 1982, had five cyclical bull and five cyclical bear markets. It is impossible to succeed at short-term market timing, as you have to get two things right: the short-term economic numbers and the market’s response to them, which in many cases may be irrational.

What I propose in the book (and practice at my firm) is active value investing. Instead of being a market timer, I’m a buy-and-sell investor, with a focus on valuing individual stocks.

Positioning against a decline in the dollar

Though problems in the US are well-known, I am not a long-term dollar bear (though, as a hedge, we own some stocks that would benefit if the dollar continued to decline).

If the dollar is to fall, one must ask what against currency will it fall?:

The Japanese yen? Japan has its own, more immediate crisis: its economy has been in recession since the late 1980s, it has one of the oldest populations in the developed world, and its savings rate has declined greatly and is still falling. Japan has been trapped in a zero-interest policy that it may not be able to sustain for much longer. Its debt-to-gross domestic product is second only to Zimbabwe’s, and even a small increase in interest rates will put a significant pressure on its budget. So the yen is not it.

As I have written previously, Japan was on the stimulus bandwagon for more than a decade; and with the exception of government debt-to-GDP tripling, Japan has nothing to show for it . Its economy is mired in the same rut it was in when the stimulus marathon started. It had a hard time giving up stimulus because the short-term consequences were too painful. Also, Japan is proof that a low (zero) interest-rate policy loses its stimulating ability over time and turns into a death trap for the economy as leverage ratios are geared to low interest rates. Now, even a small increase in interest rates (say, from 1% to 2%) would be devastating for Japan’s economy.”

The US is not Japan: our housing and stock market overvaluations were not as extreme; our corporations are in much better shape (though consumers are in worse shape); we are not xenophobic, thus our population is growing through immigration; we don’t have a significant cultural issue of “saving face” to overcome. Thus, although we sometimes don’t let bankrupt companies go bankrupt to the degree we should – at least not since Lehman – creative destruction is allowed to exist to a far greater degree here than it was in Japan.

The euro? The euro blankets a collection of 20+ countries with very different interests. As John Mauldin put it, and I agree, the euro was created for prosperity, not adversity. Europe has its own demographic issues, such as high unemployment. So I am not betting on the euro against the dollar, either.

The Chinese renminbi? The People’s Republic of China is neither the people’s nor is it a republic. Despite its economic progress, China is still a communist country with a totalitarian regime and limited human and property rights. The Chinese government made the choice of growth at any cost even if projects don’t (or barely) cover the return on capital. It has done so at the cost of undermining the purchasing power of its people by manipulating its currency, keeping it significantly undervalued. I’ve written a lot about significant Chinese economic problems will likely surface down the road.

Lately I’ve been hearing chatter of “nominating” the Chinese currency to reserve currency status. This is unlikely to happen for the reasons I’ve just mentioned, and also it goes against the Chinese business model. As long as the Chinese model is to be a low-cost producer and exporter to the world, reserve currency status is off the table. If the rest of the world decides to park their money in the Chinese currency, it will drive the renminbi up and decapitate China’s export industry.

Maybe the Russian ruble? Unfortunately, Russia is a a one-trick petrochemical pony. The natural resources of Russia are more a curse than a blessing, as they detract capital from and hinder development in non-commodity industries.

What’s happening in the US isn’t good for the dollar, but I’m not sure the rest of the world is in a much better position.


Vitaliy N. Katsenelson, CFA, is a portfolio manager/director of research at Investment Management Associates in Denver, Colo. He is the author of “Active Value Investing:
Making Money in Range-Bound Markets” (Wiley 2007).

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Canadian Market, China, Markets | 1 Comment »


Words from the (investment) wise for the week that was (Dec 29, 2008 – Jan 4, 2009)


Sunday, January 4th, 2009

Changing the digits on the calendar from ’08 to ’09 may not have transformed the dire outlook for the global economy, but during the holiday-shortened New Year week investors appeared adamant to put the rout of 2008 behind them.

Although mercifully the door has been closed on 2008, let’s recap some of the unprecedented movements experienced in financial markets during the year.

Equities:
– MSCI World Index: -42.1% (worst yearly performance since start of Index in 1970)

- S&P 500 Index: -38.5% (worst annual percentage decline since 1937 and 3rd worst on record; largest quarterly [4th quarter: -298] and daily [September 29: -107] points decline ever; 6th worst daily percentage decline [October 15: -9.0%])

- Dow Jones Industrial Index: -33.8% (worst annual percentage decline since 1931 and 3rd worst on record; largest quarterly [4th quarter: -2,330] and daily [September 29: -778] points decline ever; 6th worst daily percentage decline [October 15: -7.9%])

- S&P 500 and Dow Jones: There was no point in 2008 where the indices were up for the year at the close of a trading day. Since 1900, 2008 was only the 4th year (after 1910, 1962 and 1977) where the Dow never had a single day where it closed up for the year, according to Bespoke.

- FTSE Eurofirst 300 Index: -44.8% (worst yearly percentage fall since its creation in 1986)

- Nikkei 225 Average: -42.1% (biggest annual percentage decline on record)

- CBOE Volatility Index (VIX): Historical high in November based on new calculation, but remained below levels seen during the 1987 crash based on an previous calculation.

Treasuries:
– US Treasuries: Yields dropped to lowest levels since 1950.

- US 10-year Treasury Notes: Yields fell by 182 basis points – biggest yearly points decline since 1995 and the second biggest in the last 20 years.

Currencies:
– Japanese Trade-weighted Index: +25.0% (largest annual rise since currency was allowed to float freely in 1973)

- Pound against US dollar: -26.2% (worst annual decline since gold standard was abandoned in 1971)

- Pound against euro: -22.8% (worst yearly decline since launch of single currency in 1999)

Commodities:
– Reuters/Jeffries CRB Index: -36.0% (worst annual performance since inception of Index in 1956)

The table below highlights the performance of the principal asset classes for 2008. While West Texas Intermediate Crude (-53.5%), the S&P 500 Index (-38.5%) and the Reuters/Jeffries CRB Index (-36.0%) recorded large losses, US 30-year Treasury Bonds (+18.6%) fared very well, and the US Dollar Index (+6.0%) and gold bullion (+5.5%) also provided safe havens for risk-averse investors. (The returns for indices in individual countries are given in my December 31 “Stock market performance round-up”.)

sp500-30y-bond-price-1.jpg

But the few trading days since Christmas Eve witnessed a strong rebound in global stock markets as investors brushed aside bleak economic data. This resulted in market participants scooping up beaten-down stocks and commodities, mending some of the bruising sustained earlier in 2008. The better spirit of equities was reflected in losses for some government bonds.

Despite a grim ISM report (see section on Economy below), the S&P 500 Index jumped by 3.2% after the release of the data, propelling many stock market indices to almost two-month highs. The MSCI World Index (+5.9%), MSCI Emerging Markets Index (+5.3%), Dow Jones Industrial Index (+6.1%), S&P 500 Index (+6.8%), Nasdaq Composite Index (+6.7%) and the Russell 2000 Index (+6.1%) all gained handsomely (albeit on thin volume) during the week straddling New Year’s day.

prent-2.jpg

Source: Daryl Cagle

December also marked the first monthly gain since August for the major US indices, with the Dow Jones and S&P 500 now up by 19.6% and 23.9% respectively since the lows of November 20, 2008.

The “storm” of 2008 has undoubtedly grown quieter in December, with the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) having declined from 80.9 in November to 39.6 on Friday. Also, the average daily swing in the Dow Jones has fallen to ~300 points compared to ~430 points in November and ~590 points in October, according to Briefing.com.

Christmas Eve trading on Wednesday, December 24 marked the start of the Santa Claus Rally period, made up of the last five trading days of December and the first two of January. With one trading day to go on Monday, the combined gain for the S&P 500 Index for the first six days was 8.0%. The absence of a rally – and one now seems highly unlikely – has often been the harbinger of a sizeable correction or a bear market in the coming year. Hence the saying: “If Santa Claus should fail to call; bears may come to Broad & Wall.”

But risks remain plentiful and Bill King (The King Report) reminds us that “just as night follows day, international conflicts follow economic crises”. Escalating violence in the Middle East and tensions between Russia and the Ukraine served as a reminder and caused a 22.9% spike in the price of West Texas Intermediate Crude on the week.

Next, a quick textual analysis of my week’s reading material (done between New Year’s celebrations). No surprises here with keywords such as “economy”, “financial”, “market”, “prices” and “rates” featuring prominently.

prent-3.jpg

Readers often ask me about Richard Russell’s (Dow Theory Letters) viewpoint on the stock market. Here is his latest take on matters: “It occurs to me that this is a good time to remember my old friend Marty Zweig’s classic warnings: ‘Don’t fight the tape, don’t fight the Fed’. Well, if you are bearish on 2009, you are indeed fighting the Fed and probably the tape. Why do I say that? Because the Bernanke Fed is going all out in its effort to turn the US economy around. Bernanke says the Fed will do whatever it takes to halt the current trend to deflation and to bring back prosperity and mild inflation to the US.

“The stock market seems to have finally climbed aboard the Fed’s bullish bandwagon. All of which brings us to a very dramatic and critical juncture. If the market heads higher in early January, I believe that money on the sidelines [$8.85 trillion – 74% of US market cap] could begin to turn optimistic and even bullish,” said the R man.

From across the pond, David Fuller (Fullermoney) added: “The crucial missing ingredient for stock markets to date has been confidence. Nevertheless that could change in January, given the high levels of cash held by most institutional investors. … if stock market indices surprise the bearish consensus and start to break upwards rather than downwards from their trading ranges, institutional investors will be under increasing pressure to participate.”

What the market does over the next few days will give a clue as to the rest of the year, according to Jeffrey Hirsch (Stock Trader’s Almanac). “S&P gains during January’s first five trading days preceded full-year gains 86% of the time.” He also draws attention to the so-called “January Barometer” which states “as the S&P 500 Index goes in January, so goes the year”. “The January Barometer predicts the year’s course with a .741 batting average. 12 of the last 14 post-election years followed January’s direction,” said Hirsch. Also, the “ninth” year of decades is generally an up year for the stock market with the Dow Jones down only three times in the last twelve decades.

The table below shows the key resistance and support levels for the major US indices. With most global indices having breached the 50-day moving average (and after year-end also having taken out the December peaks), the next target is the November 4 highs, followed by the key 200-day average. On the downside, the December 1 (not shown on table) and the all-important November 20 lows must hold for the uptrend to remain intact.

tabel2.jpg

In my opinion, selective buying in global markets is in order, and ’09 may turn out to be a good year for a discerning stock picker. However, make sure to separate the wheat from the chaff because many companies will fall by the wayside during the new year. (Also see my posts “Stock market internals: further headway in 2009” and “Video-o-rama: Ring out the old, ring in the new” for more discussion of the outlook for stock markets in 2008.)

Economy
“Overall business confidence improved just a bit at the close of to 2008, but remains very dark with hiring intentions and expectations regarding the outlook in mid-2009 dropping to record lows,” said the latest Survey of Business Confidence of the World conducted by Moody’s Economy.com. The Survey results indicate that the entire global economy is solidly in recession.

moodys.jpg

Further evidence of the worldwide economic crisis came from the Semiconductor Industry Association, reporting that global sales of semiconductors declined by 9.8% in November compared with a year ago, and by 7.2% since the previous month.

Data reports released in the US during the New Year week mostly confirmed the dismal economic outlook.

- The Institute for Supply Management’s Manufacturing Index is still contracting and fell by a larger-than-anticipated 3.8 points to 32.4 in December. The index is at its lowest level since 1980, with the forward-looking details also downbeat as new orders plunged to their lowest level since January 1948.

- The S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices reported record annual declines, with the 10-City and 20-City Composite Indices falling by 19.1% and 18.0% respectively.

- The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index declined in December to a historic low of 38 – down by 6.6 points from November’s 44.7. With consumer confidence in a perilous state, the outlook for spending appears dismal.

- Initial jobless claims decreased by 94,000 to 492,000 for the week ended December 27. Fewer-than-expected claims were filed, but holidays have been known to be more volatile for this indicator. Overall, labor market trends suggest persistent weakening.

- The ECRI Weekly Leading Index increased from 106.8 to 108 during the week ended December 26, but does not alter the Index’s overall downward trend. The meaningful decline in the ECRI indicates a severe slowdown that could last deep into 2009.

Commenting on the implications of the worsening employment situation for the US consumer, Mark Vitner (Wachovia Economics Group) said credit availability and housing affordability were two important elements of consumer buying decisions, but that an even more important variable was consumers’ comfort about their own employment and income prospects.

“Consumers typically have to have a job if they are going to buy a home or automobile. And even if consumers have a job, they are less likely to borrow and spend if they feel their job is at risk or their income could take a hit,” said Vitner.

Elsewhere in the world, major economies remain mired in a severe slump. “Europe, Germany, France, and the UK all reported declines in indexes of purchasing managers in December,” said Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust). China’s factory sector has contracted for the fifth month running according to the CLSA China Purchasing Managers’ Index. … the Australian … Manufacturing Index has recorded readings below 50 for seven consecutive months … In sum, weak economic conditions across the world is a challenge for policy makers in the months ahead.”

clsa.jpg

Source: US Global Investors – Weekly Investor Alert, January 2, 2009.

Assessing the global economic outlook, Nouriel Roubini (RGE Monitor) posed the following questions on RealClearMarkets: “So what lies ahead in 2009? Is the worst behind us or ahead of us?

“The United States will certainly experience its worst recession in decades, a deep and protracted contraction lasting about 24 months through the end of 2009. Moreover, the entire global economy will contract. There will be recession in the Eurozone, the UK, Continental Europe, Canada, Japan, and the other advanced economies. There is also a risk of a hard landing for emerging-market economies, as trade, financial and currency links transmit real and financial shocks to them,” said Roubini.

Week’s economic reports
Click here for the week’s economy in pictures, courtesy of Jake of EconomPic Data.

economatric 01 04 09

Source: Yahoo Finance, January 2, 2009.

In addition to the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) releasing the minutes of its December 16 meeting (Tuesday, January 6) and the Bank of England’s interest rate announcement (Thursday, January 8), the US economic highlights for the next week, courtesy of Northern Trust, include the following:

1. Employment Situation (January 9): Payroll employment is predicted to have dropped by 450,000 in December after a loss of 533,000 jobs in the prior month. The unemployment rate is expected to have risen to 7.0% during December from 6.7% in November. Consensus: Payrolls – -478,000 versus -533,000 in November, unemployment rate – 7.0% versus 6.7% in November.

2. Other reports: Consumer Confidence (December 30), Construction Spending, Auto Sales (January 5), Factory Orders, ISM Non-manufacturing, Pending Home Sales Index (January 6).

Markets
The performance chart obtained from the Wall Street Journal Online shows how different global markets performed during the past week.

whats-hot-and-not.jpg

Source: Wall Street Journal Online, January 2, 2009.

Good riddance to 2008! Let’s hope that after one of the most tumultuous years in history, conditions will calm down – as always happens after a storm. And may this compilation of news items and words from the investment wise assist in keeping our portfolios on a profitable course.

To all the Investment Postcards readers, thank you for your loyalty and support. And remember, the biggest compliment you could give us is to broadcast word about the site and encourage your family, friends and colleagues to subscribe to the e-mail updates or RSS feeds.

Here’s wishing you a blessed and calm 2009!

pessimism.jpg

Source: Daryl Cagle

 

YouTube: Uncle Jay’s review of 2008
“It’s been a whole year since Uncle Jay has SUNG an entire episode, and here’s the reminder why! It’s the year-end review of the news, and maybe it’ll seem a little better with music.“

ungle-jay.jpg

Source: YouTube, December 21, 2008.

The New York Times: The year in the markets
Click the image for an interactive graph.

dec-31.jpg

Source: The New York Times, December 31, 2008 (hat tip: Barry Ritholtz).

Bloomberg: A recap of 2008
“A two-minute look into the year that changed the economic landscape.”

video1.jpg

Source: Bloomberg (via YouTube), December 31, 2008.

Win Rosenfeld (The Big Money): The five worst days of 2008
“You know it’s been a bad year when you’re arguing about what the five worst days were. Between the massive market fluctuations and the biggest banks going belly up, it’s hard to know where to start. From a crowded field of contenders, here are The Big Money’s five biggest buzz-killers.”

video2.jpg

Source: Win Rosenfeld, The Big Money, December 30, 2008.

Bloomberg: Marc Faber’s 2009 outlook
Marc Faber says the global economy is going into severe recession and emerging markets will be hit the hardest.

video3.jpg

Source: Bloomberg (via YouTube), December 31, 2008.

Bloomberg: Jim Rogers – “I’m prepared for the worst”

video4.jpg

Source: Bloomberg (via YouTube), December 29, 2008.

CNBC: Map of the markets
“Where to put your money in 2009, with Michael Pento, Delta Global Advisors; David Kotok, Cumberland Advisors; Diane Brady, BusinessWeek; Dave Maney, Headwaters MB; and CNBC’s Rebecca Jarvis.”

video5.jpg

Source: CNBC, December 31, 2008.

Bill King (The King Report): Unlikely that ’09 will be as ugly as ’08
“2008 will be a year of historic imfamy. The S&P 500 declined 38.5%, the biggest drop since 1937. The Dow Jones Industrial Average declined 33.8%, the largest drop since 1931.

“It is highly unlikely that 2009 will be as ugly. But this does not suggest that it will be a ‘good’ year.

“Back in October we commented that the stock market is following a clear historic pattern. A summer folly rally amid a receding economy and percolating financial duress produced an autumn collapse.

“And an October panic did not generate a low for stocks because during recessions, like in 1907 and 1929, October panic lows yield to new lows in November.

“But then a yearned rally appears. This usually extends into the first day or two of the New Year. But then January turns ugly on anticipated horrid earnings reports that will appear during the second and third weeks of the month. Finally there is a performance gaming rally over the last few days of January.

“When bonds rally sharply in Q4, they tend to make a significant peak early in January. Bonds by then are extended, even ‘over-invested’, and corporations and governments tend to burst the dyke by issuing beaucoup bonds for financing needs in the coming year.

“However, this year will be tricky because Weimar Ben is monetizing everything in sight. Weimar Ben can continue to monetize everything and anything – until the market revolts. And the revolt will likely come from the dollar.

“Though Ben and US solons desire a lower dollar in the hope of papering over the US’s intractable structural problems, there is a line of demarcation for the dollar. If the dollar descents below that incalculable threshold, it’s checkmate, Ben.”

Source: Bill King, The King Report, January 2, 2009.

Financial Times: 2009 – predictions of some known unknowns
“The Financial Times team of pundits is back, once again, to risk its professional reputation on bold predictions of some known unknowns.

“Will the recession end in 2009?

“No, as far as the US, the UK, Spain and Ireland are concerned; possibly Yes for other European economies and Japan. Whatever happens, 2009 will not be pleasant. For all the cuts in interest rates and taxes, higher unemployment will be the dominant issue of the first half of the year, outweighing gains to real incomes from these policies and lower commodity prices. Uncertainty will be the watchword for the year, making any prediction precarious, but there is still a good chance that rising incomes will become powerful forces in the continental European and Japanese economies later in the year. For those economies that need much bigger rises in household savings rates to adjust for the recession, recoveries will be delayed. There is also a good chance the world will enter a debt-deflation trap, although I hope the authorities will do everything to avoid this. But even if we experience genuine green shoots of recovery, as I expect, 2009 will be a year to forget.”

Click here for the full article.

Source: Financial Times, December 30, 2008.

Financial Times: Survey of economists – outlook for 2009
The Financial Times polled 67 leading economists for their views on the outlook for 2009. The full breakdown of their answers is given below.

1) Recession: How will this recession develop over the next twelve months? Will we see the green shoots of recovery by this time next year?

recession.jpg

2) Risks: What are the three main risks that could profoundly exacerbate the recession? How concerned should people be?

risks.jpg

3) Global outlook: Which part of the world will recover first and why?

global-outlook.jpg

Click here for the full article.

Source: Financial Times, January 1, 2009.

Edmund Conway (The Telegraph): Global economy to shrink for first time since the Second World War
“HSBC has warned that global gross domestic product will contract in 2009, describing this as ‘an extraordinary development in the modern era’. In a comprehensive examination of the economic crisis, it predicts that next year will be the worst in peacetime both for rich countries and the wider global economy since the Great Depression.

“And in a further blow to the Chancellor Alistair Darling, the bank warned that the UK will endure its worst year of growth since the bleak winter recession of 1947, forcing the Bank of England to slash interest rates to only a quarter percentage point above zero. The gloomy forecasts are far more pessimistic than those from the Treasury or the International Monetary Fund.

“Stephen King, HSBC’s chief economist, said: ‘For a while, it was possible to pretend that the financial and economic crisis was merely a problem for the major industrialised countries.

“‘Over the last three months, however, that theory has been blown out of the water. We have made savage downgrades to our forecasts with some of the emerging markets bearing the brunt of the bad news. On the basis of nominal GDP weights, we expect global GDP to shrink in 2009, an extraordinary development in the modern era.’

“He added that the serious risk now is that families and businesses will begin to hoard cash rather than spending it, as deflation rears its head across the rich world.

“‘Stuffing cash under the mattress, however, will only end in cumulative tears,’ he said. ‘This, after all, was part of the dynamic associated with the Depression in the 1930s.’”

Source: Edmund Conway, The Telegraph, December 27, 2008.

Wolfgang Münchau (Financial Times): World economy in 2009 ” three priorities for recovery
“It is easy and difficult at the same time to predict the economy in 2009. It is easy to predict it will be an awful year for the US, Europe and large parts of Asia. The industrialised world will be in a deep synchronised recession. Global gross domestic product will probably contract also for the first time since the 1930s. There is not a great deal we can do to prevent this.

“The difficult part of the forecast is to predict whether policymakers will succeed in preventing the recession turning into a depression and lay the foundations for a sustainable recovery in 2010. What I can predict with near certainty is that policy will matter a great deal next year.

“We know that the current driving force behind this downturn is ‘deleveraging’. Overindebted households and undercapitalised banks are adjusting their balance sheets, building up savings in the first case and restricting lending in the latter. There is no chance of a sustained economic recovery until that process is almost complete.”

Click here for full article.

Source: Wolfgang Münchau, Financial Times, December 28, 2008.

Times Online: Car production faces global fall until 2010“Car production in North America will sink to its lowest level for more than 20 years next year and output in Europe will fall to a 12-year low, with Britain hit the hardest, according to PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC).

“The accountancy firm is forecasting a 17% drop in the United States to 10.8 million cars and a 12% fall in the European Union to 15.5 million vehicles. Asia Pacific will experience the smallest fall, with a 5% decline to 26 million cars.

“PwC expects world production to fall by 10% to levels of output last seen in 2003.

“Calum McRae, automotive analyst at PwC, said: ‘These figures demonstrate that there is further gloom to come before we can possibly see the effect of any bailouts or incentives.’”

Source: Christine Buckley, Times Online, December 30, 2008.

Financial Times: IMF argues for large stimulus packages
“Across-the-board tax cuts or bail-outs of troubled industries such as the automotive sector are likely to waste government money while doing little to stimulate the global economy, the International Monetary Fund warned on Monday.

“As governments around the world bring in tax cuts and boost spending to combat the global recession, a study by the IMF said such programs must be large but carefully designed.

“‘There is a strong case for doing too much rather than too little,’ said Olivier Blanchard, the fund’s chief economist. But, he added, tax cuts should be aimed at people likely to spend money rather than save it.

“Although the IMF said it would resist giving a running commentary on policies, Mr Blanchard said signs of the stimulus plan emerging from the camp of US president-elect Barack Obama appeared to be hopeful. ‘The size corresponds roughly to what we think is needed,’ he said.

“Mr Obama’s team is reportedly considering a fiscal stimulus worth $675 billion to $775 billion, or 5% to 6% of US gross domestic product, likely to include substantial long-term investment spending.”

Source: Alan Beattie, Financial Times, December 29, 2008.

CNBC: Martin Feldstein on the stimulus package
“Discussing the kind of stimulus that should come out of Washington, with Martin Feldstein, Harvard University professor, President Emeritus of the National Bureau of Economic Research, & Council of Economic Advisors former chairman under President Reagan, with CNBC’s Steve Liesman.”

video6-martin-feldsman.jpg

Source: CNBC, January 2, 2009.

Financial Times: GMAC gets $6 billion injection from US Treasury
“The US Treasury department late on Monday unveiled up to $6 billion in aid for GMAC, the financial services group which is critical to part-owner General Motors‘ turnaround.

“The Treasury said in a statement it would buy $5 billion in senior preferred equity with an 8% dividend from GMAC, characterizing the investment as part of ‘a broader program to assist the domestic automotive industry in becoming financially viable’.

“It will also lend GM up to $1 billion to participate in a rights offering at GMAC in support of GMAC’s reorganization as a bank holding company.

“Diminished access to capital had forced GMAC to cut back on vehicle financing, which in turn jeopardized GM itself.

“‘With the Treasury investment, we intend to resume our automotive lending quickly,’ GMAC spokeswoman Gina Proia said.

“The aid, which is being made under the Troubled Assets Relief Program (Tarp), comes after the Treasury earlier this month said it would extend a $17.4 billion emergency loan package to GM and Chrysler.”

Source: Nicole Bullock, Henny Sender and Bernard Simon, Financial Times, December 29, 2008.

Karl Denninger (Market-Ticker): GMAC’s “money-losing strategy” makes no sense
“The government ‘buys’ preferred equity that pays an 8% coupon. GMAC must pay that 8% coupon (9% if the government exercises the warrants).

“GMAC turns around and loans out money at 0% which it has to pay 8% to acquire, and at the same time decides that it will make loans to people with credit scores significantly worse than average, when before they would make loans only to people with scores that were slightly better than average. And we wonder how we got into this mess?

“The Federal Reserve and Treasury approved an application that contained as it’s essence an intentional money-losing business strategy, enabling the literal looting of the public treasury under the false pretense of an ‘investment’.”

Source: Karl Denninger, Market-Ticker, December 31, 2008.

Financial Times: Fed pushes on with mortgage bond plan
“The Federal Reserve pushed ahead with its plan to buy mortgage bonds issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on Tuesday, saying it would start buying early next month and purchase up to $500 billion by the end of June.

“The aggressive tactics – the Fed had previously said it would buy this amount over ‘several quarters’ – highlights the central bank’s determination to hammer down the risk spreads on the mortgage bonds and thereby reduce mortgage rates.

“The Fed also announced that it had selected four asset managers – BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, Pimco and Wellington Management – to manage the process. It had agreed a ‘competitive fee structure’ but did not disclose this.

“The Fed said ‘the program is being established to support the mortgage and housing markets and to foster improved conditions in financial markets more generally’.

“The move comes as policymakers at the central bank and in both the outgoing Bush and incoming Obama administrations look to target mortgage rates in the hope that lowering them would arrest the decline in house prices and thereby support financial asset prices.”

Source: Krishna Guha, Financial Times, December 30, 2008.

Bloomberg: Barclays’s head says “worst is ahead” for US economy
“Ethan Harris, co-head of US economic research at Barclays Capital, and Richard DeKaser, chief economist at National City Corp., talk with Bloomberg’s Peter Cook about the outlook for the US economy.”

video7-barclays.jpg

Source: Bloomberg (via Blinx), December 31, 2008.

Paul Krugman (The New York Times): The yield curve is wonkish
“I’m a little late getting to this, but … I see that economists at the Cleveland Fed are taking some comfort from the positive slope of the yield curve. Long-term interest rates are higher than short-term rates, which is usually a sign that the economy will expand.

“Not this time, I’m afraid. It’s all about the zero lower bound.

“The reason for the historical relationship between the slope of the yield curve and the economy’s performance is that the long-term rate is, in effect, a prediction of future short-term rates. If investors expect the economy to contract, they also expect the Fed to cut rates, which tends to make the yield curve negatively sloped. If they expect the economy to expand, they expect the Fed to raise rates, making the yield curve positively sloped.

“But here’s the thing: the Fed can’t cut rates from here, because they’re already zero. It can, however, raise rates. So the long-term rate has to be above the short-term rate, because under current conditions it’s like an option price: short rates might move up, but they can’t go down.

“Indeed, if we look at Japan we find that the yield curve was positively sloped all the way through the lost decade. In 1999-2000, with the zero interest rate policy in effect, long rates averaged about 1.75%, not too far below current rates in the United States.

“So sad to say, the yield curve doesn’t offer any comfort. It’s only telling us what we already know: that conventional monetary policy has literally hit bottom.”

Source: Paul Krugman, The New York Times, December 27, 2008.

Karl Denninger (Market-Ticker): Uh oh … monetary multiplier below zero

m1-money-multiplier.jpg

“What is this?

“I could go through the derivation of how money supply works in a fractional reserve monetary system, but won’t, because most readers would have their eyes glaze over.

“The important part of this graph is what it denotes. Bernanke has lost control of ‘N’ (or velocity), which is the actual knob that he is trying to diddle when borrowing rates are changed (and in fact its the market that sets that, despite his protests).

“In fact the most useful tool in The Fed’s box in terms of influencing monetary policy is the soapbox, that is, jawboning (whether it be by cajoling or threatening.)

“The problem with an M1 multiplier below one is that the effect of printing money is of course multiplied by the velocity. That is, if you print up $10 into the economy the impact it has on economic activity depends on how many times that $10 circulates in a given amount of time. The more it circulates the higher the impact and the more your efforts do for the economy.

“The bad news is that when the multiplier is less than one the more money you spew into the economy the worse the impact, as you get less for each additional dollar.”

Source: Karl Denniger, Market-Ticker, December 30, 2008.

John Silvia (Wachovia Economics Group): ISM Manufacturing – economy remains in teeth of the recession
“December’s ISM manufacturing index came in at 32.4, well within recession territory and consistent with levels of the 1980-82 recession period. Weakness remains in new orders, production and employment. The inventory correction is ongoing. Prices paid fell sharply to 1949 lows and suggests lower inflation ahead.”

ism-composite-index.jpg

Source: John Silvia, Wachovia Economics Group, December 30, 2008.

Standard & Poor’s: Case-Shiller – home price declines worsen
“Data through October 2008, released today [Tuesday] by Standard & Poor’s for its S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices, shows continued broad based declines in the prices of existing single family homes across the United States, with 14 of the 20 metro areas showing record rates of annual decline and 14 now reporting declines in excess of 10% versus October 2007.

sp-case-shiller.jpg

“The chart above depicts the annual returns of the 10-City Composite and the 20-City Composite Home Price Indices. Following the lead of the 14 metro areas described above, the 10-City and 20-City Composites set new records, with annual declines of 19.1% and 18.0%, respectively.

“‘The bear market continues; home prices are back to their March, 2004 levels.’ says David Blitzer, Chairman of the Index Committee at Standard & Poor’s. ‘Both composite indices and 14 of the 20 metro areas are reporting new record rates of decline.’”

Source: Standard & Poor’s, December 30, 2008.

Mark Vitner (Wachovia Economics Group): Consumer confidence falls to a new low“Worries about employment and income prospects were likely weighing on consumers’ minds this holiday season, contributing to a larger than expected drop in consumer confidence. The Consumer Confidence Index fell 6.7 points to an all-time low of 38.0 in December, with most of the drop in the present situation series.

“While the present situation index is responsible for most of December’s drop, the record low in the overall index is due mostly to consumers’ extremely pessimistic view of future economic conditions. The present situation index plunged 12.9 points in December to 29.4, which is the lowest reading since the aftermath of the 1990/91 recession. The future expectations component, however, remains near all-time lows, even though it declined just 2.4 points to 43.8 December and remains above its October low.

“The Consumer Confidence Index is one of the longest running measures of consumer behavior, dating all the way back to 1947. The index has a very good record of tracking the performance of overall economic activity but has a very mixed record as a leading indicator.”

consumer-confidence-index.jpg

Source: Mark Vitner, Wachovia Economics Group, December 30, 2008.

The Wall Street Journal: Retail sales plummet
“Price-slashing failed to rescue a bleak holiday season for beleaguered retailers, as sales plunged across most categories on shrinking consumer spending, according to new data released Thursday.

“Despite a flurry of last-minute shoppers lured by the deep discounts, total retail sales, excluding automobiles, fell over the year-earlier period by 5.5% in November and 8% in December through Christmas Eve, according to MasterCard Inc.’s SpendingPulse unit.

“When gasoline sales are excluded, the fall in overall retail sales is more modest: a 2.5% drop in November and a 4% decline in December. A 40% drop in gasoline prices over the year-earlier period contributed to the sharp decline in total sales.

“But considering individual sectors, ‘This will go down as the one of the worst holiday sales seasons on record,’ said Mary Delk, a director in the retail practice at consulting firm Deloitte LLP. ‘Retailers went from ‘Ho-ho’ to ‘Uh-oh’ to ‘Oh-no’.’

“Luxury goods, once considered immune from economic turmoil, were hardest hit, with sales falling 21.2%, compared with a jump of 7.5% a year ago, when the economy had just begun to sputter. Including jewelry sales, the luxury sector plunged by a whopping 34.5%.

“During the same period last year, overall retail sales rose a modest 2.4%, helped by late-season discounting that enticed procrastinating shoppers. But this year, after a moderate uptick in shopping activity boosted by steep promotions the Friday after Thanksgiving, shoppers closed their wallets and reopened them only cautiously, worried by job losses, a sinking stock market and a recession climbing into its second year.”

Source: Ann Zimmerman, Jennifer Saranow and Miguel Bustillo, The Wall Street Journal, December 26, 2008.

Reuters: Bush signs pension relief bill into law
“President George W. Bush on Tuesday signed into law a measure intended to help company pension plans and retirees that have been hard hit by the financial crisis.

“Despite some concerns about the legislation, Bush decided that in the current financial environment the benefits outweighed the problems, the White House said.

“Generally healthy multi-employer pension plans hurt by the stock market decline would not have to make drastic pension plan contribution increases and worker benefit cutbacks that many companies had feared.

“A multi-employer pension plan, unlike a traditional single-employer plan, covers workers from more than one company and allows workers to move from job to job and still contribute to the plan.

“People 70-1/2 years old or older would not have to take distributions from their retirement plans as required under current law, allowing them to keep savings intact and avoid a bear-market tax hit.

“White House spokesman Tony Fratto said the administration had concerns that the legislation would increase the costs of near-term claims on the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation and could result in some benefits lost to workers over the long term. ‘Our concerns with the legislation remain, but we do believe that, in this current economic environment and current economic circumstances, that the benefits of the legislation outweighed our objections,’ he said.”

Source: Tabassum Zakaria, Reuters, December 23, 2008.

Financial Times: Auditors urge rethink on pension
“Auditors are pressing companies to reconsider how they calculate their pension liabilities and urging them to use formulas that could give rise to much larger reported deficits than would be the case if they stayed with the current approach.
Market volatility has raised questions over the so-called ‘discount rate’ used to calculate the present-day value of a fund’s future liabilities.

“The lower the rate used, the higher the present liabilities will be. The rates currently used by companies to calculate those liabilities are roughly equivalent to those on less risky high-grade corporate bonds. However, these have soared amid the market turmoil, sharply shrinking reported fund deficits.

“Some schemes have actually reported a surplus even as the values of the stocks they hold have plunged.”

Source: Norma Cohen and Jennifer Hughes, Financial Times, December 30, 2008.

Financial Times: Money flows out of hedge funds at record rate
“Investors pulled a net $32 billion from hedge funds last month, making 2008 the first year in their recorded history that the funds have had significant outflows and ending the industry’s 18 years of asset growth.

“Money has been taken out of funds following every strategy, even those – such as macro funds – which were showing returns, according to data from fund trackers Hedge Fund Research.

“The funds enjoyed net inflows for the first part of the year, even as the financial crisis hit and traditional mutual funds began to show outflows.

“However, in September a tide of redemptions began, according to TrimTabs, another fund tracker.

“Conrad Gann, chief operating officer of TrimTabs, said: ‘We estimate outflows in November were $32 billion, and there is an additional pipeline of redemptions that have not been filled, there could be $80 billion [of redemptions] in December.

“‘There are $57 billion of redemptions that we know are in, that are not reflected yet,’ he said.

“Mr Gann said it was difficult to estimate outflows for coming months because hedge funds had different redemption cycles.

“In recent months funds have also tried to halt outflows by limiting or suspending investor withdrawals. This means that data on outflows, which reflect actual repayments to investors, understates the true picture.

“This is the first year since at least 1990 that hedge funds have seen a drop in assets.”

Source: Deborah Brewster, Financial Times, December 30, 2008.

MarketWatch: Sam Stovall bullish on 2009, his father less so
“It’s been a horrible year for stocks overall – the worst, in fact, since 1931. Oft-cited market pundit Sam Stovall of Standard & Poor’s and his father, Robert Stovall, a veteran money manager at Wood Asset Management, review the past year with MarketWatch’s Steve Gelsi.”

video8-marketwatch.jpg

Source: MarketWatch, December 31, 2008.

Richard Russell: Stock crashes have look of completed declines
“Over the weekend, I reviewed the charts of hundreds of leading NYSE stocks. Many of these stocks have crashed. In almost all cases, RSI has plunged to severely oversold levels. I note that at the end of each crash, the price action has been forming a sideways pattern. These numerous crashes have the look of completed declines – declines from which bases are forming. Following a true crash, stocks and stock averages have a habit of recovering roughly 50% of the action lost in the crash.

“And I’m wondering whether these patterns are now indicating that a tradeable low has been reached by this bear market. The news continues awful, and yet these various stock bottoms, following crashes, appear to be holding.”

Source: Richard Russell, Dow Theory Letters, December 29, 2008.

Bloomberg: Leuthold – cash at 18-year high makes stocks a buy
“There’s more cash available to buy shares than at any time in almost two decades, a sign to some of the most successful investors that equities will rebound after the worst year for US stocks since the Great Depression.

“The $8.85 trillion held in cash, bank deposits and money-market funds is equal to 74% of the market value of US companies, the highest ratio since 1990, according to Federal Reserve data compiled by Leuthold Group and Bloomberg.

Leuthold, Invesco Aim Advisors, Hennessy Advisors and BlackRock, which together oversee almost $1.7 trillion, say that’s a sign the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index will rise after $1 trillion in credit losses sent the benchmark index for American equities to the biggest annual drop since 1931. The eight previous times that cash peaked compared with the market’s capitalization the S&P 500 rose an average 24% in six months, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

“‘There is a store of cash out there that is able to take the market higher,’ said Eric Bjorgen, who helps oversee $3.4 billion at Leuthold in Minneapolis. ‘The same dollar you had last year buys you twice as much S&P 500 as it did a year ago.’

“Leuthold Group, whose Grizzly Short Fund returned 83% in 2008 thanks to bets against equities, said in its December bulletin to investors that stocks offer ‘one of the great buying opportunities of your lifetime’.”

Source: Eric Martin and Michael Tsang, Bloomberg, December 29, 2008.

David Fuller: 10 tangible reasons for a rally
“I have listed and illustrated 10 tangible reasons for a rally (no cheerleading here), and also discussed a crucial missing ingredient.

1. Governments have flooded the system with liquidity. It takes time for this to filter through to the economy but it will reach the stock market more quickly.

2. Interest rates are at record lows for the US and UK, both short-term and long-term, and heading lower elsewhere. This is an ideal background for stock market recoveries.

3. Valuations are much improved, despite legitimate concerns over the earnings outlook for at least the first half of 2009. Equity yields are competitive with government bond yields, despite the near certainty of more dividend cuts than increases over the next six months.

4. Corporate bond yields peaked in October and November and have fallen significantly. They have also begun to improve their performance relative to government bonds.

5. Various measures of investor/advisor sentiment reached extreme lows in October.

6. The VIX Index peaked in October and is trending lower.

7. Commodity indices have fallen significantly, lowering inflationary pressures. Historically, equities have done best in disinflationary environments.

8. In many countries, the financial sector is showing strength relative to the broader indices. This is a key lead indicator.

9. Levels of cash are at record highs.

10. Most broad stock market indices show some evidence of base formation development. This is less clear for the DOW, but can be seen for the FTSE 100, DAX, SX5E, FSSTI and NKY, to mention a few of many.

“In conclusion, technical evidence remains more conducive to a stock market rally rather than another slump. Over the last three weeks we have repeatedly mentioned the December reaction lows. They need to hold to remain consistent with our expectations for a ranging stock market recovery extending well into Q1 2009.

“The crucial missing ingredient for stock markets to date has been confidence. Nevertheless that could change in January, given the high levels of cash held by most institutional investors. If stock markets languish in the New Year, as many expect, there will be little reason for investors to reinvest in the stock market. However, if stock market indices surprise the bearish consensus and start to break upwards rather than downwards from their trading ranges, institutional investors will be under increasing pressure to participate. Failure to do so would put them at a competitive disadvantage in terms of 2009’s performance.

“Lastly, if the global economy does not show evidence that the recession is ending by Q3 2009, in response to the stimulus programmes, stock markets will be susceptible to a significant retracement of gains achieved during the first half of the year.”

Source: David Fuller, Fullermoney, December 30, 2008.

Barron’s: Seasonal patterns for the market
“Barron’s Michael Santoli discusses what market patterns to expect in the closing days of 2008 and the beginning of 2009.”

video9-barrons.jpg

Source: Barron’s, December 29, 2008.

Bespoke: Estimated earnings growth for the S&P 500
“Below we highlight historical earnings growth estimates for the S&P 500 for Q4 2008 and full-year 2009. As shown, EPS estimates have dropped sharply over the last few months, and analysts are currently expecting the S&P 500 to see year-over-year earnings fall by 12% in the fourth quarter.

“At the start of September, analysts were actually expecting growth of 40%, which was largely because financial companies were expected to bounce back from a very poor Q4 in 2007. Instead, these companies are struggling much more than they were at this time last year.

“Estimates for 2009 have been dropping significantly as well. Back in September, analysts were expecting 2009 earnings growth of 24.7% versus 2008. But estimates are now at just 4.5%, and judging by the current trend, analysts will be looking for negative 2009 growth in no time.

q4-2008-sp500.jpg

“Earnings for Materials are expected to fall the most at –63%, while Consumer Staples and Health Care are the only two sectors expected to see year over year growth.”

q4-yoy-eps-growth-estimates.jpg

Source: Bespoke, December 29, 2008.

John Hussman (Hussman Funds): Prices of Treasury bonds at dangerous levels
“… bond yields at this point are vulnerable to very sharp reversals. Given the level of extension in yields, it would not be difficult for the bond market to generate losses of say 10% in the 10-year Treasury bond, and as much as 20% to 25% in the 30-year Treasury bond over a very short period of time. Straight Treasuries may have safety from default risk, but the price risk is becoming downright dangerous.

“Corporate yields are much more reasonable, but there will be more fallout in this sector, and as I’ve noted before, taking a significant position in corporate would be essentially like a ‘bottom call’ in stocks, since corporate bonds tend to trade much like stocks during periods of elevated default risk.

“For our part, we strongly prefer Treasury inflation protected securities here. Despite near term deflationary prospects, the enormous expansion in government liabilities is unlikely to be accompanied by long-term inflation rates near zero, which is essentially the level that is priced into TIPS at present.”

Source: John Hussman, Hussman Funds, December 29, 2008.

Bespoke: Economists’ interest rate projections
“Below we highlight average estimates for the 10-Year Treasury Yield and the Fed Funds Rate going out to Q1 ‘10 based on Bloomberg’s survey of more than 50 economists. As shown, economists are expecting the 10-Year Yield to increase steadily in 2009, while they don’t expect the Fed Funds Rate to move back up to 50 bps until the third quarter. By the first quarter of 2010, economists expect the Fed Funds Rate to be back up to 1.00%. It’s hard to find an economist or analyst on the street that doesn’t think Treasuries will fall after the gains they’ve had in recent months. However, just like oil’s rally from $110 to $120 to $140, asset classes can move in one direction a lot more than most people expect.”

consensus-interest-rate-projections.jpg

Source: Bespoke, December 31, 2008.

Forbes: Big Brother investing
“William Gross has buying power few can match. The founder of money manager Pimco in Newport Beach, Calif. oversees $790 billion, most of it invested in fixed income. But now there’s a new bully on the block: Uncle Sam. The government is on a buying spree the likes of which has never been seen, its purchases of corporate debt held back only by the speed of the dollar printing presses.

“Many of the targets of Washington’s largesse are shaky financial outfits that Gross normally wouldn’t touch, like AIG. Its bonds trade now at 12% yield to maturity – junk level last summer. Investors may be fleeing, but Gross knows when he’s been outmuscled. In the past year the 64-year-old King of Bonds has bought $100 billion of preferred shares and senior debt of financial companies receiving taxpayer loans. His bet is that the government will throw good money after bad rather than let them fail.

“Gross may be buying what others are anxious to sell, but don’t interpret this as meaning he thinks the economy is soon recovering. In fact, he’s quite bearish. With stocks down 40% this year, he predicts Americans will shift from risk to thrift for at least a generation. He says higher savings, plus a move away from leverage by businesses and money managers, means the US economy will grow no more than 2% annually for years, a third slower than its 20-year average. Profit margins will narrow, stock gains will slow to a crawl and the government will find itself lending to the private sector for a long time.

“Gross’ theory is that the government will arrange to get itself paid back and that his investors can safely travel on the government’s coattails. Gross figures Washington is getting a return on its preferred securities, including the value of its equity warrants, of 6% annually. With investors fleeing banks, though, his yield is much higher for essentially the same securities: 10% to 13%. He says these issues are like $20 bills on the street that no one picks up because they can’t believe it’s true. ‘It’s the most incredible value I’ve ever seen,’ he says.”

Click here for the full article.

Source: Bernard Condon, Forbes, January 12, 2009.

Bespoke: High yield spreads contract 10% from December highs
“While it may be cold outside, the thaw we have been seeing in the credit markets reached a notable milestone on Friday. Based on data from Merrill Lynch indices, high yield spreads tightened from 1,979 to 1,955 basis points. From their peak reading of 2,182 basis points on December 15, high yield spreads have now contracted by 10.4%.

“While these levels are still extremely high, they are moving in the right direction. The hope now for the bulls is that this move is sustainable in the new year, when trading desks are back at fully staffed levels.”

high-yield-credit-spreads.jpg

Source: Bespoke, December 29, 2008.

BBC News: China to allow freer yuan trades
“China has said it is to allow some trade with its neighbours to be settled with its currency, the yuan. The pilot scheme was announced in a package of measures designed to help exporters hit by the global downturn.

“It means if the two parties to a trade have yuan available, they need not enter world exchange markets to pay. Most of China’s foreign trade is settled in US dollars or the euro, leaving exporters vulnerable to exchange rate fluctuations.

“The yuan is not yet a freely convertible currency.

“Officials did not say when the trial scheme would start. When it does, the yuan could be used to settle trade between parts of eastern China (Guangdong and the Yangtze River delta) and the territories of Hong Kong and Macau, and between south-west China (Guangxi and Yunnan) and the Asean group of countries (Brunei, Burma, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam).”

Source: BBC News, December 25, 2008.

Gulfnews: Single currency to increase clout
“A single currency backed by a common economic agenda and a unified monetary policy could make the Gulf a strong regional economic bloc, say economists and financial experts.

“‘The single currency is a huge opportunity for the Gulf region to make its economic clout felt in the international arena. Creation of a strong currency supported by nearly 50% of world’s oil wealth will prove to be a major stabilising factor for the regional economies,’ said Dr Nasser Saidi, Chief Economist of Dubai International Financial Centre.

“Besides attracting foreign investments, analysts say, a strong currency could become a key factor in preserving the region’s financial wealth and help recycle oil wealth within the region.

“Analysts believe the current global economic environment presents an ideal opportunity for the creation of a strong common currency that could emerge stronger than many international currencies such as the dollar, euro, yen and sterling.

“‘The Gulf common currency supported by the region’s resource wealth could become a major reserve currency attracting global reserves into the region. It could also help regional financial centres emerge as global financial centres competing with others such as New York and London,’ said Dr Saidi.

“Economists and currency experts believe the pegged currency regimes in the region and the direct link to the US monetary policy was one of the main reasons for the recent economic volatility in the region. Once the currency union is launched, the immediate priority of the Gulf Central Bank will be to launch a flexible monetary policy that ensures exchange rate stability.”

Source: Babu Das Augustine, Gulfnews, December 29, 2008.

Financial Times: Steel output set for historic drop
“The steel business faces a fall in production in 2009 of at least 10%, analysts say. This would be the biggest year-on-year fall for more than 60 years.

“According to the gloomiest projections, it could be at least four years before output returns to the levels of 2007.

“This would make the period of the expected downturn only the fifth occasion in the past century, leaving aside times of world war, when a slump in the steel industry has lasted four years or longer.

“The sector has been among those worst hit by this year’s financial storms, with share prices in many steel groups having fallen by more than two-thirds since the middle of 2008.

“Hit by a sudden reduction in orders in September and October from businesses such as construction, cars and white goods, many producers including Lakshmi Mittal’s ArcelorMittal, Severstal of Russia and Corus, owned by India’s Tata Steel, have sharply cut production.”

Source: Peter Marsh, Financial Times, December 28, 2008.

Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust): Global factory activity mired in a slump
“In Europe, Germany, France, and the UK all reported declines in indexes of purchasing managers in December.

“The overall Markit Eurozone Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) for the manufacturing sector declined to 33.9 in December, a record low in the 11-year history of the survey.

“The German Markit Purchasing Managers’ Index fell to 32.7, the lowest since the survey began in 1996, and the December decline marks the fifth monthly contraction in factory activity.

“The French Markit/CDAF purchasing managers’ index for manufacturing dropped to 34.9 in December versus 37.3 in November. This reading is the lowest since record keeping for this series began in April 1998.

“Britain’s manufacturing sector contracted for an eighth straight month running in December.

“China’s, factory sector has contracted for the fifth month running according to the CLSA China Purchasing Managers’ Index.

“Although the Australian Industry Group-PricewaterhouseCoopers Australian Performance of Manufacturing Index rose one point in December from November to 33.7 index points, this index has recorded readings below 50.0 for seven consecutive months, indicating an extended period of contraction in factory activity.

“In sum, weak economic conditions across the world is a challenge for policy makers in the months ahead.”

Source: Asha Bangalore, Northern Trust – Daily Global Commentary, January 2, 2009.

International Herald Tribune: Germany resists calls to spend its way out of trouble
“With battle lines sharpening, the German government appears determined to resist calls to spend an additional €40 billion to fight its way out of the recession, according to officials attending a meeting in the Chancellery in the past week.

“Chancellor Angela Merkel is being pulled in all directions as she plans a January 5 follow-up to a meeting of German government officials, business executives and union leaders she called two weeks ago to discuss ways to counter the recession.

“The business community, leaders of German states and other European Union nations are calling for the additional spending, which would amount to $56 billion. Industry chiefs, meanwhile, are calling for tax cuts.

“Merkel, facing federal elections in September, has said the focus of any spending measures must be preserving jobs. At the meeting two weeks ago, industry lobbyists promised to go along on that point, but now they have backed away even as they exert more pressure on her.

“The European Union, while weakening its criticism of Merkel’s cautious approach to dealing with the economic crisis, still wants the German government to do more because of its size: It has the largest economy in Europe.

“Merkel, so far, has kept the lobbyists, the state leaders and the EU guessing about her final package.”

Source: Judy Dempsey, International Herald Tribune, December 26, 2008.

Reuters: Further house price declines in store for UK
“Housing prices in England and Wales fell 8.7% in 2008, bringing the average price of a house to 159,900 pounds, property consultant Hometrack said in its monthly survey on Monday.

“At 0.9%, the pace of monthly decline eased slightly from November’s 1.1% drop, although prices have now fallen consistently over the last 15 months and 9.3% since the start of the credit crunch in August 2007.

“British house prices tripled in the 10 years running up to their peak in the middle of last year, but have since fallen as much as 15% in other surveys as the global financial crisis has caused the supply of mortgages to dry up.

“‘The onset of recession and the prospect of rising unemployment over 2009 will continue to dampen confidence and in turn demand, which will inevitably lead to further house price falls over the next 12 months,’ said Richard Donnell, director of research at Hometrack.

“Two other key indicators – time taken to sell a property and proportion of the asking price achieved – demonstrate the current weak housing market.

“Hometrack found the average time to sell a property in December was 12 weeks, up from 8.3 weeks a year ago and a low of six weeks in April 2007. The proportion of the asking price being achieved reached 88.6%, down from 93.5% a year ago, and well down on the high of 95.7% seen in April 2007.”

Source: Maureen Bavdek, Reuters, December 29, 2008.

US Global Investors: China’s manufacturing PMI remains in contraction
“According to CLSA, China’s manufacturing activity, responsible for 43% of the country’s GDP, contracted for a fifth month in December though the figures were an improvement from November. A sustained de-stocking cycle in the industrial sector has pushed the employment situation to a 56-month low, a tangible menace for consumer confidence and social stability.”

Source: US Global Investors – Weekly Investor Alert, January 2, 2009.

CNBC: Expect a V-shaped recovery in China
“Sun Mingchun, senior China economist at Nomura, sees a V-shaped recovery in China, with GDP growth starting to rise in the second-quarter of 2009. He explains his optimistic outlook to CNBC’s Martin Soong.”

video10-cnbc.jpg

Source: CNBC, December 29, 2008.

Bloomberg: Japanese economy may shrink 12.1%“Japan’s economy will probably shrink at an annual 12.1% pace this quarter, the sharpest drop since 1974, as exports collapse, Barclays Capital said.

“Gross domestic product in the three months ending tomorrow will fall at almost three times the 4.1% rate previously predicted, said Kyohei Morita, chief Japan economist at Barclays in Tokyo, after reports last week showed industrial production and exports posted the biggest declines on record in November.

“‘Given the speed and the length of the contraction, this recession could be the most severe in the postwar era,’ Morita said. ‘We expect negative growth will continue for a fifth straight quarter to the April-June period of 2009.’

“A 12.1% annualized contraction would be the steepest since the first quarter of 1974, when the oil shock caused the economy to shrink 13.1%, according to Barclays.”

Source: Keiko Ujikane and Tatsuo Ito, Bloomberg, December 30, 2008.

CEP News: Singapore GDP contracts more than expected
“Singapore’s preliminary gross domestic product (GDP) contracted 12.5% in the fourth quarter, against expectations for a 3.4% quarter-over-quarter contraction and the upwardly revised 5.4% decrease seen in the third quarter, originally reported as -6.3%.

“GDP was down 2.6% year over year, against a 0.3% annual decline in the third quarter.

“The report, released by Singapore’s Ministry of Trade and Industry Friday morning said the sharpest annual declines were in the manufacturing sector, down 9.0% from one year ago. The construction sector was up 13.3% annually and the services and producing component was up 1.1%.”

Source: CEP News, January 2, 2009.

US Global Investors: Brazil’s manufacturing confidence plunges
“The Brazilian Manufacturing Industry Survey compiled by the Getúlio Vargas Foundation in Brazil revealed a significant decline in the seasonally-adjusted Industry Confidence Index, from 83.9 in November to 74.7 in December. This was the fourth consecutive decline in this leading indicator of economic activity. In December, the index fell to its second-lowest level since the data series was created in April 1995.”

brazilian-manufacturing-industry.jpg

Source: US Global Investors – Weekly Investor Alert, January 2, 2009.

Financial Times: Russia braced for unrest
“Russia is bracing for further unrest as the rouble on Friday slid to a new low against the euro after a succession of moves to devalue its currency.

“A cut on Friday extended six weeks of devaluations by Russia’s central bank designed to offset the impact of the global economic crisis and falling oil prices as the country’s main export commodity approached its lowest level since 2004.

“Mikhail Gorbachev, the former Soviet leader, warned Russia faced ‘unprecedentedly difficult and dangerous circumstances’ and could be ‘heading into a black hole’. ‘It is not clear what the fate of our rouble will be or if society has sufficient financial and moral resources,’ he said.

“After the depreciation, which was the eighth so far this month, the rouble declined as much as 1.2% to Rbs29.06 versus the dollar on Friday, a four year low. The rouble has now lost nearly 20% of its value against the US currency since August.

“Analysts at Barclays Capital said the best case scenario would see Russian policymakers, facing the mounting evidence of a recession, allowing a one-off depreciation of 10% or more.

“The rouble’s slide comes as the government faces scrutiny over its policies. A demonstration earlier this month in the far eastern city of Vladivostok marked the first major challenge to the Kremlin since the onset of the global financial crisis.

“Mikhail Sukhodolsky, a deputy interior minister, warned on Christmas Eve that there could be further protests. ‘The situation may be exacerbated by a growth in frustration of workers over the non-payment of wages or those threatened with dismissal,’ he said.

Source: Isabel Gorst and Anuj Gangahar, Financial Times, December 26, 2008.

The New York Times: Russia cuts off gas deliveries to Ukraine
“In the face of mounting economic troubles, Russia cut off deliveries of natural gas to Ukraine on Thursday after Ukraine rejected the Kremlin’s demands for a sharp increase in gas prices.

“A similar reduction in supplies to Ukraine in 2006 caused a drop in pressure throughout Europe’s integrated natural gas pipeline system and led to shortages in countries as far away as Italy and France.

“But with a recessionary drop in demand, ample supplies and assurances from both countries that gas would flow westward without interruption, there were few signs of the near hysteria in Europe that accompanied the 2006 cutoff.

“Even Ukraine, which says it has enough gas in reserve to last through the winter, took Russia’s action in stride, underscoring how the political potency of the Kremlin’s energy card has plunged along with the price of oil and gas.

“Gazprom, the Russian natural gas monopoly, likened its actions to a utility cutting off service to a deadbeat customer. “The message is very simple,” Ilya Y. Kochevrin, the executive director of Gazprom’s export arm, Gazexport, said in a telephone interview. ‘If you receive a product, you have to pay for it. If you don’t pay, you don’t receive it.’

“But energy experts said that the Kremlin’s decision to employ the gambit again in a pricing dispute with Ukraine was an indication as well of Russia’s deepening economic woes.”

Source: Andrew Kramer, The New York Times, January 2, 2009.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Bonds, Commodities, Credit Markets, Economy, Emerging Markets, Energy & Natural Resources, Gold, India, Markets, Oil and Gas, Outlook, US Stocks | Comments Off


Baltic Dry Index: A Valuable Leading Indicator?


Friday, December 5th, 2008

The Baltic Dry Index is a very important indicator of the health of trade globally, as it measures shipping activity in dry cargo.

Take a look at the chart below: According to the BDI, one of the purest economic indicators, the activity of shipping dry bulk cargo, mainly consisting of commodities such as coal, steel, iron ore, and cement, has almost completely ground to a halt, as indicated by the crash in the index’s value.

View the full BALDRY chart at Wikinvest

The BDI offers a real time glimpse at global raw material and infrastructure demand. Unlike stock and commodities markets, the Baltic Dry Index is totally devoid of speculative players. The trading is limited only to the member companies, and the only relevant parties securing contracts are those who have actual cargo to move and those who have the ships to move it. [1]

Another interesting feature of the BDI, is its high correlation to equity markets. Take a look at BDI vs. S&P500 and FXI (China 25 Index iShare), Crude Oil and Copper:

Baltic Dry Index vs. S&P 500

Baltic Dry Index vs. S&P500

Baltic Dry Index vs. FXI (FTSE Xinhua 25 Index iShare)

Baltic Dry Index vs. FXI (FTSE Xinhua China 25 iShare)

Baltic Dry Index vs. Crude Oil

BDI vs. Crude Oil

Baltic Dry Index vs. Copper

BDI vs. Copper


We’ll keep an eye on credit markets, and the Baltic Dry Index as indicators of the vitality (or lack thereof) of the economy and markets and keep you posted.

As goes the BDI (a leading indicator), so goes the economy, and perhaps equity markets (and commodities, we might add).

At the time of the publishing of this article, the BDI stands at 663 pts.



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Commodities, Credit Markets, Economy, Energy & Natural Resources, Infrastructure, Markets, Oil and Gas | Comments Off


Asset Class Correlations


Tuesday, July 22nd, 2008

July 22, 2008 – (Courtesy: Bespoke Investment Group) Today’s Wall Street Journal had an interesting article about asset class correlations.  With that in mind, below we highlight (click here for PDF) a correlation matrix of various asset classes including the S&P 500 sectors, oil, gold, the dollar, the yen, emerging markets, the 10-year note and the FTSE 100.  The first matrix highlights the correlation between the daily percent changes of asset classes since the S&P 500 peaked on October 9th, 2007.  Each column (vertical) is color coded from green to red based on highest to lowest correlations.

The second matrix highlights the correlations between the same asset classes, only from a much longer time horizon (1990-present).  Then, in the bottom chart, we highlight the difference between the short-term and long-term correlations to see where differences arise.  Correlations that have increased since the bear market began in 10/07 are shaded in light green, while correlations that have decreased are shaded in light red.  In each column, the biggest increase and decrease in correlation is highlighted in dark green or red.  As shown, correlations have generally increased among sectors, while stocks have become less correlated with oil, gold and Treasuries.  Correlations between stocks and the yen have increased the most in the short-term compared to their long-term correlations.  To view the matrices in PDF form, please click here.  It’s definitely an interesting data set to analyze and it’s better to let the info speak for itself.

Correlation721

Thanks Bespoke.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Emerging Markets, Energy & Natural Resources, Gold, Markets, Oil and Gas | Comments Off


International Markets Snapshot


Tuesday, June 24th, 2008

June 24, 2008 – Courtesy of Bespoke Investment Group – The recent selloff in equities has really spared no one.  As shown in our trading range charts below of 22 major country indices, the trend has been down across the board in recent weeks.  Even Brazil, Mexico and Russia, who had all held up relatively well this year, have sold off quite a bit. Currently, 19 of the 22 countries are trading in oversold territory (Canada, Japan and Russia are neutral).  European countries like France, Germany and Italy have really taken it on the chin, while China and India remain the biggest losers in 2008.  After forming short-term uptrends off of the March lows, global equity markets have now lost most of their gains and are looking to move back into downtrends.

Austbraz

Canachin

Honggerm

Franindi

Italjapa

Malaspx5

Mexiruss

Singsout

Swedspai

Soutswit

Taiwftse

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Markets | Comments Off


How Solid are the BRICs? (Part 2)


Sunday, February 3rd, 2008

Feb. 3, 2008 – The nature of the economic strength and stability of the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) countries is a less well known or understood fact among investors. There remains a wide gap between perceptions and reality.

Remember 1997 and 1998? Many investors, excited about the growth of Asian and emerging countries in the late nineties and invested their money found out about credit related risk first when the 1997 ‘Asian Contagion’ occurred and was followed upon by the Long Term Capital Management bailout which unfolded in 1998. These events destabilized global markets and investors were taken by surprise as markets melted down.

For this reason, its important to go back to that time and re-examine Malaysia and Thailand, as examples, of where investors were excited by the rapid economic growth, but ignored the then inherent high credit risk, much to their expense. A decade ago (yes, a decade ago) when all of this was happening, only 3% of the grand total of emerging markets sovereign debt was rated as investment grade by any of the ratings agencies.

In 1997, only 10 out of 120 companies that form the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, had ADRs. 

Excited by the G7 debt-financed growth, investors made bets that were inherently risky to their preservation of capital, not simply volatile. Circa 1997, emerging markets were in debt to the industrialized world by about $100-billion in the current account deficit column, and dependent on the kindness of their G7 financiers.

When the Malay and Thai governments were unable to meet current account obligations, and started printing money in order to meet them, the Fed blew the whistle upon discovering that sufficient reserves were not available to support the currency valuations. Hence the overnight slashing of Asian currencies.

At best, the general sentiment surrounding emerging markets has remained sceptical, and for this reason, as fundamentally sound as the BRIC countries economies are today, the market has been adopting the BRIC investment story very gradually. This time though, it is credit worthiness that is being overlooked.

 

Source: Merrill Lynch October 2006

 

Source: Merrill Lynch, October 2006

Today, emerging markets sit atop a current account surplus in excess of $700-billion, and it is the industrialized G7 who are in debt, by the same amount. Longer term surpluses in excess of $3-trillion are to be found on the balance sheets of mostly the BRIC countries today in the form of Foreign Exchange surpluses, and trade surpluses. China alone now nurses a trade and forex surplus nearing US$1.5-tillion. Russia, has managed to build up reserves of US$450-billion as well as Putin’s US$150-billion ‘contigency’ fund, set aside so that it may sidestep any kind of financial shock. India has amassed a forex surplus of around US$275-billion. Brazil’s forex reserves now stand at US$178-billion.

BRIC countries have been financing the debt, and driving the growth of G7 countries for the last 5-7 years. China has emerged as the worlds manufacturing hub, while India has come on very strong as its counterpart hub in services, both providing Western firms access to inexpensive educated and -or- highly-skilled labour. Russia, under Putin, has successfully emerged as a highly profitable energy and raw materials producer, second in oil and gas reserves to Saudi Arabia. Brazil has changed the regional balance in the Americas by turning itself into the winds of east-west trade in hard and soft commodities and using its strength to bolster its new economic clout in relation to North America. 

China’s growth is less dependent on the health of the US economy, as is commonly perceived. A recent Economist article points out that China’s true exports-to-GDP ratio is actually below 10%, that China has been quite successful to date at rebalancing its economy in favour of domestic growth as a driver. As for India, 87% of its GDP is consumed domestically, making it quite independent from the risk of the US threatened consumer hegemony. Russians are enjoying three times the disposable income of 7 years ago and driving consumption growth, as are Brazilians.

North American and European companies are looking to these consumers to drive demand and growth to their top and bottom lines.

In a word, things have changed.

They have changed in a very meaningful, very important way. The relationship that now exists between emerging markets and G7 countries is ‘symbiotic.’ and interdependent.

Source: Merrill Lynch, October 2006 

Today, around 60-70% of emerging markets sovereign debt is investment grade rated and all 120 companies that form the key MSCI Emerging Markets Index have ADR listings.

In 1997-1998, the world’s biggest western banks took advantage of bailout conditions to take ownership of Asian banks, once protected by thousand-year-old protectionist laws. Today, powerful and wealthy Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) are bailing out the same banks, Citigroup, Merrill Lynch, and Morgan Stanley.

On Wall Street in the past few weeks, the sums have been bigger and the actions more benign—at least so far. This week Merrill Lynch and Citigroup became the latest to get the sovereign-wealth treatment, picking up a further $6.6 billion and $14.5 billion respectively, much of it from governments in Asia and the Middle East (see article). Sapped by the subprime crisis, rich-world financial-services groups have been administered nearly $69 billion-worth of infusions from the savings of the developing world in the past ten months, according to Morgan Stanley.

 

SWFs

  

Commodities are not the only source of sovereign wealth. Many Asian emerging markets have been running current-account surpluses at the same time as they have been managing their exchange rates. As they have mopped up dollars, using government bonds, they have accumulated reserves. At first these went into safe, liquid assets like American Treasury bonds—the Asian financial crisis of 1997-98 was still a recent memory and many countries were keen to amass reserves. But economies like China, South Korea and Taiwan now have more reserves than they need to defend themselves against shocks. Their governments understandably want to earn a higher return than Treasury bonds will pay, so they create a fund to manage their assets. Source: The Economist, Jan. 17, 2008, Asset-Backed Insecurity

It has become such that neither Emerging Markets nor the G7 can allow each other to be destabilized, as evidenced by the large, noted, SWF investments, as they have each other’s economic ‘lives’ in the balance.

You might get the idea that emerging markets are correlated more to the US than they actually are, when you see that they have suffered like western stock markets, from a selloff. Their correlation is low, between .30 and .40, not zero or negative. There are those who would have us believe that the decoupling thesis is suffering from the same disease as the bull market. Those are probably the same folks, who last year began to re-write their theses from decoupling to recoupling to suit themselves this year, as the need to raise cash by selling the last two year’s profitable trades became an increasingly inevitable requirement, in order to shore up balance sheets.

Our expectation is that the credit squeeze ailing the market will come to a reversal point, at some point over the next 2-4 weeks as the banks round the corner on the cash call that has forced the wholesale liquidation of emerging markets and commodities related investing.

Emerging Markets are strong, and some of their [inflationary] growth pressures may get somewhat solved by a slowdown in the US, in the form of an imported soft landing. This is by no means advice, but if you subscribe to this thesis, then there is reason (for those of us on the buy-side) to believe that there will be a recovery in the decoupling thesis, and thus emerging markets equities throughout the second half of the year, from the current lows.

First, however, until the cash call is complete, and the future of the monoline insurers (MBIA, ABK) is resolved in the form of perhaps a bailout, we may continue to see more downside.

Now may prove to be a good time to nibble at emerging markets and commodities again and add or gain exposure as they are far more attractively priced. Here are a variety of ETFs and open ended funds (Canadian fund companies with offerings) that provide broad (diversified) and narrow exposure (country and regional funds) to BRIC and emerging markets.

On the AMEX

“Total” Emerging Markets ETFs
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index Fund (EEM)
PowerShares FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Portfolio (PXH)
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ETF (GMM)
Vanguard Emerging Markets ETF (VWO)
   
Dividend Emerging Markets ETFs
WisdomTree Emerging Markets High-Yielding Fund (DEM)

Multi-Region (but not Total) Emerging Markets ETFs
BLDRS Emerging MKTS 50 ADR Index Fund (ADRE)
Claymore/BNY BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) ETF (EEB)
streetTRACKS SPDR S&P BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) 40 ETF (BIK)
iShares MSCI BRIC Index Fund (BKF)

Latin America Regional ETFs
iShares S&P Latin America 40 Index Fund (ILF)
SPDR S&P Emerging Latin America ETF (GML)

European Emerging Markets Regional ETFs
SPDR S&P Emerging Europe ETF (GUR)
Middle East and Africa Regional ETFs
SPDR S&P Emerging Middle East & Africa ETF (GAF)

India – Barclays iPath India ETN (INP)

On the Toronto Stock Exchange
Claymore BRIC ETF  (CBQ.T)
Open Ended Funds (Canadian)

Broad Mandate Emerging Markets

Tmpleton Emerging Markets
AGF Emerging Markets
Pro FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index
TD Emerging Markets 
United-Emerging Markets Pool Cl A
CI Emerging Markets
United-Emerging Markets Pool Cl W
BMO Emerging Markets
Brandes Emerging Markets Equity
CIBC Emerging Markets Index
National Bank Emerging Markets

Region/Country Mandates
Excel India Fund
Excel China Fund
Excel Chindia Fund
Excel Emerging Europe Fund
Templeton BRIC Fund

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Bonds, Commodities, Credit Markets, Emerging Markets, ETFs, Markets, Oil and Gas, Outlook | Comments Off


Short ETFs – Portfolio insurance


Tuesday, January 29th, 2008

Jan. 29, 2008 – Short and UltraShort Funds provide investors with highly liquid inverse exposure to the markets as represented by widely held benchmark indices.

Check out these charts for a couple of good examples. Most investors have difficulty grasping the idea of taking ’short’ positions or bets against the very markets that they are investing in. These new ’short’ ETFs do not require a great deal of sophistication or a margin account for the average investor to get some portfolio insurance.

iShares FTSE Xinhua 25 (FXI) vs. ProShares UltraShort FTSE Xinhua 25 (FXP)


iShares MSCI Emerging Markets (EEM) vs. ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM)

EEM vs. EUM

 

 ProShares Ultra Financials vs. Proshares UltraShort Financials (Dow Jones Financial Index(sm))

UYG vs. SKF 

If you believe that there is more downside to come, then its still not too late to get some downside protection.

Don Coxe, in his recommendations from Basic Points, January 2008, warns:

The financial crisis is not centered in stock markets. Its primary locus is in financial derivatives, and in their impact on the stock prices of leading banks. Until the downward drift of bank stocks and the upward drift of derivative debt yields are reversed, the stock market will continue to slide. Keep overall equity exposure to minimums, and emphasize quality.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Emerging Markets, ETFs, US Stocks | Comments Off


More volatility coming and more ETF options


Friday, January 25th, 2008

Jan. 25, 2008 – Watch out below. There is sure to be more volatility to the downside in the coming weeks, as the carry trade and proprietary traders continue to unwind profitable trades.

Finding themselves unable to collect on credit default swaps vis-a-vis AMBAC, MBIA, ACA, large institutions (banks) and hedge funds are finding themselves under pressure from a substantial cash call.

An example of this danger came to light when a little-known firm called ACA Financial Guaranty caused some of Wall Street’s biggest banks to write down billions of dollars in holdings, restating their value on corporate balance sheets. ACA revealed last month that it had promised to cover $60 billion worth of mortgage and corporate debt, but had enough cash to cover only a fraction of that. Merrill Lynch, Citigroup and financial institutions in Canada and France, which had all sold swaps to ACA, set aside billions in case the firm collapsed.

Most of the strength that the market is witnessing is due to short covering and this will manifest itself over and over during the next two to four weeks.

Institutions are still unwinding their profitable trades to raise cash. The market goes down. Then short covering occurs, and you get what appears to be a bounce or recovery in stock prices. The problem is that as long as the cash call remains larger than the outstanding short positions the market will continue to trend lower.

Don Coxe, in January’s Basic Points, puts it in these terms:

Sadly, the central bankers have been forced into injections of all-time record amounts of liquidity. Jim Cramer and some other prominent apologists for Wall Street glitterati screamed, “The Fed doesn’t get it,” and demanded bailouts for their buddies who faced demotion from Croesus status to morally cretinous status. The biggest benefi ciaries from these bailouts were not overstressed homeowners, but the biggest, baddest, borrowers who had made the biggest, baddest, bets through use of complex derivatives.

Despite strong openings today, both the Dow and TSX look unable to hang on to gains. You also have to look at trading volume for clues about the weakness of the recovery. Volumes are down 20% at the NYSE and 15% at NASDAQ.

Assuming you agree with the idea that there is more downside in the market, there are some relatively new and interesting ways that you can take positions on the short side to reduce downside that do not involve derivatives or short positions. In particular there are a new breed of ETFs that provide short exposure to various sectors and country bets. These are aptly referred to as ’short’ and ’double-short’ ETFs.

ProShares has created ETF’s that trade inversely with the markets. These allow investors and traders to hedge against market downturns or that want to bet against the market. These ETFs are very liquid and actively traded and are designed to go up when indexes go down. As a reminder, the SHORT funds use no leverage, but the UltraShort funds employ leverage. Here is partial list by Fund (Ticker):

  • UltraShort QQQ (AMEX: QID)
  • UltraShort Dow30 (AMEX: DXD)
  • UltraShort S&P500 (AMEX: SDS)
  • UltraShort MidCap400 (AMEX: MZZ)
  • UltraShort SmallCap600 (AMEX: SDD)
  • UltraShort Russell2000 (AMEX: TWM)
  • UltraShort MSCI EAFE (AMEX: EFU)
  • UltraShort FTSE/Xinhua China 25 (AMEX: FXP)… short selling FTSE Xinhua 25 index (FXI).
  • UltraShort Basic Materials (AMEX: SMN)
  • UltraShort Consumer Goods (AMEX: SZK)
  • UltraShort Consumer Services (AMEX: SCC)
  • UltraShort Financials (AMEX: SKF)
  • UltraShort Health Care (AMEX: RXD)
  • UltraShort Industrials (AMEX: SIJ)
  • UltraShort Oil & Gas (AMEX: DUG)
  • UltraShort Real Estate (AMEX: SRS)
  • UltraShort Semiconductors (AMEX: SSG)
  • UltraShort Technology (AMEX: REW)
  • UltraShort Utilities (AMEX: SDP)
  • Short MSCI Emerging Markets (AMEX:EUM)
  • Short MSCI EAFE (AMEX: EFZ)
  • Short QQQ (AMEX: PSQ)
  • Short Dow30 (AMEX: DOG)
  • Short S&P500 (AMEX: SH)
  • Short MidCap400 (AMEX: MYY)
  • Short SmallCap600 (AMEX: SBB)
  • Short Russell2000 (AMEX: RWM)

On the TSX in Canada, Horizons BetaPro Funds have launched ‘double-short’ ETFs that trade inversely with the market (they also have corresponding ‘double-bull’ versions of these). Canadian investors and traders can use these to protect against downturns or simply bet against the market.

  • Horizons BetaPro COMEX® Gold Bullion Bear Plus ETF (TSX: HBD)
  • Horizons BetaPro S&P/TSX Global Mining® Bear Plus ETF (TSX: HMD)
  • Horizons BetaPro DJ-AIGSM Agricultural Grains Bear Plus (TSX: ETF HAD)
  • Horizons BetaPro S&P/TSX 60® Bear Plus ETF (TSX: HXD)
  • Horizons BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials® Bear Plus ETF (TSX: HFD)
  • Horizons BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Energy® Bear Plus ETF (TSX: HED)
  • Horizons BetaPro S&P/TSX Global Gold® Bear Plus ETF (TSX: HGD)
  • Horizons BetaPro NYMEX® Natural Gas Bear Plus ETF (TSX: HND)
  • Horizons BetaPro NYMEX® Crude Oil Bear Plus ETF (TSX: HOD)
  • Horizons BetaPro COMEX® Gold Bullion Bear Plus ETF (TSX: HBD)
  • Horizons BetaPro S&P/TSX Global Mining® Bear Plus ETF (TSX: HMD)

Look at it this way; if you already have long positions that have appreciated, but you’ve got a longer term holding period in mind that is not determined by market conditions, this may a viable option to capture some of the potential downside.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Canadian Market, Commodities, Credit Markets, Emerging Markets, ETFs, Gold, Markets, Oil and Gas, Outlook, US Stocks | Comments Off


More Carry-Trade commentary


Tuesday, January 22nd, 2008

Jan. 22, 2008 – Here are some more clippings about the ‘carry-trade’ at the heart of global market volatility:

Jan. 21 (Bloomberg) — The Australian and New Zealand dollars fell against the yen as concern over a slowing U.S. and global economy spurred a reduction in holdings of higher- yielding assets bought with funds from Japan.

The New Zealand currency traded near the lowest in almost two months versus the yen as a slump in Asian stocks deterred investors from so-called carry trades. Australia’s dollar also declined against the U.S. currency after a government report showed producer prices rose by less than economists estimated, prompting traders to pare bets the central bank will raise interest rates from an 11-year high next month.

Inserted from http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601081&sid=ah9E711dlJh4&refer=australia

Australia’s 11-year high benchmark rate of 6.75 percent and New Zealand’s record 8.25 percent rate drew investors in the past as part of the carry trade strategy. Those rates compare to 0.5 percent in Japan. The risk in the carry trade is that swings in exchange rates erode profits from interest-rate differentials.

The carry trade strategy involves borrowing in countries where interest rates are low, and investing where returns are higher.

Commodities, which make up about 60 percent of Australian exports and 70 percent of New Zealand’s, tumbled since the beginning of last week. Falling global economic growth may reduce demand for commodities these countries export, such as metals.

Inserted from http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601081&sid=a3dRGK0srjXo&refer=australia

Another nervous week as the ‘carry trade’ unwinds. Many equity indices and Yen crosses are poised at key support levels: ‘necklines’ of ‘head-and-shoulders’ patterns or the lower edge of the big trading band of the last year or so. Leading the pack South are GBP/JPY and Sweden’s OMX Index, closely followed by the Dow Jones Industrial Average and FTSE 100. These have already seen weekly closes below these key levels and should, one by one, topple all the other ones over too. An unseemly scramble is likely if not next week then in February; at-the-money implied volatility could soar.

Energy products and most metals eased, many thinking if not talking recession, and Baltic Dry and Capesize Freight Indices have halved since their peak at the end of last year. Even the more pessimistic are saying contraction will be shallow and short and that by Q3 2008 things will be mended and economic growth will pick up. We feel this is way too simplistic and that the unravelling of all the mess in the financial system will probably take the whole of this year (and then some more).

A ‘flight to quality’ has resulted in Treasury yields moving lower, US ones leading the way to multi-month lows with yield curve steepening seeing two-year TNotes at a mere 2.39% (lowest yield since September 2004). Credit spreads against junk bunds are at July’s record highs. The US dollar has been contained in relatively small ranges around last week’s levels although the Swiss franc did dip very briefly to a new record low (1.0838) as did the Czech koruna (17.318). Sterling has regained some of its composure, EUR/GBP down from a record £0.7614, and the Yen had the best all round performance, dipping to 105.92 to the greenback.

Stock indices are all lower, the New Zealand bourse for a staggering twelve consecutive days while Jakarta and Mumbai are down nearly 8% this week alone. US and European indices lost roughly 5%, many now lower than they were at any point in 2007.

Inserted from <http://www.fxstreet.com/technical/market-view/weekly-market-commentary/2008-01-21.html

The Japanese currency climbed against higher yielding currencies as investors looked for safe havens amid the turbulence in equity markets. The yen carry trade, where the low-yielding currency is sold to purchase riskier, high-yielding assets, proved a popular investment strategy in the first half of 2007 as stable equity market conditions ensured a healthy appetite for risk.

But the deepening financial market gloom since August has seen carry trades scaled back since the beginning of this year.

The real test of carry trade activity is the relationship between the yen and the New Zealand dollar. The yen fell 15 per cent against the Kiwi between January and August last year as the latter’s interest rate hit 8.25 per cent against Japan’s 0.5 per cent. But the Kiwi has since lost nearly all these gains, and was down 4 per cent this week to Y82.05 as the yen continued its rally.

Inserted from <http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0600819a-c634-11dc-8378-0000779fd2ac.html

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Commodities, Credit Markets, Markets, US Stocks | Comments Off