One Chart Republicans Do Not Want You To See (Bespoke)

Friday, September 7th, 2012

by Bespoke Investment Group

Barack Obama is all set to make his case at the Democratic National Convention for why Americans should give him a second term in office.  One chart that you are unlikely to see (but should) is a comparison of his first 1,325 days in office to other Presidents since 1900.  As shown in the chart below, the Dow Jones Industrial Average has risen 66.8% since Obama took office, making it the fifth best stock market return during a President’s first 1,325 days in office since 1900.  The only four other Presidents who saw better returns in their first 1,325 days were FDR, Coolidge, Eisenhower, and Clinton.

While the stock market returns during his time in office are impressive enough, an even more interesting statistic is how the equity market has performed during the first 1,325 days in office for Democrats versus Republicans.  Of the eleven Republicans since 1900, the DJIA has averaged a gain of 20.4% during their first 1,325 days in office.  That may sound good, but for the eight Democratic Presidents since 1900, the DJIA has seen an average return of 54.9%, or more than two and a half times the average return of Republicans!  While President Obama may have a hard time running for re-election based on the performance of the economy, he could certainly run on the performance of the market.

Copyright © Bespoke Investment Group

Posted in Markets | Comments Off

Recent Asset Class Performance (Bespoke)

Friday, September 7th, 2012

Tags: ETF, ETFs, Technology
Posted in Markets | Comments Off

Bearish is Bullish (Bradley)

Friday, September 7th, 2012

By Tom Bradley, Steadyhand Investment Funds

There was an article by David Berman in the Report on Business yesterday pointing out how bearish Wall Street strategists are these days (Time to Buy as Pros Turn Bearish). As a group, their recommended stock weighting is 44.4%, which is near its lowest level since 1985. This compares to a long-term average of 60-65%.

In the article, Mr. Berman asks whether this is a bullish indicator for the market? For Savita Subramanian, the head of U.S. equity and quantitative strategy at Bank of America, the answer is yes. She points out that when the indicator has been below 50, the market over the next 12 months has been positive 100% of the time.

I talk a lot about market sentiment in this space. It’s the third element of any analysis I do (after fundamentals and valuation). For any investor, it’s a good check and balance. When everyone is bearish, the downside risk is more limited because most of the distressed selling has been done. If the fundamentals and valuation are reasonable, it’s a time to have a bias towards buying, not selling. As Ms. Subramanian notes, however, the market’s mood is just one of many indicators investors should look at.

So where was the strategist indicator in 2009 when the market went on one of the great runs of all-time? As you can see from the chart (source: BofA Merrill Lynch), it was also showing the strategists were extremely bearish … which of course is bullish.

Posted in Markets | Comments Off

Euro: Looks Like a Duck, Quacks Like a Duck (Merk)

Friday, September 7th, 2012

by Axel Merk, Merk Funds

If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it just might be a duck. We are talking about the euro: it now looks like a currency, acts like a currency, it might as well be yet another currency. The new framework of the European Central Bank (ECB) morphs the euro from a currency of nations to a currency of the United States of Europe. This has major implications on how to value the euro and with it, the U.S. dollar and other currencies.

Going forward, as weak nations in the Eurozone ask for help, they cede sovereign control over their budgets. In return, the ECB is ready to deploy its (unlimited) resources to lower their respective costs of borrowing. Crucial in this context is that politicians in the Eurozone, not the ECB, approve the help. Also crucial is that the ECB ‘conditionality’ merely requires, as ECB President Draghi puts it “broad lines, leaving it up to the governments themselves what the precise shape is.”

Many rightfully point out that this may simply help weak countries to ‘kick the can down the road’, or even to hold stronger countries hostage: think Spain that thinks it has done enough and will ‘demand’ help without engaging in further structural reform. No kidding. And indeed, the silver lining of the high cost of borrowing has been that major structural reform was pursued because of the “encouragement” of the bond market. But what does it mean for the euro?

When it comes to the U.S. dollar, British pound, Japanese yen, the respective central bank’s policies guide the short-term borrowing costs for their governments. In the Eurozone, there’s “fragmentation” as weaker countries have a substantially higher cost of borrowing than stronger ones; in ECB President Draghi’s words, the “monetary transmission mechanism” is broken. The new policy addresses that by providing a mechanism to have such rates converge. But he is not only imposing a rate convergence, he is also imposing a political convergence given the requirement that governments give up sovereign control over their budgets.

What one ends up with is what one would expect from a central bank: borrowing costs more in line with what the central banks like to see. Draghi correctly points out that the new framework will only be effective if supported by sustainable fiscal policy. But he also points out that this is a challenge no different from the challenge of any other central bank.

There’s only so much that monetary policy can do; central banks cannot solve fiscal problems. We can only hope that the Federal Reserve has tuned in and heeds that advice. Fiscal issues must keep politicians busy – that’s what they are elected to do. We may not be satisfied with the state of fiscal affairs in the Eurozone, but are we satisfied with the state of fiscal affairs in the U.S.? In the U.K.? In Japan? The Eurozone is growing up, but that doesn’t mean fiscal challenges will evaporate.

The European Central Bank, in its own words, has created an “effective backstop to remove tail risk from the euro area.” That is correct and justifies the rally we have seen in the euro in recent weeks in anticipation of today’s announcement. Money has been flowing from pricey currencies that benefited from the “everything but the euro” trade, including the U.S. dollar, to the euro. As this new framework settles in, we expect to see further euro appreciation.

Thereafter, we can look at the euro like any other currency with all the good and bad that comes with it. We don’t expect a disengagement of the rather activist approach by policy makers. As such, the currency market will, in our assessment, remain a formidable place where the ‘mania of policy makers’ will be reflected. Such activism is not good for capital allocation, but that’s a global, not a Eurozone challenge. While the U.S. is busy contemplating QEn+1, the Eurozone will provide stimulus by lowering the borrowing cost of peripheral Eurozone countries. If the promised sterilization of the ECB’s Outright Monetary Transactions (OMT), as the new program is called, is implemented effectively, the U.S. Dollar might get a mighty competitor, even as we continue to be confronted with politicians the world over ducking the tough choices.

Please sign up to our newsletter to be informed as we discuss global dynamics and their impact on gold and currencies. Please also follow me on Twitter to receive real-time updates on the economy, currencies, and global dynamics.

Axel Merk
President and Chief Investment Officer, Merk Investments
Merk Investments, Manager of the Merk Funds

This report was prepared by Merk Investments LLC, and reflects the current opinion of the author. It is based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any investment security, nor provide investment advice.

Posted in Markets | Comments Off

Continue Hold: Gold, Gold Miners, Energy Sector, and Software

Friday, September 7th, 2012

Interesting Charts

Surprising strength yesterday in equity markets! Most of the upside technical action occurred following released of the August ADP report that substantially exceeded consensus. (Equity markets briefly sold off after Draghi’s news conference, but quickly regained momentum thereafter). Traders quickly began raising estimates for August Non-farm Payrolls to be released today at 8:30 AM EDT. A word of caution! The Non-farm Payroll report is infamous for its variability to consensus and for its revisions. Major U.S. equity indices broke August 21^st highs to reach multi-year highs.

European equity markets led the advance with 3% gains.

Economically sensitive sectors led gains in the U.S. Consumer Discretionary and Technology SPDRs broke to new highs.

Health Care SPDRs closed at an all-time high.

Updates on Seasonal Trades Recommended Since July

July 2 Accumulate the Software sector

ETF: IGV at $62.18. Current price: $65.32

Comment: Technicals remain positive. Intermediate trend is up. Nice breakout yesterday above short term resistance at $64.12. Units remain above their 20, 50 and 200 day moving averages. Strength relative to the S&P 500 Index remains positive. Continue to hold.

July 6: Accumulate gold bullion

Gold price: $1,578.90. Current price: $1,705.60

Comment: Technicals remain positive. Gold remains above its 20, 50 and 200 day moving averages (Completed a “golden cross” yesterday). Strength relative to the S&P 500 Index remains positive. Continue to hold.

July 13: Accumulate Canadian gold equities

ETF: XGD at $18.01. Current price: $20.10.

Comment: Technicals remain positive. Nice pop in volume today. Units remain above their 20 and 50 day moving averages. Strength relative to the TSX Composite Index and S&P 500 Index remains positive. Continue to hold.

July 20: Accumulate the Canadian Energy sector

ETF: XEG: at $15.12. Current price: $16.13.

Comment: Technicals remain positive. Intermediate trend is up. Nice bounce from near the top of its reverse head and shoulder pattern. Units remains above their 50 day moving average and closed above their 20 and 200 day moving average yesterday. Strength relative to the TSX Composite Index is slightly negative. Continue to hold

July 27: Sell the Transportation Sector

Dow Jones Transportation Average at 5,126.65. Current price: 5,044.63

ETF: IYT at $91.56. Current price: $90.06.

Comment: Technicals remain negative. Units remain below their 20, 50 and 200 day moving averages. Strength relative to the S&P 500 Index remains negative despite yesterday’s strength. Continue to sell/avoid/short.

August 6: Sell the Airline sector

ETF: FAA at $28.66. Current price: $29.07

Comment: Technicals improved last week, but not sufficient to change a negative opinion. Units reached an 8 month low on Wednesday before recovering sharply yesterday. Units moved above their 20 and 200 day moving averages yesterday. However, intermediate trend remains down and strength relative to the S&P 500 Index remains negative. Continue to sell/avoid/short.

August 28: Sell the Semiconductor sector

Philadelphia Semiconductor Index: 397.04. Current price: 404.54

ETF: SMH at $32.83. Current price: $33.26

Comment: Technicals have improved since August 28^th following the sharp gain yesterday. The Index and its ETFs recovered above their 20 and 200 day moving averages. Intermediate trend is neutral. Strength relative to the S&P 500 Index remains negative. Continue to sell/avoid/short, but place stops just above recent highs (408.79 for the Index and $33.94 for the ETF).

Eric Wheatley’s Listed Options Column

Hi guys,

I got an email from Mr. Rol, well-known and respected denizen of our comments section. He was asking whether I could build a model portfolio here and update it, to show exactly what I do with options. My response was that I’d love to, but unfortunately it is risky from a compliance standpoint. Given that John (Mr. Hood to me) and I are portfolio managers who can act with discretion in managing our clients’ assets, we are held to a higher standard of fiduciary care. If a client sees our model portfolio outgaining his or her own (which is managed according to his or her own risk/return profile), we may get a complaint and an unhappy client. Complaints, even unfounded ones, can ruin a finance professional’s reputation. John likes having a good reputation (and I’d like to hold onto whatever weird reputation I may have). Hence, we can’t put up a model portfolio.

What I can do is to give a little insight into our use of covered calls. Depending on the client and his or her understanding of options, I’ll usually set a core allocation to broad indices which are covered with written calls. The other portion of the equity allocation will be set with low-cost ETFs which cover sectors or geographical regions we either like or need to be exposed to. We don’t cover these with calls, not because we don’t want to, but we are Canadian, we have Canadian clients who will be (or are) living off of Canadian dollars in retirement. Other than on the absolutely deepest and most highly-traded stocks, the Canadian options market is just too illiquid to do large options trades.

(Of course, there a couple clients who will be living a portion of their retired lives elsewhere; in which case we can diversify their assets by buying American stocks and cover them in an infinitely deeper options market).

The reason we HAVE to be exposed to other regions goes beyond diversification. China’s stock market has been getting killed for a while, but disregarding the world’s second largest economy which could rebound violently at any time is not productive. A small allocation to emerging markets provides us with exposure outside North America, which is important. The downside to this is that emerging market ETFs are, understandably, significantly more expensive in terms of management fees, so we keep the allocations reasonable in order to lower the overall management costs of a given portfolio.

Now, if I buy the broad market Canadian index which has liquid options (and which, by the way, I used to be a market-maker on), here is an example of the available options from which I can choose:

The XIUs are at $17.43 and we’re two weeks away from the September expiry. Here are a few of the calls:

Here, I guess I have to explain my back-of-a-napkin methodology:

· Time value for an out-of-the-money call (i.e. which has a strike price ABOVE the current price of the stock; which makes the option unprofitable to be struck by its holder at this time) is equal to its bid price. The time value of an in-the-money call is its bid price minus its intrinsic value (i.e. the amount the call’s holder would make right now if he or she were to strike it).

· Fees for our clients (an institutional brokerage’s transaction fees) are a straight three cents per share with a fixed floor of 1,000 shares. This gets deducted directly from an option’s bid price. Your direct broker may charge less. Your full-service broker most certainly charges one heck of a lot more. I’ll assume readers here don’t deal with a full-service broker, especially for options trades.

· Returns are a percentage of the call’s premium versus the purchase price of the stock (for out-of-the-money calls) or the time value divided by the option’s strike price (for in-the-money calls).

· I counted the number of weeks until the option’s expiry to determine the annual return (e.g. for the December 17.50 calls, I multiplied 2.81% by 52 weeks and divided by the 15 weeks remaining until the December expiry).

There are, of course, many other considerations, notably what I think the Canadian market will be doing over the course of the call’s lifetime and how implied volatilities are doing (whether they’re historically high or low and where I think they’re headed). In any case, you’ll notice that even on one of Canada’s most liquid and highly-traded options classes, there are still four to eight cents between the bid and the ask. This is actually pretty good, but they usually aren’t good for much more than 10-20 contracts. When you’re managing money for many clients, there’s a good reason you pay extra for institutional traders: they’ll find buyers for size without moving the price too much.

In the above table, you have to weigh the better risk mitigation conferred by in-the-money calls against the better potential returns conferred by out-of-the-money calls. This goes with your anticipation of how the markets will be doing over the coming months. In this particular case – indeed, in most cases – there is no absolute “right” call to sell. I always prefer selling nearer-term options if the transaction costs aren’t too onerous for two good reasons: a) the client’ll make more money over time and b) it’s easier to have a solid opinion on the markets over a shorter timeframe. Here, I’d be looking at the November 17.50s, because they seem to offer some reasonable juice in a market where options are historically cheap. The current stock price is a little too far away from the in-the-money strike price, so there isn’t enough downside protection in the form of time value to offset the lower returns. Of course, choosing the Novembers doesn’t mean that the Octobers or the Decembers are wrong; arguments in their favour can be made.

In selling the November 17.50s, I’m giving my client a 2.07% return for ten weeks. This 2.07% also protects a bit against a slide in the stock price. While it may not sound like a lot, using covered calls properly eventually brings in some reasonable returns (as I always mention, the 2.07% is the options market’s best estimation of the stock’s potential returns) for comparably low risk. Of course, this is in addition to the dividends which are paid out to ETF holders and minus the management fees, which for the XIUs is 0.17% per year.

I’ll come back at the November expiry to see how the call worked out (for you, Rol). Please note that this is a passive, low-cost, long-term strategy, so it can’t be really evaluated over the course of months no matter how successful (or not) it may turn out to be.

*****************

This Labour day week has brought about some great fortune for my family (no details shall be provided), but it does mean that the Twitter feed and the French-language blog have been silenced (I decided to pound this commentary out on Thursday morning, ‘cause I love you guys SOOOO much. Also, it takes significantly less effort than coming up with my weird stories and literary turns of phrase in Molière’s little language). Both will be back next week. For now, as you read this, I’ll be waking up with my rare but perfectly predictable Champagne headache.

…and no, dear ROCers, it hasn’t anything to do with an election.

Cheers!

Éric Wheatley, MBA, CIM

Associate Portfolio Manager, J.C. Hood Investment Counsel Inc.

eric@jchood.com

514.604.2829; 1.855.348.2829

Twitter: @jchood_eric_en

Blogue en français : gbsfinancier.blogspot.ca

*****************

Little known fact about John Charles Hood #42

John Charles Hood can open a bottle of Champagne in a manner unique to him which involves a dagger, a damp cloth and a particularly ruddy squirrel.

Special Free Services available through www.equityclock.com

Equityclock.com is offering free access to a data base showing seasonal studies on individual stocks and sectors. The data base holds seasonality studies on over 1000 big and moderate cap securities and indices.

To login, simply go to http://www.equityclock.com/charts/

Costco Wholesale Corporation (NASDAQ:COST) Seasonal Chart

FP Trading Desk Headlines

FP Trading Desk headline reads, “Three reasons the ECB’s bond buying plan isn’t the bazooka it seems”. Following is a link to the report:

http://business.financialpost.com/2012/09/06/3-reasons-the-ecbs-bond-buying-plan-isnt-the-bazooka-it-seems/

FP Trading Desk headline reads, “Close U.S. election bodes well for stocks”. Following is a link to the report:

http://business.financialpost.com/2012/09/06/close-u-s-election-bodes-well-for-stocks/

Disclaimer: Comments and opinions offered in this report at www.timingthemarket.ca are for information only. They should not be considered as advice to purchase or to sell mentioned securities. Data offered in this report is believed to be accurate, but is not guaranteed.

Don and Jon Vialoux are research analysts for Horizons Investment Management Inc. All of the views expressed herein are the personal views of the authors and are not necessarily the views of Horizons Investment Management Inc., although any of the recommendations found herein may be reflected in positions or transactions in the various client portfolios managed by Horizons Investment Management Inc

Horizons Seasonal Rotation ETF HAC September 6^th 2012

Tags: Bullion, Canadian, Canadian Market, Emerging Markets, ETF, ETFs, Gold Miners, Indices, Seasonal, Seasonal Trades, Seasonality, Technology, Vialoux
Posted in Markets | Comments Off