Posts Tagged ‘Step Approach’

The Project Management Approach to Building a Better Financial Advisory Business

Tuesday, March 13th, 2012

In busi­ness and in life, you are con­stantly man­ag­ing projects.  You could break your projects into three categories:

  • Per­sonal Projects
  • Fam­ily Projects
  • Busi­ness Projects

To achieve hap­pi­ness, you must have a good bal­ance between these three projects.  A cou­ple of my friends wrote a great book, Jug­gling Ele­phants, which describes this process really well.

By tak­ing a project man­age­ment approach to each of these cat­e­gories, we can get more done in less time and achieve the cor­rect balance.

As a finan­cial advi­sor, you jug­gle way too many tasks.  One big com­plaint that I have been hear­ing lately is “If I took inven­tory of all of the tasks that I need to com­plete, I would be totally over­whelmed and would not get any of them done.”

Just do the math.  Let’s say you have 100 clients who meet your ideal client pro­file and you are deliv­er­ing a com­pre­hen­sive wealth man­age­ment expe­ri­ence.  To prop­erly exe­cute the strat­egy, you need to review, find solu­tions, imple­ment and monitor:

  • Invest­ment
  • Retire­ment
  • Estate Plan­ning
  • Insur­ance or Risk Management
  • Tax
  • Children’s Edu­ca­tion
  • Busi­ness Succession

Some are more com­plex than the oth­ers, but it is safe to say that you are jug­gling a pretty big num­ber of tasks for each client.  Mul­ti­ply by 100!

Your abil­ity to man­age these tasks will deter­mine your level of client sat­is­fac­tion and even­tu­ally your client reten­tion and growth rates for your business.

Advi­sors have tra­di­tion­ally tried to use CRMs to man­age these tasks.  Unfor­tu­nately, it is like try­ing to use a your put­ter for driving.

Here is a step-by-step approach to tak­ing a project man­age­ment approach for man­ag­ing your clients‘ wealth man­age­ment projects:

  1. Stop try­ing to do wealth and finan­cial plan­ning in inten­sive multi-hour meet­ings.  It wears both you and your clients out, your clients become over­whelmed and it does not gen­er­ally lead to com­plete imple­men­ta­tion of all aspects of the finan­cial plan.
  2. Break you wealth man­age­ment pro­gram into the cat­e­gories above and either adapt your plan­ning soft­ware or develop a dis­cov­ery process for each category.
  3. Set up a sched­ule of meet­ings over a 12 to 24 month period for each client with a goal of hav­ing every aspect of the finan­cial or wealth plan fully imple­mented and monitored.
  4. Set up a series of Mile­stones to be com­pleted.  A typ­i­cal Mile­stone is com­ple­tion of dis­cov­ery, selec­tion and imple­men­ta­tion of solu­tions or strate­gies and iden­ti­fi­ca­tion of the best way to mon­i­tor the solu­tions and strategies.
  5. In each meet­ing, iden­tify tasks that need to be com­pleted and link them to the Mile­stones.  Assign tasks to an indi­vid­ual – you, a team mem­ber, another pro­fes­sional advi­sor (accoun­tant, estate spe­cial­ist, etc.) or a client and set a due date.  Assign­ing tasks in an orga­nized way will increase client engage­ment and improve satisfaction.
  6. Stress to your team mem­bers the impor­tance of com­plet­ing tasks on time and report­ing com­ple­tion sta­tus.  Have daily meet­ings to dis­cuss the project lists and any prob­lems to help team mem­bers to com­plete tasks on time and to everybody’s satisfaction.

By tak­ing a project man­age­ment approach, you will def­i­nitely iden­tify more work for you and your team but you will be able to achieve more in a frac­tion of the time.  Imag­ine that all you need to do each day is to come in to the office, ful­fill your client con­tact and task oblig­a­tions and go home.

We have devel­oped a tech­no­log­i­cal solu­tion – Client Roadmap to help you man­age this process.  Visit www​.clien​troadmap​.com and watch our 2-minute video on how to how to more effec­tively col­lab­o­rate with your clients.

Get more done, bet­ter sat­isfy your clients and get back on a pos­i­tive growth track.

Bob Simp­son is Pres­i­dent of Syn­chronic­ity Per­for­mance Con­sul­tants.  Bob can be reached on his direct line at 905−502−0100, toll free at 866−646−6002 or by e-mail at bob.simpson@synchronicity.ca.

About Bob Simpson

Syn­chronic­ity Per­for­mance Con­sult­ing has been coach­ing finan­cial advi­sors since 1998.

Bob Simp­son, pres­i­dent and founder of Syn­chronic­ity has been involved, directly or indi­rectly in the finan­cial ser­vices indus­try since 1981. He has been a very suc­cess­ful finan­cial advi­sor with Nes­bitt Thom­son Inc., a major Cana­dian finan­cial insti­tu­tion. Between 1981 and 1989, he built a busi­ness with more than $120 mil­lion in assets under man­age­ment, was branch man­ager and SVP National Sales for Mid­land Wal­wyn and has been coach­ing finan­cial advi­sors since 1998.

You can fol­low Bob Simp­son via:


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Advisor Collaboration, Synchronicity | Comments Off


The last resort for achieving motivation

Thursday, April 1st, 2010

Dan Richards, Strategic ImperativesOver the past six months, I’ve spent lots of time talk­ing to advi­sors, both indi­vid­u­ally and in groups.

A key con­clu­sion:  Never have so many advi­sors strug­gled to main­tain even the most basic level of activ­ity and show up in the morn­ing with a mod­icum of enthusiasm.

Yes, some advi­sors are step­ping up to the chal­lenge and ramp­ing up activ­ity and com­mu­ni­ca­tion with exist­ing and prospec­tive clients — but they’re the minor­ity. More typ­i­cal are those advi­sors who strug­gle to do much more than show up at the office.  And even when in the office, some advi­sors con­fess there are days when they fight to make more than four or five calls.

As a result, in some cases, a dif­fer­ent approach is required to stay motivated.

If you find your­self among those fight­ing to stay moti­vated, you might want to con­sider a recent New York Times arti­cle on a three step approach to com­pet­i­tive diet­ing that is pay­ing results, par­tic­u­larly among guys. While this arti­cle focuses on diet­ing, the prin­ci­pals can be applied more broadly to any dif­fi­cult task.

Step One:

In the intial stage of this com­pe­ti­tion, you and one or more col­leagues each set weekly goals. For exam­ple, it could be to have three face to face client meet­ings and six phone for­mal appoint­ments to review port­fo­lios with clients each week. And you might toss at least one face to face or phone con­ver­sa­tion with a prospect into the mix for good measure.

Step Two:

Next you agree on how long the com­pe­ti­tion will last — a rea­son­able length might be any­where from six to twelve weeks — and set a time for a “weekly weigh-in”, where each week’s results are reported and recorded.

One group of Toronto invest­ment bankers who embarked on a 13 week weight loss com­pe­ti­tion last fall raised the ante by hav­ing the weekly tally posted on their firm’s intranet. (To make things fair, suc­cess was mea­sured by the per­cent of weight lost rather than absolute pounds.)

Step Three:

In the final step, you agree to the stakes.

There are lots of dif­fer­ent ways to reward the win­ners and pun­ish the losers in this kind of com­pe­ti­tion.  Each par­tic­i­pant could put $100 into a pot, with any­one fail­ing to meet their objec­tives over the com­pe­ti­tion for­feit­ing their con­tri­bu­tion; the pro­ceeds could either be shared by those achiev­ing their goal or fund a party at the end for every­one who participated.

You could have a win­ner take all struc­ture, where who­ever has the most meet­ings and makes the most calls walks away with the pro­ceeds. Alter­na­tively, you could set a weekly penalty of $20 for any­one who falls short of their goals, so that even if some­one falls behind after a cou­ple of weeks, they have an incen­tive to keep trying.

Or you could go the anti-charity” route described in the New York Times arti­cle, where losers have to write a cheque to an orga­ni­za­tion com­pletely at odds with their val­ues. (Depend­ing on your polit­i­cal point of view, for exam­ple, the losers might have to write a cheque to the Con­ser­v­a­tive Party, the Lib­er­als, the NDP or the Bloc Que­be­cois — as I write this, I can imag­ine bemused party offi­cials from the Bloc won­der­ing what’s prompted a flood of new con­tri­bu­tions from Eng­lish Canada.)

As an aside, if you don’t entirely trust other advi­sors in your office when it comes to self report­ing meet­ings and activ­ity level, you could always keep score by com­mis­sion lev­els or new accounts opened.

Remem­ber, des­per­ate times call for des­per­ate mea­sures. If every­thing you’ve tried to stay moti­vated has failed, con­sider giv­ing old fash­ioned com­pet­i­tive spirit, greed and humil­i­a­tion a try.  See if you can enlist some of your col­leagues to join you  - to para­phrase Karl Marx, by unit­ing in a friendly com­pe­ti­tion, you have noth­ing to lose but your sense of drift and lack of direction.

For those who want to read more, the full arti­cle is below:
HEALTH / FITNESS & NUTRITION | Feb­ru­ary 05, 2009
Fit­ness:  Diet­ing? Put Your Money Where Your Fat Is
By PAMELA WEILER GRAYSON
Inter­net sites that facil­i­tate diet bet­ting have seen an increase in use, and recent stud­ies have sup­ported the idea that such wagers work for many peo­ple who couldn’t seem to shed pounds any other way.


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Dan Richards | Comments Off


Breaking through the procrastination logjam

Thursday, March 18th, 2010

A cou­ple of weeks back, I got a call from an advi­sor who found him­self way behind on con­tact­ing clients, felt over­whelmed at the prospect of tack­ling this and was par­a­lyzed by pro­cras­ti­na­tion as a result.

We all suf­fer from pro­cras­ti­na­tion — the only dif­fer­ence is the mag­ni­tude of the problem.

For advi­sors look­ing to over­come pro­cras­ti­na­tion, here’s the three-step solu­tion I sug­gested to this advi­sor.Step One:

At the end of each day, iden­tify two things you’ve been pro­cras­ti­nat­ing about.

Each should be some­thing that can be addressed in fif­teen min­utes or less — a prospect or client to call, email to write or admin prob­lem to resolve.

If the issue can’t be dealt with in fif­teen min­utes, then carve out a fif­teen minute slice to at least start.

Adver­tise­ment


Step Two:

Hav­ing iden­ti­fied the two issues, write them down on top of your to-do list, in your day-timer or on a piece of paper.

Then carve out 30 min­utes in your cal­en­dar on the first free spot the next morn­ing — ide­ally the very first thing in the morn­ing. If you don’t have thirty min­utes avail­able, then you’ll need to come in early to get some other things done to free up the time to address this.

Step Three

Resist the temp­ta­tion to avoid tack­ling the two issues. Resolve to deal with them — if you haven’t tack­led them by lunch time, then  put off going for lunch until you’ve addressed them.

I got a call early this week from this advi­sor thank­ing me for my sug­ges­tion. He’d put my idea into prac­tice — while he still had clients to call, using this approach he’d begun knock­ing over­due client calls off his to-do list (and in fact had increased the num­ber of these calls to four a day). As a result, he feels much bet­ter com­ing into the office and his over­all pro­duc­tiv­ity and enthu­si­asm level is a lot higher.

Lots of us are feel­ing over­whelmed these days. If you can relate to this, con­sider using the two item a day, three step approach that worked for this advisor.


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off