Posts Tagged ‘Market Valuations’

Using credible experts to help clients stick to their plans

Wednesday, January 25th, 2012

War­ren Buf­fett has said it only takes two things for investors to suc­ceed — hav­ing a sound plan and stick­ing to it…and it’s the stick­ing to it part where most peo­ple struggle.

Along sim­i­lar lines, the key for advi­sors in help­ing clients suc­ceed is not devel­op­ing the right plan, it’s putting in place strate­gies to help clients stick to the plan once it’s developed.

That’s typ­i­cally not a big prob­lem when peo­ple are mak­ing money and investors feel rewarded for being in markets.

But it’s a huge issue in times like these, when it’s easy for Cana­di­ans to become anx­ious and discouraged…to go to cash with their exist­ing invest­ments and stop mak­ing RRSP contributions.

In light of that, here’s a strat­egy that can help clients main­tain con­fi­dence and stick to their plans.

Pro­vid­ing perspective

In my con­ver­sa­tions with Cana­dian investors, almost all want to deal with advi­sors who are gen­er­ally pos­i­tive but at the same time pro­vide a bal­anced per­spec­tive; so don’t fall into the perma-bull “don’t worry be happy” camp.

That’s why you can’t dis­miss the issues that global economies and stock mar­kets are facing.

And with many clients, you can’t rely on just your own opin­ion or your firm’s research — in times like these, it’s help­ful to pro­vide sup­port from trusted, third party sources.

The lead­ing voices in the val­u­a­tion debate

That’s the rea­son that in early July I con­ducted video inter­views with both Jeremy Siegel and Robert Shiller, the two lead­ing voices on the mar­ket val­u­a­tions, with a view to pre­sent­ing both sides of the argu­ment on mar­ket valuations.

Both Siegel and Shiller are highly cred­i­ble — they each called the tech melt­down and take a fact-based approach to their analysis.

Here’s the link to a March Wall Street Jour­nal front page story that high­lighted these two aca­d­e­mics as the lead­ing voices in the under­val­ued vs. over­val­ued debate: http://​online​.wsj​.com/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​S​B​1​0​0​0​1​4​2​4​0​5​2​7​4​8​7​0​4​7​0​6​3​0​4​5​7​5​1​0​7​4​9​2​6​3​2​5​6​7​8​0​2​.​h​tml

Using the videos with clients

Last week, videos of the inter­views with Siegel and Shiller were posted to the Cli​entin​sights​.ca website.

There are a cou­ple of ways to use these interviews.

One is to email clients the one that sup­ports your point of view.

Alter­na­tively, you might want to send clients not just the one you agree with but both videos — and then talk about the con­trary case that has been presented.

By demon­strat­ing that you’ve looked at the full gamut of views rather than telling just one side of story, your ulti­mate rec­om­men­da­tion has more power.

So if you’re rec­om­mend­ing clients stay fully invested, it’s impor­tant to show clients you’ve exam­ined the neg­a­tive case.

And if you’re cau­tious and rec­om­mend­ing cash, it’s help­ful to demon­strate that you’re not ignor­ing the opti­mistic voices.

Doing this entails a longer, more detailed con­ver­sa­tion — but it’s this kind of con­ver­sa­tion that helps clients stick to their plan at the inevitable time when the mar­ket goes against the stance you’ve taken.

To watch videos of two of the inter­views with Jeremy Siegel, click here:

Why stocks are undervalued

http://​cli​entin​sights​.ca/​v​i​d​e​o​/​j​e​r​e​m​y​-​s​i​e​g​e​l​-​w​h​y​-​s​t​o​c​k​s​-​a​r​e​-​u​n​d​e​r​v​a​l​u​e​d​/​t​y​p​e​:​i​n​v​e​s​tor

Respond­ing on mar­ket concerns:

http://​cli​entin​sights​.ca/​v​i​d​e​o​/​j​e​r​e​m​y​-​s​i​e​g​e​l​-​r​e​s​p​o​n​d​i​n​g​-​t​o​-​m​a​r​k​e​t​-​c​o​n​c​e​r​n​s​/​t​y​p​e​:​i​n​v​e​s​tor

And these inter­views sum­ma­rize Robert Shiller’s views on the market:

A cau­tious out­look for stocks:

http://​www​.cli​entin​sights​.ca/​v​i​d​e​o​/​r​o​b​e​r​t​-​s​h​i​l​l​e​r​-​a​-​c​a​u​t​i​o​u​s​-​o​u​t​l​o​o​k​-​f​o​r​-​s​t​o​c​k​s​/​t​y​p​e​:​i​n​v​e​s​tor

The impact of con­sumer confidence:

http://​www​.cli​entin​sights​.ca/​v​i​d​e​o​/​r​o​b​e​r​t​-​s​h​i​l​l​e​r​-​t​h​e​-​i​m​p​a​c​t​-​o​f​-​c​o​n​s​u​m​e​r​-​c​o​n​f​i​d​e​n​c​e​/​t​y​p​e​:​i​n​v​e​s​tor

To watch a dozen dif­fer­ent inter­views with Jeremy Siegel and Robert Shiller, go to www​.cli​entin​sights​.ca.


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Dan Richards | Comments Off


The pendulum never stops……”

Sunday, September 19th, 2010

Dan Richard, Strategic ImperativesOcca­sion­ally, some­thing we hear sticks in our minds and stays with us.

When I was in busi­ness school in the 1970s, my finance prof used a phrase that I often find use­ful in con­ver­sa­tion with clients and investors — espe­cially in mar­kets such as we’re in today.

That phrase: “The pen­du­lum never stops in the middle.”

My finance pro­fes­sor was one of the big names in the field — he con­sulted with many of the Wall Street firms and was fre­quently quoted in the press.

He used this phrase in the con­text of mar­ket val­u­a­tions and mar­ket sen­ti­ment. He talked about the his­tor­i­cal real­ity that mar­kets inevitably swing from one extreme to another, from peri­ods of out­landishly ele­vated val­u­a­tions to ridicu­lously beaten down lev­els, from peri­ods of unques­tion­ing eupho­ria to absolute pessimism.

The pen­du­lum never stops in the mid­dle” applies in lots of other cases as well.

Look at the market’s and media’s atti­tude to risk and lever­age — a year ago com­pa­nies that used insuf­fi­cient  lever­age to boost prof­its were pun­ished for being “dull and bor­ing”, today even pru­dent risk has become a dirty word. (The most pop­u­lar arti­cle in the online New York Times last week was a piece lay­ing out Cana­dian banks as the model for the global bank­ing sys­tem — a notion that six months ago would have been com­pletely absurd.)

Con­sider investors’ atti­tudes to own­ing resource stocks — where not long ago load­ing up on these was all that many investors wanted to talk about, today they don’t even want to hear about own­ing resources.

This is also reflected in expec­ta­tions on oil prices. A year ago, the “peak oil” the­ory held sway and demand from China and India was going to push oil to $200 by year end. Today we’ve begun to hear about the “peak demand the­ory”, the view that demand for oil peaked last year and we’ll never, ever see demand at that level again.

Recall all the invest­ment fads and “flavour of the day” investments.

And think about the wild swing in con­sumer sen­ti­ment on appro­pri­ate spend­ing that’s taken place in the last lit­tle while– from the norm of lav­ish expen­di­ture to “the new frugality.”

The key point that my finance prof made was that while the stock mar­ket may be effi­cient and ratio­nal in the mid and long term, in the near term the “swing­ing of the pen­du­lum” cre­ates ter­rific oppor­tu­ni­ties for com­pa­nies and for investors who can main­tain their perspective.

That was true thirty years ago … and it’s arguably even truer today

So when talk­ing to investors who are spooked by recent events and dire eco­nomic fore­casts, con­sider talk­ing about the fact that “the pen­du­lum never stops in the middle”.

We may not be all the way to the extreme of despair and pes­simism, but we are almost cer­tainly well past the mid point — and into the area that we’ll look back on years from now and rec­og­nize that the dras­tic shift in sen­ti­ment has cre­ated sig­nif­i­cant value for those bold enough to look past the swing­ing of the pen­du­lum and rec­og­nize it.


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Dan Richards | 1 Comment »


Helping Clients Stick to Their Plans

Wednesday, July 28th, 2010

War­ren Buf­fett has said it only takes two things for investors to suc­ceed — hav­ing a sound plan and stick­ing to it … and it’s the stick­ing to it part where most peo­ple struggle.

Along sim­i­lar lines, the key for advi­sors in help­ing clients suc­ceed is not devel­op­ing the right plan, it’s putting in place strate­gies to help clients stick to the plan once it’s developed.

That’s less of an issue when  peo­ple are mak­ing money and investors feel rewarded for being in markets.

But it’s a huge issue in times like these, when it’s easy for Cana­di­ans to become anx­ious and dis­cour­aged … to go to cash with their exist­ing invest­ments and stop mak­ing RRSP contributions.

Here are two tac­tics that might help clients main­tain con­fi­dence and stick to their plans:

Pro­vid­ing perspective

In my con­ver­sa­tions with Cana­dian investors, almost all want to deal with advi­sors who are at the same time gen­er­ally pos­i­tive but also pro­vide a bal­anced per­spec­tive, so don’t fall into the perma-bull  “don’t worry be happy” camp.

That’s why you can’t dis­miss the issues that global economies and stock mar­kets are facing.

And with many clients, you can’t rely on just your own opin­ion or your firm’s research — in times like these, it’s help­ful to pro­vide sup­port from trusted, third party sources.

You also have to be care­ful about only telling one side of the story — in fact by demon­strat­ing that you’ve looked at the full gamut of views, your ulti­mate rec­om­men­da­tion has more power.

So if you’re rec­om­mend­ing clients stay fully invested, it’s impor­tant to show clients you’ve exam­ined the neg­a­tive case.

And if you’re cau­tious and rec­om­mend­ing cash, it’s help­ful to demon­strate that you’re not ignor­ing the opti­mistic voices.

That’s the rea­son that in early July I spoke to both Jeremy Siegel and Robert Shiller, the two lead­ing voices on the mar­ket val­u­a­tions, so that I could present both sides of the argu­ment on mar­ket val­u­a­tions — and so that advi­sors could present both sides to clients.

Both  Siegel and Shiller are highly cred­i­ble — they both called the tech melt­down and take a fact-based approach to their analysis.

And if you’re going to use one of these inter­views with clients to sup­port your case, you might want to send clients not just the one you agree with but both videos — and then talk about the con­trary case that has been presented.

Doing this entails a longer, more detailed con­ver­sa­tion — but it’s this kind of con­ver­sa­tion that helps clients stick to their plan when the mar­ket goes against whichever stance you’ve taken.


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Dan Richards | Comments Off


The Best Books on Investing

Wednesday, July 14th, 2010

The arti­cle below by U.S. fund man­ager by Vitaliy Kat­senel­son first appeared on U.S. advi­sor site Advi­sor Perspectives.

It’s a reminder of the con­stant need to be alert for the oppor­tu­nity to learn more.about invest­ing — and to be open to how much we don’t know on this topic.

In crazy times like today, all one could and actu­ally should ask for is san­ity. Yes, san­ity — a clear mind free of noise to deal with the insan­ity that is thrust upon us by a volatile and noise-making machine also known as the stock market.

We find our­selves glued to the com­puter screens or CNBC wait­ing to find out what the Dow’s next tick is going to be. Unfor­tu­nately, we are left with only a headache and wasted time. What’s next? Here is my advice: read. Read books that will bring you san­ity, the ones that will snap you back into the dis­ci­pline of an investor and out of the sorry shell of a ner­vous observer of the daily stock mar­ket melo­drama. The fol­low­ing books are excel­lent choices and come with plenty of san­ity and sage advice.

I orig­i­nally wrote this list of rec­om­mended books last year; recently, I updated it and added a few more books. I hope to keep adding to it every year. It con­tains six sec­tions: Sell­ing, Think Like an Investor, Behav­ioral Invest­ing, Eco­nom­ics, Stock Mar­ket His­tory, and Books for the Soul. I hope you enjoy it.

Sell­ing

I’ll start with Its When You Sell That Counts, 3rd edi­tion, by Don­ald Cas­sidy. Sell­ing is usu­ally as pop­u­lar as candy the day after Hal­loween. Dur­ing sec­u­lar bull mar­kets sell­ing is frowned upon as buy-and-hold turns into invest­ing reli­gion. And since sell­ing vio­lates the “hold” covenant of that reli­gion, the investor who buys and sells is labeled a non­be­liever, or even worse, a trader (if you say “trader” fast enough it sounds like “traitor”).

In sec­u­lar bull mar­kets, on aver­age, sell deci­sions are not as reward­ing as hold deci­sions, as mar­ket val­u­a­tions are expand­ing and even second-rate dogs (stocks) start look­ing like pedi­greed cocker spaniels. Every investor is now a “long-term” investor and sell becomes a four-letter word. But being a long-term investor is not about the longevity of your hold deci­sions, but rather it is an atti­tude. Hold­ing a stock because you bought it is a fal­lacy; you should only hold a stock if future risk-adjusted return war­rants it.

War­ren Buf­fett has been mis­tak­enly pro­moted (though, I’d argue, demoted) into deity sta­tus in this buy-and-hold tem­ple. Let’s cor­rect this mis­take. War­ren Buf­fett became a buy-and-hold investor when his port­fo­lio and posi­tions got big enough, push­ing $60 bil­lion, so that sell­ing became a dif­fi­cult under­tak­ing. In his early career, before “Ora­cle of Omaha” was his moniker, he was a buy-and-sell investor. As he joined the boards of some of his biggest hold­ings (like Coke and Wash­ing­ton Post), it made sell­ing even more difficult.

One doesn’t need the ben­e­fit of hind­sight to know that at 55 times earn­ings Coke was tremen­dously over­val­ued in 1999. Coke, like the major­ity of Buffett’s top pub­lic hold­ings (Wash­ing­ton Post, Proc­ter & Gam­ble, John­son & John­son, and many oth­ers), did not go any­where for a decade. I dare you to take a look at his top pub­lic hold­ings and tell me whether he would have done a lot bet­ter if he had sold them when they became fully val­ued (or slightly over­val­ued). In most cases, that would have been a decade ago.

Adver­tise­ment


Emo­tions assault us from dif­fer­ent direc­tions when we face a sell deci­sion: If it is a los­ing invest­ment, we want to wait to break even. This is the wrong atti­tude. Our pur­chase price and sell deci­sion should not be related (the only excep­tion begin tax sell­ing). Or when it comes to sell­ing a win­ner, we want to sell only at the top. Again this is the wrong atti­tude: the top is only appar­ent in hind­sight, when it is usu­ally too late.

We should sell the stock when it reaches our price or val­u­a­tion tar­get, deter­mined at the time of pur­chase. We (our emo­tions and false goals, to be exact) are our biggest enemy when it comes to invest­ing, and espe­cially sell­ing. Cassidy’s won­der­ful book has been writ­ten to fix this. Its objec­tive is to recal­i­brate your mind and free you from the impris­on­ment of past deci­sions, to break you free from the buy-and-hold state of mind and turn you into a buy-and-sell investor.

OK, this is a bit of a long intro­duc­tion to this book, but it’s a ter­rific and a very impor­tant work. A proper sell dis­ci­pline will decide between great or mediocre returns for even the best-crafted buy deci­sions. Pros may want to skip a few chap­ters, but it is an impor­tant read for every­one, espe­cially in today’s environment.

Think and behave like an investor

The fol­low­ing books should help you to think like an investor, forc­ing you to think beyond stock tick­ers and focus on what is under the hood: the busi­nesses and the peo­ple who run them. The first one is The Essays of War­ren Buf­fett. It’s a com­pi­la­tion of War­ren Buffett’s let­ters to share­hold­ers from annual reports dat­ing back to the 1970s. Before this book came out (or at least before I was aware of its exis­tence) I had my grad­u­ate stu­dents at Uni­ver­sity of Col­orado read Buffett’s annual reports, which as you may expect were very rep­e­ti­tious. His wis­dom doesn’t vary that much from year to year. This book orga­nizes the main con­cepts and removes annoy­ing redundancy.

Another good book is The Entre­pre­neur­ial Investor: The Art, Sci­ence, and Busi­ness of Value Invest­ing, writ­ten by my friends at West Coast Asset Man­age­ment. It accom­plishes many objec­tives of Buffett’s essays, plus has plenty of cul­tural ref­er­ences, humor, and com­mon sense. All of these things make it a fun and enjoy­able read. I made this book sug­gested read­ing in my grad­u­ate invest­ment class

The Super Ana­lysts by Andrew Leem­ing is a book I think few peo­ple have heard of. The author inter­views suc­cess­ful investors (not aca­d­e­mics), and they dis­cuss their approach to invest­ing and analy­sis of com­mon stocks and some spe­cific industries

You Can Be a Stock Mar­ket Genius: Uncover the Secret Hid­ing Places of Stock Mar­ket Prof­its by Joel Green­blatt is one of those books that should be read more than once. Joel shares very unique approaches about how to find under­val­ued stocks. On top of being a very good investor, he has a healthy sense of humor. Joel also has writ­ten The Lit­tle Book That Beats the Mar­ket (Lit­tle Books. Big Prof­its). I plan to read this book with my son when he gets older, as it is a great intro­duc­tion to invest­ing. At the end of the book Joel offers a “magic for­mula,” a screen that has beaten the mar­ket over a long period of time

The magic screen is very sim­ple: buy low price-to-earnings stocks that have a high return-on-capital. Low P/E is an indi­ca­tion of cheap­ness, while high return-on-capital is an indi­ca­tion of com­pet­i­tive advan­tage (at least in the past) and the pos­si­bil­ity to grow earn­ings at high rates. Here is the book’s Web site, which pro­vides a weekly list of stocks that score high on both measures.

The Busi­ness of Value Invest­ing: Six Essen­tial Ele­ments to Buy­ing Com­pa­nies Like War­ren Buf­fett by Sham Gad. Wiley sent me the man­u­script to review, and it hap­pened to arrive on my birth­day in June. I opened the man­u­script when guests showed up at the door; I set it on the kitchen table. My niece, a recent grad­u­ate from busi­ness school, who had lit­tle inter­est in invest­ing, picked it up, and I did not see her for the whole evening. She loved it! It is hard to make value invest­ing inter­est­ing, but Sham did. I’ve read it too, and thought it was an excel­lent intro­duc­tory book to value investing.

Pil­grim­age to War­ren Buffett’s Omaha: A Hedge Fund Manager’s Dis­patches from Inside the Berk­shire Hath­away Annual Meet­ing by Jeff Matthews. This is not another biog­ra­phy of War­ren Buf­fett, but rather the most insight­ful and crit­i­cal (fair and bal­anced) analy­sis of Buf­fett and Berk­shire I’ve ever read. I also encour­age you to read Jeff’s mus­ings on his blog; I’ve been read­ing it for years.

The Lit­tle Book That Builds Wealth: The Knock­out For­mula for Find­ing Great Invest­ments (Lit­tle Books. Big Prof­its) by Pat Dorsey. Michael Porter wrote Com­pet­i­tive Strat­egy: Tech­niques for Ana­lyz­ing Indus­tries and Com­peti­tors a few decades ago; quite deserv­ingly it turned into a bible of indus­try analy­sis at all busi­ness schools and taught in all man­age­ment pro­grams. Pat Dorsey took Michael Porter’s con­cepts and in this very lit­tle book applied them directly to invest­ing. To be hon­est, if this book had been out when I was teach­ing my invest­ment class, I’d be using it instead of Michael Porter’s (sorry Michael), as it is writ­ten for investors.

More Mort­gage Melt­down: 6 Ways to Profit in These Bad Times. This book was writ­ten by Whit­ney Tilson and Glen Tongue, who are excel­lent investors. I’ve seen their pre­sen­ta­tion that is the core of this book sev­eral times; in fact you can down­load the lat­est ver­sion here. Invest­ment ideas of how to profit from today’s cri­sis have already played out for the most part; so this book will not give you fish, but under­stand­ing their ana­lyt­i­cal process will teach you how to fish.

Behav­ioral Investing

The right tem­pera­ment is cru­cial in invest­ing. Being a crit­i­cal thinker and know­ing how to value stocks is impor­tant, but it is all a waste if your emo­tions get the bet­ter of you. The fol­low­ing books will help you to rec­og­nize the short­com­ings of your hard-wiring and help you to devise strate­gies to deal with it.

Psy­chol­ogy of Invest­ing (3rd Edi­tion), by John R. Nof­singer, is short and to the point. You’ll become an expert on behav­ioral invest­ing in about an hour. Well, not quite, but close.

Why Smart Peo­ple Make Big Money Mis­takes And How To Cor­rect Them: Lessons From The New Sci­ence Of Behav­ioral Eco­nom­ics, by Gary Bel­sky and Thomas Gilovich. This is a fun and easy read. It also addresses how short­com­ings in our wiring impact money deci­sions, like buy­ing cars and stereos.

Your Money and Your Brain: How the New Sci­ence of Neu­roe­co­nom­ics Can Help Make You Rich, by Jason Zweig, is another selec­tion. I have to admit that the two books above cover many top­ics in this book (though this one offers new angles and insights) and are likely to be more excit­ing reads, but Chap­ter 10 is what makes this book a must-read: it addresses hap­pi­ness — yes, hap­pi­ness. Although, as most of us know, money doesn’t buy hap­pi­ness (unless you are starv­ing or liv­ing on the street), money spent on acqui­si­tions — things — brings a burst of hap­pi­ness that quickly fades away. Think of your level of hap­pi­ness when you bought the car of your dreams. Money spent on expe­ri­ences — being — brings a higher util­ity of hap­pi­ness. Rec­ol­lect­ing expe­ri­ence brings hap­pi­ness. I plan to reread this chap­ter at least a cou­ple of times a year. Zweig also pro­vides a list of things you can do that will make you happy, and none of them require you to spend a penny, which is a big pos­i­tive in today’s economy.

Rem­i­nis­cences of a Stock Oper­a­tor (Wiley Invest­ment Clas­sics), writ­ten in 1923 by Edwin Lefevre, gives a first-person per­spec­tive of the fic­tion­al­ized tale of the early years of the great trader Jesse Liv­er­more. It is rumored that this book was actu­ally writ­ten by Jesse Liv­er­more and edited by Lefevre.

Though traders and value investors fish in the same pond — the stock mar­ket — and they may even catch the same fish at times, their approaches and ana­lyt­i­cal time­frames are dia­met­ri­cally dif­fer­ent. How­ever, they do share a com­mon ele­ment: both are done by humans and thus are impacted by emo­tions. This book pro­vides a great intro­spec­tive look inside a trader’s mind and teaches many behav­ioral and common-sense lessons. Here are some quotes:

Another les­son I learned early is that there is noth­ing new in Wall Street. There can’t be because spec­u­la­tion is as old as the hills. What­ever hap­pens in the stock mar­ket to-day has hap­pened before and will hap­pen again.

and

A man must believe in him­self and his judg­ment if he expects to make a liv­ing at this game. That is why I don’t believe in tips. If I buy stocks on Smith’s tip I must sell those same stocks on Smith’s tip.

and

The recog­ni­tion of our own mis­takes should not ben­e­fit us any more than the study of our suc­cesses. But there is a nat­ural ten­dency in all men to avoid pun­ish­ment. When you asso­ciate cer­tain mis­takes with a lick­ing, you do not han­ker for a sec­ond dose, and, of course, all stock-market mis­takes wound you in two ten­der spots-your pock­et­book and your vanity.

and

One of the most help­ful things that any­body can learn is to give up try­ing to catch the last eighth or the first. These two are the most expen­sive eighths in the world. They have cost stock traders, in the aggre­gate, enough mil­lions of dol­lars to build a con­crete high­way across the continent.

Another good book about Liv­er­more is called Jesse Liv­er­more: World’s Great­est Stock Trader, by Richard Smit­ten. I quoted this book in my book — here is the quote:

After sev­eral months of despair, Liv­er­more finally sum­moned up the courage to ana­lyze his behav­ior and to iso­late what he’d done wrong. He finally had to con­front the human side of his per­son­al­ity, his emo­tions and his feel­ings.… Why had he thrown all his mar­ket prin­ci­ples, his trad­ing the­o­ries, his hard-earned laws to the wind? His wild behav­ior had crashed him finan­cially and spir­i­tu­ally. Why had he done it? He finally real­ized it was his van­ity, his ego.… The out­stand­ing suc­cess of mak­ing more than $1 mil­lion in one day had shaken him to his foun­da­tions. It was not that he could not deal with failure-he had been deal­ing with fail­ure all his life-what he could not deal with was success.

Eco­nom­ics

Politi­cians, God rest their souls, always try to appeal to the low­est com­mon denom­i­na­tor. They try to “pro­tect” us from evil doers by insist­ing on minimum-wage laws or rent con­trols, or threat­en­ing wind­fall taxes on oil com­pa­nies. They sound like heroes fight­ing for the lit­tle guy against the evil doers. How­ever, all they are doing is feed­ing on the eco­nomic illit­er­acy of the Aver­age Joe. This is why the fol­low­ing two books should be required read­ing in high schools and col­leges: Basic Eco­nom­ics 3rd Ed: A Com­mon Sense Guide to the Econ­omy by Thomas Sow­ell and A World of Wealth: How Cap­i­tal­ism Turns Prof­its into Progress by Thomas G. Donlan.

You may think Alan Greenspan had a hand in today’s cri­sis. I know I do. He took inter­est rates down to incred­i­bly low lev­els and kept them there for too long, caus­ing the real estate bub­ble. He also did not think Wall Street needed reg­u­la­tion. But that doesn’t make his book, The Age of Tur­bu­lence, any less of an excel­lent read. It is not writ­ten in Fed-speak. It seems that Sir Alan, after he left the Fed, learned how to use Eng­lish in a very clear and engag­ing way. This is not just another auto­bi­og­ra­phy, either. The book goes far beyond that. It cov­ers the work­ings of the Fed, lessons on macro­eco­nom­ics and his­tory, and per­spec­tive on Amer­i­can pol­i­tics from an insider who served under or worked with the last eight presidents.

Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand. This is a novel, not an eco­nom­ics book; how­ever, it accom­plishes a lot more than most eco­nom­ics books could ever accom­plish. It vividly illus­trates what hap­pens to the econ­omy when the invis­i­ble hand of cap­i­tal­ism is replaced by the “fair” and “com­pas­sion­ate” hand of social­ism: the econ­omy collapses.

Ayn Rand immi­grated to the US from Rus­sia in 1927 when she was 22, when her father’s busi­ness was seized by the Russ­ian gov­ern­ment, osten­si­bly for the greater good. I left Rus­sia 64 years later, a decade after Rand died, and my fam­ily suf­fered a lot less than hers. How­ever, we (as well as mil­lions of Rus­sians) both saw the ugly con­se­quences of socialism.

In Atlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand defines her phi­los­o­phy: indi­vid­u­al­ism. Indi­vid­u­al­ism is not a polit­i­cally cor­rect term today (if ever) in our soci­ety. One doesn’t make a lot of friends by adver­tis­ing his self­ish­ness and greed. So call it anti-collectivism, where inde­pen­dence, self-reliance, and indi­vid­ual pur­suit of hap­pi­ness are supe­rior goals, as opposed to col­lec­tivism, where pur­suit of com­mu­nal and national goals is often under­taken at the expense of indi­vid­ual liberty.

Accord­ing to Jen­nifer Burns, who recently pub­lished Ayn Rand’s biog­ra­phy, Rand’s pop­u­lar­ity surges dur­ing every polit­i­cal cycle, when the mer­its of our polit­i­cal sys­tem are being debated. Win­ston Churchill said it well: “Cap­i­tal­ism is the worst of all pos­si­ble eco­nomic sys­tems, with the excep­tion of all the oth­ers.” I hope we only see the alter­na­tive sys­tem to cap­i­tal­ism — a com­pas­sion­ate social­ism that is often offered to us as an alter­na­tive to our dis­pas­sion­ate sys­tem — only on the pages of Atlas Shrugged.

Stock Mar­ket History

I’ve really enjoyed read­ing Stocks for the Long Run by Jeremy Siegel, but it took me a while to rec­og­nize how dan­ger­ous this book is.

It is well-written and pro­vides a very good overview of the per­for­mance of dif­fer­ent asset classes over last two cen­turies. But the book needs a dif­fer­ent title, maybe some­thing like “Stocks for the Really, Really… Really Long Run.” This way, it would not lure investors into a false sense of secu­rity when it comes to stocks. Prob­a­bly unin­ten­tion­ally, it preaches that stocks (and the stock mar­ket as a whole) are always a buy, no mat­ter what val­u­a­tions are, as they do bet­ter than other asset classes in the long run; and that a 7% real rate of return is a birthright for stock investors, no mat­ter if the stock mar­ket is extremely cheap or ridicu­lously expen­sive. This is very true if your time hori­zon is 30 years or you plan to live for­ever. It is also true if you can tol­er­ate see­ing your port­fo­lio go nowhere for a decade or longer. Unfor­tu­nately, most of us don’t have this long a time hori­zon. We need to send kids to school, pay for wed­dings, boats, etc. I don’t know any­one who has the patience to see their port­fo­lio of stocks do noth­ing for decades.

That is why Siegel’s book should only be read with the fol­low­ing anti­dote: Stocks for the Long Run, 4th Edi­tion: The Defin­i­tive Guide to Finan­cial Mar­ket Returns & Long Term Invest­ment Strate­gies, and Unex­pected Returns: Under­stand­ing Sec­u­lar Stock Mar­ket Cycles which is a truly ter­rific book by Ed East­er­ling. Unlike Siegel, East­er­ling shows that despite stocks being a great invest­ment for the (really, really) long run, they have peri­ods when their returns are unspec­tac­u­lar. Ed calls these peri­ods bear mar­kets. I call them range-bound mar­kets, which is just a dif­fer­ence in seman­tics. Those bear (range-bound) mar­kets take place after sec­u­lar bull markets.

What is the appro­pri­ate way to look at risk?

The fol­low­ing two books, Fooled by Ran­dom­ness: The Hid­den Role of Chance in Life and in the Mar­kets and The Black Swan, are by Nas­sim Taleb. These books address risk and rare events (the Black Swans)

Fooled by Ran­dom­ness is my favorite non­fic­tion book, period. I’ve read it at least five times. This book turns the way we are taught to look at risk upside down. Nas­sim rebels against the cur­rent estab­lish­ment of finance that mea­sures risk with ele­gant for­mu­las that receive Nobel Prizes but lack com­mon sense.

Any model that solely focuses on past obser­va­tions and dis­misses out­comes that lie out­side of what hap­pened in the past is worth­less and, more impor­tantly, dan­ger­ous. One way of under­stand­ing how ran­dom­ness works is by study­ing alter­na­tive his­tor­i­cal paths. This means more than just focus­ing on what took place in the past — the def­i­nite (since it already hap­pened), observed his­tory, but one that before­hand was actu­ally still just one of many pos­si­ble ran­dom out­comes. One should focus on what could have taken place, what alter­na­tive paths might have existed. This allows us to think cre­atively about what could have hap­pened, and with that added insight to then pre­dict and pre­pare for what might hap­pen in the future.

Let’s take the cur­rent cri­sis: Wall Street and rat­ing agen­cies dis­missed the pos­si­bil­ity that hous­ing prices might decline nation­wide. This hadn’t hap­pened since World War II — well, then, it wouldn’t hap­pen in the future. There­fore, Wall Street took sub­prime (risky) mort­gages orig­i­nated in dif­fer­ent parts of the coun­try, lumped them together in mortgaged-backed secu­ri­ties, and — voila! — the risk had been diver­si­fied away. Junk was turned to gold. Since rat­ing agen­cies used the same under­ly­ing assump­tion — hous­ing never declines nation­wide — they announced to the world that the junk was AAA and should be bought in truck­loads — and it was. We know how this story ended.

The Black Swan is a follow-up to Fooled by Ran­dom­ness. Nas­sim takes a lot of the con­cepts dis­cussed in Fooled by Ran­dom­ness and explains them in greater detail, pro­vid­ing new and unex­pected insights. I have to warn you that The Black Swan is not easy. This book has more insights per page than most, but is not a beach read.

In this lec­ture Nas­sim cov­ers major con­cepts described in both books in great detail.

Books for the Soul

What would you do and what would you share with oth­ers if you only had months to live? This is the theme of the fol­low­ing two books: Tues­days with Mor­rie: An Old Man, a Young Man, and Life’s Great­est Les­son by Mitch Albom and The Last Lec­ture by Randy Pausch and Jef­frey Zaslow. In both books ter­mi­nally ill teach­ers share their life lessons with read­ers. Also, Randy Pausch, who sadly passed away last year, gave this great lec­ture on time man­age­ment; and here is his last lec­ture.

Another book I’ll add to this cat­e­gory is The Snow­ball: War­ren Buf­fett and the Busi­ness of Life, by Alice Schroeder. This is an autho­rized biog­ra­phy of War­ren Buf­fett. I am not sure this is the best book to read if you want to learn to invest like Mr. Buf­fett, but it gives a very dif­fer­ent and inter­est­ing view of his life. There are many great lessons we can learn from Mr. Buf­fett that go far beyond invest­ing, such as about hon­esty and trea­sur­ing one’s rep­u­ta­tion. But I thought this book was impor­tant for a very dif­fer­ent rea­son, in that it shows that War­ren Buf­fett is not a per­fect human being and that we can learn from the mae­stro, but in a dif­fer­ent way: by not repeat­ing his mis­takes. He achieved his unpar­al­leled suc­cess in his busi­ness life at the expense of his per­sonal life, unfortunately.

Espe­cially in today’s envi­ron­ment I find myself want­ing to work 24/7 (and I prob­a­bly do). This is truly a stock picker’s mar­ket. I bring my lap­top home, read The Wall Street Jour­nal at the din­ner table, and my work life starts push­ing out my per­sonal life. This book made me real­ize that no pro­fes­sional suc­cess is worth regret­ting 20 years down the road that you didn’t spend enough time with your kids. Unfor­tu­nately, Buf­fett has that regret.

To reg­is­ter for free weekly emails like this one, go to www​.advi​sor​per​spec​tives​.com.

Vitaliy N. Kat­senel­son, CFA, is a port­fo­lio manager/director of research at Active Value Invest­ing: Mak­ing Money in Range-Bound Mar­kets (Wiley Finance) (Wiley 2007). To receive Vitaliy’s future arti­cles my email, click here.



    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Dan Richards | Comments Off