Posts Tagged ‘Basis Points’

The trailer fee compensation model is making inroads—And why that might be a bad thing.

Wednesday, June 15th, 2011

By Marc Lam­on­tagne, CFP, R.F.P., FMA

Over the years there have been numer­ous debates about whether trail­ers should be con­sid­ered a fee or a com­mis­sion. Adding to the con­fu­sion are indus­try stal­warts (includ­ing yours truly) who have argued con­vinc­ingly on both sides, but new research sug­gests we may be wast­ing our col­lec­tive breath.

The results of the 2010 Advi­sor Sur­vey Report by To Fee or Not To Fee (TFONTF) and co-sponsored by the CIFPs indi­cate that the trailer fee com­pen­sa­tion model may be gain­ing trac­tion in Canada.

Think­ing of your gross earn­ings over the last 12 months, which one of the
fol­low­ing meth­ods rep­re­sented the largest per­cent­age of your earn­ings?


This ques­tion was designed to reveal which method of com­pen­sa­tion is the largest seg­ment of an advisor’s com­pen­sa­tion in a par­tic­u­lar com­pen­sa­tion model (fee or com­mis­sion). Invest­ment com­mis­sions, trail­ers, and insur­ance com­mis­sions dom­i­nate the com­pen­sa­tion of commission-based advi­sors.

On the other hand, basis-points and, inter­est­ingly, trail­ers dom­i­nate the com­pen­sa­tion of fee-based advi­sors. There is also a smaller group of fee-based advi­sors who rely on hourly fees as their main com­pen­sa­tion sta­ple.

Per­haps the trail­ers showed up sec­ond for both groups because of the par­tic­i­pants’ inter­pre­ta­tion of whether trail­ers are a fee or a com­mis­sion. Maybe they are nei­ther, but sim­ply a third form of com­pen­sa­tion favored by both groups.

Nev­er­the­less, trail­ing com­mis­sions (trail­ers), AKA ser­vice fees, dom­i­nate the com­pen­sa­tion of a large seg­ment of both com­mis­sion and fee advi­sors. For this rea­son TFONTF would like to declare trail­ers as a third, and dis­tinct, form of com­pen­sa­tion in addi­tion to fees and com­mis­sions. This new view of trail­ers will change the focus of future advi­sor sur­veys.

Though MFDA advi­sors in both camps favor trail­ers, it sim­ply can­not be explained away as a solely MFDA model (per­haps due to the lack of access to an in-house fee-based account) because there is also a high rate of usage by IIROC-licenced advisors.


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in My Practice | Comments Off


Articles You Can Send Clients (October 28, 2009)

Thursday, December 3rd, 2009

This weeks selec­tion is a the­matic group of arti­cles which focus on the Canada/Emerging Mar­kets theme.

The first three arti­cles are focused on a dis­cus­sion of strong Cana­dian fun­da­men­tals, and led by pro-Canada, pro-commodities argu­ments from David Rosen­berg, Chief Mar­kets Econ­o­mist, Gluskin Sheff. The sub­se­quent three arti­cles pro­vide strong indi­ca­tions of demand from emerg­ing mar­kets, par­tic­u­larly China, whose sav­ings are unequalled any­where in the world, where more cars are now sold than in the US, and an out­look from Merrill’s Fran­cisco Blanch that oil could reach $100 in the next year.

Mak­ing a case for Canada and com­modi­ties

This is where Cana­dian strength rel­a­tive to the United States comes into play — nearly 45 per cent of the TSX com­pos­ite index is in resources; almost triple the share in the United States. Almost 60 per cent of Canada’s exports are linked to the com­mod­ity sec­tor, roughly dou­ble the U.S. exposure.

This explains how it is that the Cana­dian equity mar­ket has man­aged to out­per­form the S&P 500 this year by a cool 2,000 basis points (in this sense, Canada is basi­cally a low-beta way to play the emerg­ing mar­kets via com­mod­ity exposure).

More­over, con­sid­er­ing that the Cana­dian dol­lar enjoys a 65-per-cent cor­re­la­tion with the CRB index, the added boost from the appre­ci­a­tion in the loonie means that an Amer­i­can investor putting money in Canada would have gar­nered a 28-per-cent gain on a currency-adjusted basis (ver­sus a 4.0-per-cent gain from the S&P 500).

Source:  http://​www​.the​globe​and​mail​.com/​g​l​o​b​e​-​i​n​v​e​s​t​o​r​/​i​n​v​e​s​t​m​e​n​t​-​i​d​e​a​s​/​f​e​a​t​u​r​e​s​/​e​x​p​e​r​t​s​-​p​o​d​i​u​m​/​m​a​k​i​n​g​-​a​-​c​a​s​e​-​f​o​r​-​c​a​n​a​d​a​-​a​n​d​-​c​o​m​m​o​d​i​t​i​e​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​1​3​0​7​6​53/

If a coun­try is too good to be true … then diversify

The Cana­dian stock mar­ket has been the star of the show over the past decade. With the help of a strong cur­rency, the S&P/TSX com­pos­ite index has beat the S&P 500 in eight of the past 10 years (in Cana­dian dol­lar terms), and nine out of 11 when 2009 is included. And there are per­sua­sive argu­ments why this will continue.

A report by Sco­tia Cap­i­tal enti­tled “Why you want to own Canada” nicely sum­ma­rizes them. It points out that Canada’s main attrib­utes are: 1) emerging-market expo­sure with lower volatil­ity; 2) cheaper val­u­a­tions rel­a­tive to the MSCI World Index; 3) stronger domes­tic fun­da­men­tals; 4) Cana­dian dol­lar strength rel­a­tive to the U.S. dol­lar and British pound; 5) prox­im­ity to the U.S. econ­omy; and 6) above-average mar­ket cap­i­tal­iza­tion com­pa­nies in finan­cials, mate­ri­als, tech­nol­ogy and industrials.

In a recent Globe col­umn, David Rosen­berg referred to Canada as a “low beta [less volatile] way to play the emerg­ing mar­kets via com­mod­ity expo­sure.” He went so far as to say, “this period when the Cana­dian mar­ket out­per­forms its south­ern peers is barely halfway done.”

Source:  http://​v1​.the​globe​and​mail​.com/​s​e​r​v​l​e​t​/​s​t​o​r​y​/​L​A​C​.​2​0​0​9​1​0​1​7​.​R​B​U​Y​S​I​D​E​1​7​A​R​T​1​8​2​5​/​T​P​S​t​o​r​y​/​T​P​B​u​s​i​n​e​ss/

Adver­tise­ment


Don’t loathe the lofty loonie

If there is one thing that Cana­di­ans are never happy with (in addi­tion to their local hockey team) it is the Cana­dian dol­lar. When it was flirt­ing near that record low of 62 cents nearly a decade ago, every­one lamented the future of the loonie. It was too expen­sive to buy any­thing that was imported, it was too costly to make that annual trip to Florida, and tick­ets on Broad­way were pro­hib­i­tively expen­sive. We felt poorer. We must have been doing some­thing wrong.

Source:  http://​v1​.the​globe​and​mail​.com/​s​e​r​v​l​e​t​/​s​t​o​r​y​/​R​T​G​A​M​.​2​0​0​9​1​0​2​5​.​w​r​o​s​e​n​b​e​r​g​1​0​2​6​/​B​N​S​t​o​r​y​/​B​u​s​i​n​ess

Finan­cial stay­ing power gives China an edge

If Amer­i­cans have been the world’s great­est con­sumers, the Chi­nese have been its great­est savers

It is tes­ti­mony to the resilience and resource­ful­ness of the Chi­nese peo­ple that, so soon after these ter­ri­ble times, their coun­try is posi­tioned to lay claim to the para­mount role in a new world order of the 21st cen­tury. Only 15 years ago, China’s man­u­fac­tur­ing out­put was only one-fifth that of the United States. Now, it is about two-thirds and ris­ing; IMF data show a dra­matic rise of annual per capita income to $3,180 (U.S.) in 2008 from only $350 in 1990, lift­ing more than one-third of a bil­lion peo­ple into China’s stan­dard of mid­dle class.

Source:  http://​www​.the​globe​and​mail​.com/​r​e​p​o​r​t​-​o​n​-​b​u​s​i​n​e​s​s​/​c​o​m​m​e​n​t​a​r​y​/​f​i​n​a​n​c​i​a​l​-​s​t​a​y​i​n​g​-​p​o​w​e​r​-​g​i​v​e​s​-​c​h​i​n​a​-​a​n​-​e​d​g​e​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​1​3​2​0​3​91/

Motor­ing ahead: More cars are now sold in China than in America

CHINA’S car mar­ket has over­taken America’s in sales vol­ume for the first time, sev­eral years ear­lier than ana­lysts had pre­dicted before the finan­cial cri­sis. Plum­met­ing demand in the West is to blame. Ear­lier this year, as the Amer­i­can gov­ern­ment was buy­ing 61% of Gen­eral Motors and 8% of Chrysler to pre­vent them from col­laps­ing, the two man­u­fac­tur­ers’ sales in China were rock­et­ing. GM’s sales in China in August more than dou­bled on a year ear­lier. For 2009 as a whole the com­pany pre­dicted a 40% rise. Sales of all car brands in China in August were up by about 90%, helped by a cut in the pur­chase tax on smaller, more fuel-efficient cars. There is also huge pent-up demand as a new mid­dle class takes to the road.

Source:  http://​www​.econ​o​mist​.com/​d​a​i​l​y​/​c​h​a​r​t​g​a​l​l​e​r​y​/​d​i​s​p​l​a​y​s​t​o​r​y​.​c​f​m​?​s​t​o​r​y​_​i​d​=​1​4​7​3​2​0​2​6​&​a​m​p​;​f​s​r​c​=​rss

Oil could exceed $100 next year

Octo­ber 26 2009 19:40 | Last updated: Octo­ber 26 2009 19:40Crude oil prices could push above $100 a bar­rel head­ing into 2011 due to a com­bi­na­tion of a cycli­cal improve­ment in demand, the rapid weak­en­ing in the US dol­lar and strong global liq­uid­ity growth, says Fran­cisco Blanch, head of global com­modi­ties research at Bank of America-Merrill Lynch.

Source:  http://​www​.ft​.com/​c​m​s​/​s​/​0​/​5​4​2​b​b​6​d​6​-​c​2​6​4​-​1​1​d​e​-​b​e​3​a​-​0​0​1​4​4​f​e​a​b​4​9​a​.​h​t​m​l​?​f​t​c​a​m​p​=​r​s​s​&​a​m​p​;​n​c​l​i​c​k​_​c​h​e​c​k=1


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in articles you can send, My Practice | Comments Off