Archive for March, 2012

Strategic Problem Solving or What’s The Cost of Losing a Client?

Wednesday, March 28th, 2012

 

by Bob Simp­son, Syn­chronic­ity Per­for­mance Consulting

Every sin­gle day, we are faced with problems:

  • Per­sonal Problems
  • Client Prob­lems
  • Busi­ness Problems
  • Rela­tion­ship Problems
  • Finan­cial Problems

to name a few.

In fact, as a finan­cial advi­sor, you are in the busi­ness of solv­ing problems.

What is your process for solv­ing problems?

Strate­gic Prob­lem Solv­ing is a process that you can refine to pro­duce your sys­tem for solv­ing prob­lems for your­self and your clients.

Step 1 – Quan­tify the problem

One of my goals in work­ing with advi­sors is to “sim­plify every­thing” and focus on doing work that has the great­est impact on suc­cess, or focus on the 20% of activ­i­ties that pro­duce 80% of results.

Rather than fol­low­ing a tra­di­tional approach of “find a problem/fix a prob­lem”, you will achieve grater results by pri­or­i­tiz­ing the prob­lems and work­ing on the most impor­tant ones.  This is achieved by putting a finan­cial value on a problem.

Here’s an exam­ple.  You get a call from a client in which you are informed that this client is trans­fer­ring his account to another advi­sor or more likely, you get a transfer-out notice and no call.  In your dis­cus­sion, you try to iden­tify why your client made this deci­sion and find out that he is not sat­is­fied with fre­quency and qual­ity of contact.

Fol­low­ing the call, you sit at your desk and try to put a num­ber on how much rev­enue you lost as a result of this defec­tion.  This client had $750,000 in a 1% fee-based account.  So you have lost rev­enue of $7,500.  Not so fast.  If you had bet­ter sat­is­fied the client’s needs, this client who is in his early 50’s may have stayed with you for another ten years, for exam­ple.  So the num­ber is $75,000.  Think again.  This client plans to con­tribute $25,000 per year and will, in all like­li­hood, receive an inher­i­tance of $500,000 over the next ten years AND the account should grow, based on a con­ser­v­a­tive asset allo­ca­tion model of 6% per year.  Then, as you plan to retire and sell your busi­ness in ten years at 1.5 times rev­enue, you will lose this as well.

Based on this sce­nario, the loss of this one client will cost you approx­i­mately $86,000 with­out the inher­i­tance and over $113,000 in pre-tax income, if the inher­i­tance was received in the fifth year.

This num­ber gets crazy if you con­sider how many other clients you may lose if you don’t fix this prob­lem and poten­tial refer­rals, if you did a good job.

By quan­ti­fy­ing prob­lems, you are bet­ter able to pri­or­i­tize them and get them resolved before it costs you a small fortune.

How impor­tant do you think it is to solve a prob­lem like this?  How many clients have you lost in the last three years?  Sorry, it was not my inten­tion to make you feel nau­seous.  Maybe, you should get in touch with us?

Step 2 – Iden­tify the root of the problem

Some prob­lems are sim­ple and some are very com­plex.  Com­plex prob­lems can be very dif­fi­cult to solve and require a spe­cial­ized approach.

The first step, in work­ing on a com­plex prob­lem, is to break it down into smaller, more man­age­able prob­lems.  A com­plex prob­lem may be made up of ten or more sim­ple prob­lems.  Some may be sur­face issues that are easy to assess and some may be deeper and more dif­fi­cult to identify.

Your goal should be to drill down and find the root of the prob­lem.  The root may be com­plex but more often than not, it is rel­a­tively sim­ple to solve.  By fix­ing the root, many of the prob­lems you have iden­ti­fied may be resolved quite simply.

Step 3 – Plan to resolve the problem

Some prob­lems can be resolved sim­ply and it may make sense to knock them off quickly but it is impor­tant to give the high value prob­lems the proper pri­or­ity and atten­tion.  Any­thing that may result in the loss of a client is auto­mat­i­cally near the top of the list.

The best way to accom­plish this is to take a project man­age­ment approach to run­ning your busi­ness.  Our blog enti­tled The Project Man­age­ment Approach to Build­ing a Bet­ter Busi­ness will help you to wrap your mind around this concept.

Bob Simp­son is Pres­i­dent of Syn­chronic­ity Per­for­mance Con­sul­tants.  Bob can be reached on his direct line at 905−502−0100, toll free at 866−646−6002 or by e-mail at bob.simpson@synchronicity.ca.

About Bob Simpson

Syn­chronic­ity Per­for­mance Con­sult­ing has been coach­ing finan­cial advi­sors since 1998.

Bob Simp­son, pres­i­dent and founder of Syn­chronic­ity has been involved, directly or indi­rectly in the finan­cial ser­vices indus­try since 1981. He has been a very suc­cess­ful finan­cial advi­sor with Nes­bitt Thom­son Inc., a major Cana­dian finan­cial insti­tu­tion. Between 1981 and 1989, he built a busi­ness with more than $120 mil­lion in assets under man­age­ment, was branch man­ager and SVP National Sales for Mid­land Wal­wyn and has been coach­ing finan­cial advi­sors since 1998.

You can fol­low Bob Simp­son via:


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Advisor Collaboration, Synchronicity | Comments Off


The Art of Asking Questions (Beck)

Wednesday, March 28th, 2012

The Art of Ask­ing Questions

by Michael Beck

Mas­ter­ing the Art of Ask­ing Ques­tions is essen­tial if you want to suc­ceed.  It’s not sim­ply a mat­ter of get­ting in the habit of uti­liz­ing ques­tions in your inter­ac­tions with peo­ple.  It’s really about learn­ing how to ask the right ques­tions at the right time.

Whether you’re hav­ing sales con­ver­sa­tions, coach­ing con­ver­sa­tions, or work­ing to develop oth­ers, learn­ing how to ask good ques­tions can be the dif­fer­ence between suc­cess and fail­ure.  What does ask­ing the right ques­tions at the right time mean?  It means ask­ing ques­tions in such a way as to bet­ter under­stand the other per­son, their needs, and their motivations.

Since the ques­tions asked and the flow of an effec­tive con­ver­sa­tion varies from per­son to per­son and from sit­u­a­tion to sit­u­a­tion, the best way to illus­trate the Art of Ask­ing Ques­tions is by way of example.

Here is a sam­ple sales con­ver­sa­tion, con­ducted by some­one not skilled at the Art of Ask­ing Questions:

DIALOGUE

Hi Bob, I’m call­ing about the great wid­gets my com­pany sells.  Do you have a few min­utes to speak?
“Sure.“
Great!  Are you famil­iar with our brand?
“No, not really.“
We offer wid­gets that solve a num­ber of prob­lems and have some great fea­tures.  The new V210 — our mid-grade model — con­sumes 20% less energy than our com­pe­ti­tion and is 10% smaller.  It comes in three dif­fer­ent col­ors — red, black and white.  Can I sched­ule a time with you to come by and show it to you?
“What’s the price?“
It nor­mally sells for $199, but I can offer it to you at a 25% dis­count — only $149.
“Do you have some­thing you can send me?“
Sure… what address should I send it to?
“123 Main St.“
Great!  I’ll give you a follow-up call in about a week.  OK?
“Yes, that would be fine.”

DIALOGUE

If you’ve been in sales, you already know the out­come of that con­ver­sa­tion.  The like­li­hood of clos­ing a sale is slim and the sales­per­son will no doubt con­tinue to try to reach the prospect again until they get dis­cour­aged and give up.

The next exam­ple is the same con­ver­sa­tion con­ducted by some­one who is bet­ter skilled at the Art of Ask­ing Ques­tions, but is not quite there yet:

DIALOGUE

Hi Bob, my com­pany helps com­pa­nies like yours solve their wid­get prob­lems.  Do you have a few min­utes to talk?
“Sure.“
Do you cur­rently use wid­gets in your busi­ness?
“Yes, we do.“
Have you been pleased with the ones you have?
“Well, for the most part we are, but nothing’s per­fect.“
The newer design of wid­gets have a num­ber of improve­ments over older mod­els.  Would you like to hear more about some of the improve­ments?
“Sure.“
Well, fea­ture 1… , fea­ture 2…, fea­ture 3…  We have a num­ber of dif­fer­ent mod­els avail­able.  Do you have a bud­get in mind?
“Well, we haven’t been actively look­ing up until now.  Can you send me some infor­ma­tion?“
I’d rather come by and show you first-hand so you can really see what I’m talk­ing about.  Which would be bet­ter for you, Tues­day morn­ing or Wednes­day after­noon?
“How about Tues­day morn­ing.“
Great!  I’ll see you Tues­day morn­ing then!

DIALOGUE

While it is pos­si­ble that this sales­per­son may make a sale, it’s far from a sure thing.  Even though the prospect set the appoint­ment, the sales­per­son really doesn’t know any­thing about the prospect or the prospect’s motivations.

The con­ver­sa­tion would unfold very dif­fer­ently if the sales­per­son was skilled in the Art of Ask­ing Questions:

DIALOGUE

Hi Bob, my name is Paul and I help com­pa­nies like yours solve any wid­get prob­lems they have.  Do you have a few min­utes to talk?
“Sure.“
Do you cur­rently use wid­gets in your busi­ness?
“Yes, we do.“
How often do you use your wid­gets?
“Pretty much every day.“
To what extent?  How much?
“About 3–4 hours every day.“
It sounds like you rely on them pretty heav­ily.
“Yes, absolutely.“
What aspects of your wid­gets work best for you?
“Well, for one thing they’ve been really reli­able.  We’ve had them for over 4 years.  Also, we need the auto­mated feed fea­ture and that’s been a life-saver.  And the sup­plies are easy to find and afford­able.“
Sounds like they’ve served you well.  Have you had any prob­lems with them?
“Well, the only prob­lem we’ve had is that they some­times mis­feed.“
When you say they some­times mis­feed, specif­i­cally how often does that hap­pen?
“Only once or twice a day.“
Are there any fea­tures or func­tions you wish they had?
“It would be nice if they had a big­ger bin so we didn’t have to re-stock them so often.“
Any­thing else?  Would it help if they could auto­mat­i­cally stack the fin­ished prod­uct?
“Can they do that?“
Ours can.  I think it would make sense for us to get together.  I can show you a wid­get I have that has a 99% reli­a­bil­ity record, high-speed auto­matic feed­ing with­out jam­ming, a large bin, and auto­mated stack­ing.  Do you have about 25 min­utes on Tues­day morn­ing or would some­thing like Wednes­day after­noon work bet­ter for you?
“Let’s do next Tues­day morning.”

DIALOGUE

As you can see, the last sales con­ver­sa­tion unfolded very dif­fer­ently than the prior two.  In the last con­ver­sa­tion, the sales­per­son asked good ques­tions — ques­tions which uncov­ered what mat­tered to the other per­son, along with some moti­va­tions for mak­ing a change.  (We didn’t have time in this arti­cle to uncover all the motivations.)

Hav­ing a con­ver­sa­tion like this helps the prospect to clar­ify what fea­tures he needed and high­lighted prob­lems and desires.  Both par­ties knew exactly why they were get­ting together and the like­li­hood of clos­ing a sale was extremely high.

When you mas­ter the Art of Ask­ing Ques­tions, you learn to ask ques­tions which uncover moti­va­tions and you’ll do a bet­ter job of sell­ing, coach­ing, and devel­op­ing others.

Writ­ten by Michael Beck, Busi­ness Strate­gist and Exec­u­tive Coach.  If you’d like help mas­ter­ing the Art of Ask­ing Ques­tions, please con­tact me through my web­site: www​.michaeljbeck​.com
Per­mis­sion to reprint with full attri­bu­tion.  © 2011 Michael Beck Inter­na­tional, Inc.


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Michael Beck | Comments Off


Personal Financial Workspaces for Your Clients or Stop Being Average and Start Being Remarkable

Wednesday, March 28th, 2012

 

by Bob Simp­son, Syn­chronic­ity Per­for­mance Consulting

There is one unde­ni­able truth about build­ing a great finan­cial advi­sory practice:

The bet­ter you man­age client rela­tion­ships, the more suc­cess­ful your busi­ness will be.

Unfor­tu­nately, you work in an indus­try that teaches you how to be aver­age.  Man­age­ment and com­pli­ance don’t want you to be dif­fer­ent.  Sure, they would like you to pro­duce more rev­enue, as long as you don’t do any­thing different.

The prob­lem with this the­ory is that clients are demand­ing more.  Aver­age isn’t help­ing them to achieve their goals.  Baby boomers have taken over North America’s wealth and they are more demand­ing than pre­vi­ous generations.

When look­ing at indus­try stan­dards, rela­tion­ship man­age­ment has made the suc­cess­ful tran­si­tion from ran­dom acts of con­tact to MAYBE where most clients have a next con­tact sched­ule in a CRM.

If you are ready for some­thing rad­i­cally dif­fer­ent, I would like to intro­duce you to Client Roadmap:  a pro­gram that allows you to set up Per­sonal Finan­cial Work­spaces for your clients.

What is a Per­sonal Finan­cial Work­space?  It is a secure col­lab­o­ra­tive work­space that allows you, clients and their pro­fes­sional advi­sors to share doc­u­ments, con­ver­sa­tions and infor­ma­tion in the cloud.

What can you do in a Per­sonal Finan­cial Work­space?  You can keep every­thing orga­nized.  You can set up a vault for pri­vate doc­u­ments.  You can sched­ule meet­ings and calls for the next six to twelve months (or more) and have Client Roadmap send out e-mail reminders.  You can set up task lists and assign tasks to you, your team, your clients or their pro­fes­sional advi­sors.  You can set up pages in which they can view infor­ma­tion about their invest­ments so they know what their invest­ment man­agers are doing and why.

Here’s a good exam­ple: A client phones look­ing for a doc­u­ment.  His doc­u­ment is filed some­where and you and your team go search­ing for it.  It takes hours and your client is frus­trated because he needed it yesterday.

With Client Roadmap, all of this client’s doc­u­ments are stored in his per­sonal finan­cial work­space.  He doesn’t need to call.  He just logs in and down­loads the document.

Another exam­ple: A client phones to ask about an invest­ment that she holds.  Sure you can do some research and send it to her.

With Client Roadmap, you set up a tab point­ing directly to pub­lic infor­ma­tion about the invest­ment:  A Morn­ingstar report or one that a fund com­pany updates reg­u­larly on their web­site.  If she wants to check out per­for­mance, infor­ma­tion about port­fo­lio hold­ings or about the invest­ment man­ager, it is all there in real time.

Another exam­ple:

A client is won­der­ing about the sta­tus of some­thing you have promised and calls you to get an update.  You aren’t sure so you ask your assis­tant, who looks it up and reports back to you and then you back to your client.

With Client Roadmap, your client logs into his work­space and right there on the home­page is a report of all out­stand­ing projects and their status.

Another exam­ple:

Your client’s accoun­tant needs infor­ma­tion to pre­pare her tax return.  You get writ­ten per­mis­sion to allow the accoun­tant to access her work­space and you pro­vide tem­po­rary access to allow him to find the infor­ma­tion he needs.  When that is com­plete, you click a but­ton and no more access.

Another exam­ple:

You are look­ing for a bet­ter way to get newslet­ters or quar­terly mar­ket com­ments to your clients.

With Client Roadmap, you can set up a feed directly in the client work­space and every time you update your newslet­ter it is updated and pre­vi­ous ver­sions stored in your pri­vate client workspace.

Final exam­ple:

You meet with a client and make notes about the meet­ing.  Your client asks you a ques­tion about some of the things you discussed.

In Client Roadmap, you put your client notes right on the front page of the work­space for your client to access at any time.  Plus, if he sees some­thing he does not agree with, he can make a com­ment right in the work­space and you get e-mail notification.

Sound com­pli­cated?  As with all tech­no­log­i­cal solu­tions, there is a learn­ing curve and set up time required.   We can help you to set up a tem­plate and then all you need to do is to clone the work­space.  New work­spaces can be set up with a new series of meet­ings and calls in approx­i­mately 20 min­utes.  You will eas­ily make this up through sit­u­a­tions like the exam­ples above.

Per­sonal Finan­cial Work­spaces allow you to work more col­lab­o­ra­tively and with full trans­parency.  These are two major pieces to more effec­tive client rela­tion­ship management.

Stop being aver­age and start being remark­able and your per­sonal and busi­ness per­for­mance will improve dramatically.

Bob Simp­son is Pres­i­dent of Syn­chronic­ity Per­for­mance Con­sul­tants.  Bob can be reached on his direct line at 905−502−0100, toll free at 866−646−6002 or by e-mail at bob.simpson@synchronicity.ca.


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Advisor Collaboration, My Practice, Synchronicity | Comments Off


Two words to get in front of prospects

Wednesday, March 28th, 2012

Even advi­sors who are suc­cess­ful in every other aspect of their busi­ness often strug­gle when it comes to get­ting meet­ings with prospects.

That’s under­stand­able at one level; peo­ple are besieged with demands on their time and many prospects are deeply skep­ti­cal about any­one seen to be try­ing to sell them some­thing. At the same time if we can get past those bar­ri­ers, unhap­pi­ness with recent mar­kets and uncer­tainty about their finances has cre­ated an oppor­tu­nity to engage poten­tial new clients.

The key to cap­i­tal­iz­ing on this oppor­tu­nity is to under­stand how prospec­tive clients look at requests for action, and to frame any­thing we ask of prospects with two words in mind.

How prospec­tive clients look at things:

Let’s say you ask a prospec­tive client for a meet­ing or to attend a lun­cheon sem­i­nar. Imme­di­ately, he or she weighs two things.

First prospects look at the poten­tial upside, the ben­e­fit. And then against that they weigh the pos­si­ble down­side, the risk. Note that prospects don’t make this deci­sion con­sciously; it takes place at an instinc­tive, sub­con­scious level. In fact most of the time it hap­pens in a split second.

Some advi­sors who don’t get a pos­i­tive response con­clude that they haven’t done a suf­fi­cient job of demon­strat­ing the ben­e­fits of meet­ing, so they respond by show­ing more ben­e­fits. If that doesn’t work they pile on still more ben­e­fits. While that might work some­times, often the more you try to change a prospect’s mind by show­ing more ben­e­fits, the more it feels like a sales pitch and the more their guards go up.

When ask­ing your prospects for a com­mit­ment, by all means demon­strate the ben­e­fit of their say­ing yes. But don’t for­get the other side of the equa­tion, the down­side. In addi­tion to show­ing ben­e­fits, con­sider two words that can be crit­i­cal to suc­cess in get­ting prospects to agree: Reduce risk.

There are four ways to reduce the risk for prospects; bor­row cred­i­bil­ity, build your rep­u­ta­tion, reduce the time you’re ask­ing for, focus on a lower risk commitment.

Bor­row credibility:

Every advi­sor knows that refer­rals are the best way to get new clients. That’s because refer­rals involve a trans­fer of trust; when a sat­is­fied client refers you to some­one they know your client’s trust is trans­ferred to their friend.

But there are other ways to bor­row cred­i­bil­ity beyond referrals:

· Write in local newspapers

Seek out oppor­tu­ni­ties to have your views on finan­cial plan­ning issues or mar­kets pub­lished in your local news­pa­per. Hav­ing that arti­cle on your web­site or send­ing it to prospec­tive clients helps posi­tion you as an expert and reduces the risk of deal­ing with you.

An advi­sor who focuses on “sud­denly sin­gle” wid­ows and women get­ting divorced after long mar­riages has built her busi­ness by writ­ing about the issues these women face. In the process, she has become the go-to resource for local radio and news­pa­pers when­ever they are look­ing for an expert to talk about issues involv­ing wid­ows and divorcees.

· Seek out speak­ing opportunities

Another way to get expert posi­tion­ing is by seek­ing out speak­ing oppor­tu­ni­ties to mem­bers of your tar­get client community.

One advi­sor built his busi­ness by mak­ing a con­certed effort to get on as many plat­forms with qual­i­fied prospects as pos­si­ble. Early on, he had one of his talks video­taped, so he could send this to the pro­gram chair of local orga­ni­za­tions, in the process reduc­ing the risk of them invit­ing him to speak.

He always fin­ished his talks with a draw and asked for per­mis­sion on the bal­lots to put peo­ple on the email list for his monthly com­men­tary. In short order he had hun­dreds of prospects that were get­ting his monthly mate­r­ial, with a steady stream of requests for appoint­ments as a result.

· Use tes­ti­mo­ni­als

If you’re invit­ing prospects to a lunch work­shop, con­sider includ­ing tes­ti­mo­ni­als from pre­vi­ous atten­dees as to the value that they received from attending.

Build your reputation

A sec­ond way to reduce risk is to build your word of mouth reputation.

Many advi­sors in mid-sized com­mu­ni­ties have found that high pro­file com­mu­nity activ­ity raises their vis­i­bil­ity and improves the response when talk­ing to prospec­tive clients. Tak­ing a lead­er­ship role in a respected char­ity can make you safer to deal with.

Another approach is to focus the clients you deal with, so that word of mouth kicks in and the “safety in num­bers” effect works for you. Let’s sup­pose you’re talk­ing to a retiree or busi­ness owner and can legit­i­mately say that you spe­cial­ize in work­ing with peo­ple in their sit­u­a­tion; if they’ve come across your name, the risk of doing busi­ness with you has just dropped.

Reduce the time involved:

Another way to reduce risk is to reduce the time com­mit­ment you’re ask­ing for.

Many advi­sors focus on get­ting prospects to come to the advisor’s office for an ini­tial meet­ing. Unless they hap­pen to be close by, this can present a has­sle in terms of travel time and parking.

In an arti­cle last sum­mer, I described one advi­sor who has suc­ceeded in get­ting in front of poten­tial clients by both demon­strat­ing a clear ben­e­fit and reduc­ing risk. He offers to take high net worth prospects through a check list of 20 ways that afflu­ent investors go wrong, based on research with mil­lion­aires con­ducted by US Trust. Hav­ing iden­ti­fied a tan­gi­ble ben­e­fit to sit­ting down, he then reduces risk by sug­gest­ing they meet for half an hour at a cof­fee shop close to the prospect’s office.

Ask­ing for a lower risk commitment:

The final strat­egy to reduce risk is ask­ing for a lower com­mit­ment. For many prospec­tive clients, meet­ing face to face rep­re­sents more of an oblig­a­tion than they’re com­fort­able with.

One advi­sor has had good suc­cess by invit­ing prospec­tive clients to 60 minute lun­cheon round­ta­bles for exist­ing clients. The key is in the wording:

“I keep these lunches to one hour. Over sand­wiches, I update my clients on what’s hap­pen­ing in mar­kets and answer ques­tions. While these lunches are pri­mar­ily for exist­ing clients, I do have a spot avail­able at the next lunch com­ing up two weeks from Fri­day, should you be inter­ested in sit­ting in.”

Other advi­sors use a two-step process to reduce risk. Stage One is to offer to add prospec­tive clients to monthly emails that go to exist­ing clients, fea­tur­ing rel­e­vant arti­cles from pub­li­ca­tions such as For­tune, Forbes or Bloomberg Busi­ness Week. This is as non-threatening a com­mit­ment that you can ask from poten­tial clients. Once prospects have received these for six months or so, you’ve built famil­iar­ity and cred­i­bil­ity and it becomes lower risk for prospects to agree to a meeting.

When talk­ing to prospec­tive clients, by all means main­tain your focus on the ben­e­fit of meet­ing. But to max­i­mize your chances of suc­cess, don’t for­get the other side of the equa­tion and to look for ways to reduce risk as well.


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Dan Richards | Comments Off


How to make clients recognize your value

Wednesday, March 28th, 2012

Over the past decade, con­sul­tants and speak­ers at con­fer­ences have told advi­sors that they need a dis­tinc­tive branded process to dif­fer­en­ti­ate them­selves. As a result, a grow­ing num­ber have cre­ated a “unique process” to set them apart.

Despite this, most advi­sors strug­gle to get clients to see their value. A recent round­table lunch drove this home, as many suc­cess­ful advi­sors talked about their frus­tra­tion on this issue. Then a com­ment by one par­tic­i­pant shed some light on what advi­sors need to do to con­vey value.

Here’s what he said:

“A few years ago, I spent a ton of time on fine tun­ing the way I artic­u­late my process. I hired a designer and a brand­ing con­sul­tant; and the six step process we ended up with looks great on my web­site. For some rea­son, though, it really doesn’t seem to res­onate with clients.”

Same­ness rather than differentiation:

This advi­sor is very typ­i­cal; and his com­ment illus­trates two big prob­lems with what con­sul­tants have been say­ing on this issue.

First, if you take a look at the web­sites of many advi­sors, you’ll see a “unique process” gen­er­ally con­sist­ing of four, five or six steps. These processes have dif­fer­ent names and con­fig­u­ra­tions but ulti­mately look alike. As a result, what was intended to be a dif­fer­en­tia­tor has ended up con­vey­ing sameness.

That’s not the biggest prob­lem, though. The really sig­nif­i­cant prob­lem is that this focus on process has led many advi­sors down the entirely wrong path.

A fea­ture or a benefit:

The very first train­ing course that I attended after grad­u­at­ing from busi­ness school many years ago was a course on basic sell­ing skills. First on the agenda was a dis­cus­sion of fea­tures vs. benefits.

“If you’re sell­ing a cup of cof­fee” the instruc­tor said, “buy­ers don’t care that the beans were grown on a sunny hill­side in Colom­bia, and hand­picked at their peak, then roasted in small batches. Those are all features.

“What buy­ers care about is the ben­e­fit of a great tast­ing cup of cof­fee. You may need to talk about attrib­utes to make the ben­e­fit believ­able; but never for­get that peo­ple don’t buy fea­tures, they buy ben­e­fits. Start with ben­e­fits to get buyer’s atten­tion, then fol­low with fea­tures for credibility.”

In most web­sites fea­tur­ing an advisor’s “unique process,” you have to work hard to find the pay­off. In essence, the ben­e­fit had been obscured by the features.

Start­ing with the right benefit:

You need to start by clearly artic­u­lat­ing exactly the ben­e­fit that clients obtain by work­ing with you. Your ben­e­fit can be fairly broad or very nar­row and can be focused on invest­ments or on broader finan­cial out­comes. In some cases the ben­e­fit needs a bit of elab­o­ra­tion; in each exam­ple below, the ben­e­fit is in bold.

Here are three invest­ment focused approaches:

· We select man­agers with the demon­strated abil­ity to out­per­form over full mar­ket cycles:

o We focus on invest­ment man­agers with a proven process and estab­lished track record of find­ing under­val­ued com­pa­nies; employ­ing the same con­trar­ian invest­ment prin­ci­ples used by War­ren Buf­fett. Even though these man­agers may lag over short peri­ods, over time this approach has added con­sid­er­able value to client portfolios.

· We deliver supe­rior risk adjusted returns over time:

o To do that, we use a proven cash-flow focused approach to eval­u­ate stocks and bonds and to con­struct truly diver­si­fied port­fo­lios; reg­u­larly rebal­anc­ing those port­fo­lios to con­tain risk.

· We help afflu­ent Cana­di­ans con­trol port­fo­lio volatil­ity while still achiev­ing cap­i­tal growth:

o Using the same risk man­age­ment prin­ci­ples employed by uni­ver­sity endow­ments and pen­sion plans. As part of this, we tap into alter­na­tive invest­ment vehi­cles and solu­tions that are typ­i­cally only avail­able to sophis­ti­cated investors.

Here are three ben­e­fit state­ments that focus on broad finan­cial outcomes:

· Work­ing with clients plan­ning for retire­ment, we instill con­fi­dence that they’ll achieve their finan­cial goals:

o We start by cus­tomiz­ing a finan­cial and invest­ment plan to each client’s unique needs and objec­tives. Hav­ing devel­oped that plan, we help clients adhere to it through both good and bad mar­kets; we see our­selves as an emo­tional anchor for our clients, keep­ing the highs from being too high and the lows from being too low.

· We cre­ate peace of mind for retirees:

o By ensur­ing that they won’t have to worry about fund­ing their retire­ment years, devel­op­ing detailed invest­ment and cash flow plans and stress test­ing those plans to ensure that they’ll deliver pos­i­tive cash flow under a broad range of scenarios.

· We min­i­mize the tax bur­den for our clients:

o Using advanced tax plan­ning strate­gies and employ­ing tax advan­taged insur­ance and invest­ment solu­tions to deliver effi­cient after tax income.

Finally, here are four nar­row ben­e­fit statements:

· We advise suc­cess­ful exec­u­tives, pro­fes­sion­als and busi­ness own­ers on max­i­miz­ing tax effi­cient income and trans­fer­ring wealth to suc­ces­sive generations.

· We spe­cial­ize in work­ing with suc­cess­ful entre­pre­neurs to real­ize max­i­mum value from their busi­nesses, col­lab­o­rat­ing with exist­ing pro­fes­sional advi­sors to imple­ment inte­grated tax, estate and invest­ment plan­ning strategies.

· We help med­ical pro­fes­sion­als plan for today and tomor­row, man­ag­ing cur­rent busi­ness and per­sonal finances in the most tax effec­tive fash­ion pos­si­ble while imple­ment­ing plans to ensure that long term goals are attained.

· We work with entre­pre­neurs mov­ing to Canada to launch busi­nesses, help­ing clients nav­i­gate the com­plex­ity of work­ing in a dif­fer­ent cul­tural and finan­cial landscape.

Bring­ing your ben­e­fit to life:

While a strong ben­e­fit state­ment is a good start­ing point, that’s typ­i­cally all it is. The chal­lenge is to make that ben­e­fit real; for it to be more than just words.

That’s where the process that allows you to deliver that ben­e­fit comes in. With exist­ing clients, use every meet­ing to remind clients of your key ben­e­fit and where they stand in the process that you use to deliver that ben­e­fit. It may not be the very first thing you talk about, but it should fea­ture prominently.

And find a way to rein­force your key ben­e­fit in writ­ten com­mu­ni­ca­tion to clients. If you send fre­quent mar­ket let­ters, you may not want to make your ben­e­fit the cen­ter­piece of every let­ter (rep­e­ti­tion that’s too fre­quent can cause clients to lose inter­est and stop read­ing), but your ben­e­fit should always be there, and from time to time should be promi­nently featured.

With prospec­tive clients, you’ve got a dif­fer­ent chal­lenge. Because the typ­i­cal process can look generic and abstract, look for ways to make your ben­e­fit more tangible.

If your com­pli­ance depart­ment and reg­u­la­tory envi­ron­ment allow them, tes­ti­mo­ni­als can be an effec­tive way to do this.

Another way to bring your ben­e­fit to life is with case stud­ies. If your focus is on invest­ment out­comes, use past peri­ods to demon­strate how your approach pro­duced results. And if your ben­e­fit is more broadly focused on finan­cial issues, you can use the clas­sic case study frame­work (Prob­lem, Solu­tion, Results) to make your story compelling.

This arti­cle pro­vides more details on how case stud­ies can work:

http://​www​.cli​entin​sights​.ca/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​u​s​i​n​g​-​c​a​s​e​-​s​t​u​d​i​e​s​-​t​o​-​m​a​k​e​-​y​o​u​r​-​c​ase

None of this dimin­ishes the impor­tance of hav­ing a well-articulated process. Just remem­ber that your process alone isn’t suf­fi­cient to con­vey value to exist­ing and prospec­tive clients. Never for­get that your process is there to sup­port your ben­e­fit, and never for­get the les­son from that old sales trainer; lead with ben­e­fit, and fol­low with fea­tures.


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Dan Richards | Comments Off


To Blog, or Not to Blog, That is the Question

Tuesday, March 27th, 2012

 

by Bob Simp­son, Syn­chronic­ity Per­for­mance Consulting

For most advi­sors, main­tain­ing a web­site and writ­ing a blog is a major waste of time.  It takes a ton of work to set up a web­site and devel­op­ing con­tent is a major task.  Advi­sor web­sites tend to be glo­ri­fied brochures that don’t attract much traf­fic, drive lit­tle busi­ness and do a poor job of differentiation.

Web­sites and blogs are part of your brand­ing and can play a major role in help­ing you achieve your busi­ness goals but they need to be done prop­erly.  If you are will­ing to allo­cate resources to build an above aver­age web­site, it will pay div­i­dends.  If you sim­ply need an online brochure, you can set some­thing up inex­pen­sively but don’t expect an ROI.

A big prob­lem you will face in devel­op­ing your web­site is:  “How do I make my web­site inter­est­ing?”  “How do I develop a site that peo­ple will visit reg­u­larly and rec­om­mend to their friends and colleagues?”

That’s where blog­ging comes in.  If you build a web­site that has the basics:

  • About Us
  • Con­tact Us
  • How We are Different
  • Descrip­tion of Services

you will have the foun­da­tion for your online brochure.  This is fairly easy to write.

By adding a Blog tab and con­tribut­ing reg­u­larly, you can build inter­est­ing con­tent that will attract read­ers and increase the chances of your web­site being found by poten­tial clients.

If you have been writ­ing a newslet­ter for a num­ber of years, you have a stock­pile of compliance-approved arti­cles from which you can draw.   Start by pulling your best arti­cles and add one or two to your blog each week.  If you are will­ing to com­mit the time to writ­ing new arti­cles on a weekly basis, post all your old arti­cles up front but make sure you are com­mit­ted to posted weekly or bi-weekly.  Try to have a min­i­mum of four compliance-approved arti­cles writ­ten in advance in case you get busy to min­i­mize dead­line pressure.

If you have a Word­Press web­site, post­ing blogs is as sim­ple as writ­ing the arti­cle in Microsoft Word, log­ging into the back­end of your web­site, click­ing “add new post”, past­ing the arti­cle and hit­ting “submit”.

My goal is to write three arti­cles per week for my blog.  This takes a great deal of time but has pro­vided a good ROI, largely because Advi­sor Ana­lyst dis­trib­utes my arti­cles to over 28,000 advi­sors.  If you can find a sim­i­lar arrange­ment, you will be much more moti­vated to write your articles.

We take two addi­tional steps to attract read­ers.  We dis­trib­ute a newslet­ter twice a month to peo­ple on our mail­ing list.  Our newslet­ter is very sim­ple to pro­duce as we pro­vide intro­duc­tions to arti­cles and links to recent blogs.  We added a “Top 10 Blogs” tab on our web­site and are con­vert­ing these blogs into an eBook.

Another advan­tage of hav­ing a blog on your web­site is that it improves your con­tent and search engine rank­ings.  Work hard to make sure that search terms that peo­ple who meet your ideal client pro­file might use to find an advi­sor are in both titles and the body of the blog.  Remem­ber, peo­ple do not search for “finan­cial advi­sor” as fre­quently as they do to find a solu­tion to a prob­lem.  To prove this point, I am writ­ing this arti­cle because I know a lot of advi­sors are won­der­ing whether they should be writ­ing a blog.

One of the chal­lenges you will face is to find top­ics to write about.  The approach I find most effec­tive is to keep your eyes and ears open to opportunities:

  • You have a meet­ing with a client and help her solve a prob­lem.  Write up a case study.
  • You attend a port­fo­lio man­ager pre­sen­ta­tion.  Write up the highlights.
  • You read an arti­cle.  Dis­cuss the arti­cle and link your blog to the article.
  • You meet with an accoun­tant or attor­ney. Dis­cuss some new meth­ods to min­i­mize taxes.
  • You read a book.  Do a book review.
  • You watched a video.  Embed the video into your blog and then write about it.  See Let’s Get Positive!

You may want to down­load the Dragon Nat­u­rally Speak­ing iPhone appli­ca­tion and after attend­ing a port­fo­lio man­ager pre­sen­ta­tion, just start talk­ing about what you just learned.  Blogs should be well-written but don’t have to be per­fect.  Try to keep your blog arti­cles under 500 words.  This is just under 800 words.

The process of writ­ing a blog will make you a bet­ter advi­sor.  It forces you to think about and be cur­rent on a broad range of wealth man­age­ment topics.

If social media is part of your busi­ness devel­op­ment plan, a blog should be at the top of your list.   Before you look at alter­na­tive strate­gies, like Face­book and Twit­ter, get your blog done prop­erly and then branch out.

Bob Simp­son is Pres­i­dent of Syn­chronic­ity Per­for­mance Con­sul­tants.  Bob can be reached on his direct line at 905−502−0100, toll free at 866−646−6002 or by e-mail at bob.simpson@synchronicity.ca.

About Bob Simpson

Syn­chronic­ity Per­for­mance Con­sult­ing has been coach­ing finan­cial advi­sors since 1998.

Bob Simp­son, pres­i­dent and founder of Syn­chronic­ity has been involved, directly or indi­rectly in the finan­cial ser­vices indus­try since 1981. He has been a very suc­cess­ful finan­cial advi­sor with Nes­bitt Thom­son Inc., a major Cana­dian finan­cial insti­tu­tion. Between 1981 and 1989, he built a busi­ness with more than $120 mil­lion in assets under man­age­ment, was branch man­ager and SVP National Sales for Mid­land Wal­wyn and has been coach­ing finan­cial advi­sors since 1998.

You can fol­low Bob Simp­son via:


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Advisor Collaboration, Synchronicity | Comments Off


Emerging a Winner from a Period of Turmoil

Tuesday, March 27th, 2012

Today’s arti­cle focuses on what it will take for advi­sors to emerge as win­ners from the tur­moil in which the indus­try cur­rently finds itself.

My Decem­ber col­umn in Invest­ment Exec­u­tive starts with the premise that a new breed of empow­ered cus­tomers and aggres­sive com­peti­tors have changed the rules of the game for most man­u­fac­tur­ers and retail­ers — and are in the process of doing the same for the invest­ment industry.

The only way to ensure that you’ll emerge a win­ner from this process is through an intense, sin­gle minded focus on pro­vid­ing com­pelling, out­stand­ing value — today, pro­vid­ing tepid value means you’re toast.

Many finan­cial advi­sors rec­og­nize that the tra­di­tional busi­ness model is seri­ously chal­lenged. What is less clear is what will replace it going forward.

In my view, there will not be one suc­cess­ful model going for­ward — rather there will be a vari­ety of approaches.

The one thing they’ll have in com­mon is a clearer and higher stan­dard of value than existed in the past.

As you think about where you’re going to take your busi­ness in 2010and beyond, you need to answer two key questions.

Defin­ing your value

First and fore­most, what’s your response if a prospec­tive client says to you: “What’s the unique value that you pro­vide your clients?”

It’s a cliché to say that not long ago investors paid for trans­ac­tions and access to infor­ma­tion and got advice for free. Today, more and more investors see trans­ac­tions and infor­ma­tion as com­modi­ties– the only thing left for advi­sors to charge for is supe­rior advice that makes sense of the over­whelm­ing vol­ume of infor­ma­tion and assim­i­lates it into a sen­si­ble plan, as well as effec­tive ongo­ing com­mu­ni­ca­tion around that plan.

In some cases that plan focuses on invest­ment or insur­ance advice alone, in other instances advi­sors also pro­vide a broad range of advice on wealth issues such as tax and estate plan­ning and char­i­ta­ble giving.

And in some cases, advi­sors focus on a sub­set of investors such as busi­ness own­ers, retirees or investors plan­ning for retire­ment with a view to pro­vid­ing spe­cial­ized exper­tise that “gen­er­al­ist” advi­sors can’t match, other advi­sors take a more broadly based “all-comers” approach to the clients they serve.

It’s impor­tant to note that the value doesn’t nor­mally reside in the plan itself — the value resides in what the plan and the com­mu­ni­ca­tion around that plan achieve.

In some cases, that might be con­crete tax savings.

In oth­ers, it will be value for money, with investors feel­ing their port­fo­lio is in bet­ter shape by work­ing with their advi­sor than it would be if they were else­where or doing this on their own.

In other instances, the value might be clients’ peace of mind or the abil­ity to avoid hav­ing to spend a great deal of time think­ing about their invest­ments, con­fi­dent that their advi­sor is on top of things and is watch­ing out for their interests.

And in still oth­ers, the value might be feel­ing good about the level of atten­tion they are get­ting from their advi­sor and his or her team en route to achiev­ing their goals.

Or it could be an intan­gi­ble — some­thing I’ve learned in my time in the indus­try is to never under­es­ti­mate the impor­tance of investors sim­ply lik­ing the advi­sor they deal with (bear­ing in mind that “like­abil­ity” was the hall­mark of fraud­sters like Bernie Mad­off and Earl Jones.)

What­ever it is that dri­ves value for you, the key first step is to be crys­tal clear about that — just remem­ber that the value bar has gone up. What was per­ceived as excep­tional value by clients yes­ter­day won’t nec­es­sar­ily be per­ceived as excep­tional value tomorrow.

Deliv­er­ing value

The sec­ond ques­tion relates to how you deliver that value — many of today’s skep­ti­cal cus­tomers say “talk is cheap” and demand con­crete evi­dence to back up your claims.
Begin by sum­ma­riz­ing all the time and money you spent on your busi­ness this past year — and divide that time and money into three categories.

The first cat­e­gory are those expen­di­tures that are the cost of doing busi­ness; cus­tomers aren’t pre­pared to pay the cost of keep­ing the lights on, so you need to keep these to a minimum.

Every­thing else falls into two cat­e­gories — “good expen­di­tures” of time and money that trans­late into clear per­ceived value for clients and “bad expen­di­tures” that don’t. Your goal is to max­i­mize the dis­cre­tionary expen­di­tures that drive value and to min­i­mize those that don’t.

Here’s a sim­ple exam­ple. One advi­sor I recently talked to laboured for many hours over his monthly newslet­ter, deter­mined to get the words exactly right — this was a major invest­ment of time on his part.

Ear­lier this year, he ini­ti­ated a Client Advi­sory Board, invit­ing eight of his best clients to serve as an advi­sory group that he could con­sult with. When he brought up his newslet­ter, the uni­ver­sal response around the table was “Who cares?” Few of the clients around the table paid much atten­tion to it and none would miss it.

In fact, rather than his own newslet­ter, almost all of his clients said they’d pre­fer to receive care­fully cho­sen arti­cles from cred­i­ble, third party sources.

This is a clas­sic exam­ple of a “bad cost” — he was spend­ing a sig­nif­i­cant amount of time on some­thing that rep­re­sented mar­ginal value to clients.

Divid­ing every­thing you do into those three cat­e­gories can be an ardu­ous process — but it can also be an illu­mi­nat­ing one that will clar­ify how you can max­i­mize the value you deliver clients.

For the full arti­cle in Invest­ment Exec­u­tive, includ­ing talk­ing about tim­ing to imple­ment change, click below:
http://​www​.invest​mentex​ec​u​tive​.com/​c​l​i​e​n​t​/​e​n​/​N​e​w​s​/​D​e​t​a​i​l​N​e​w​s​.​a​s​p​?​I​d​=​5​1​6​3​9​&​a​m​p​;​c​a​t​=​3​0​&​a​m​p​;​I​d​S​e​c​t​i​o​n​=​3​0​&​a​m​p​;​P​a​g​e​M​e​m​=​&​a​m​p​;​n​b​N​e​w​s​=​&​a​m​p​;​I​d​P​u​b​=​188


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Dan Richards | Comments Off


Numbers Confuse, Information Empowers

Tuesday, March 27th, 2012

 

by Bob Simp­son, Syn­chronic­ity Per­for­mance Consulting

Have you ever been in a meet­ing with another pro­fes­sional, like an accoun­tant or lawyer, where num­bers are fly­ing through the air like debris in a tornado?

How did you react? I’ll bet, at some point, you politely tuned out.

Invest­ment and wealth man­age­ment are very num­bers focused. Clients receive monthly state­ments that present NUMBERS. When you do a quar­terly review, more NUMBERS. What is finan­cial plan­ning all about?: NUMBERS. Retire­ment pro­jec­tions are NUMBERS. When a client phones you, they need to look up your phone NUMBER. OK, maybe the last one is a stretch.

The prob­lem is that almost the entire indus­try is based on NUMBERS: price earn­ings ratios, alphas, betas, MERs, fee rates, etc. and NUMBERS confuse.

How many of your clients can answer the fol­low­ing ques­tions about invest­ments they hold?:

What is the pur­pose of this invest­ment?
What is the time­frame for hold­ing this invest­ment?
Why did we pur­chase this invest­ment?
Who is man­ag­ing this invest­ment?
How is this per­son or team qual­i­fied to man­age this invest­ment?
What is the over­all invest­ment cli­mate today and how will that affect the value of this invest­ment?
What is the expected return for this invest­ment over this time­frame?
What is the worst-case sce­nario for this invest­ment over this time­frame?
Is this a rel­a­tive return or an absolute return invest­ment?
How will fac­tors, like eco­nomic growth, inter­est rate or cur­rency changes affect this invest­ment?
What role does this invest­ment play when com­bined with other invest­ments in this port­fo­lio?
What is the best way to track this manager’s strategy?

OK, I must admit that some of the ques­tions above are NUMBERS questions.

I think it is a good idea to spend one day per quar­ter com­pletely ded­i­cated to research­ing and man­ag­ing invest­ments. I like the idea of form­ing an invest­ment com­mit­tee with peo­ple whose exper­tise and knowl­edge you respect. This may include your favorite whole­salers. By the end of the day, you should have all the infor­ma­tion and doc­u­men­ta­tion you need for your quar­terly client meet­ings and meet­ing packages.

By devel­op­ing a list of ques­tions, like the list above, you have a process for approv­ing invest­ments and invest­ment man­agers but more impor­tantly you have infor­ma­tion to share with your clients. This infor­ma­tion and a pur­pose or goals-based approach, like the one we wrote about in a pre­vi­ous blog A Sim­ple Method to Improve Your Clients’ Invest­ment Per­for­mance, will help your clients feel empow­ered, rather than con­fused, when mak­ing deci­sions about their invest­ments. This con­fi­dence will help them to bet­ter process the infor­ma­tion they access over the Inter­net or in the press and make more con­fi­dent decisions.

Empow­ered clients appre­ci­ate all the hard work you do in research­ing invest­ment rec­om­men­da­tions and are more likely to refer friends and colleagues.

Dur­ing the week of March 19th, we will be ask­ing mem­bers of our LinkedIn group Advi­sor Col­lab­o­ra­tion to sug­gest other ques­tions to include in a due dili­gence process.

We have devel­oped a unique new approach to directly link­ing your clients to infor­ma­tion about their invest­ments that auto­mates shar­ing of infor­ma­tion. If you have not yet watched our 2-minute video on Client Roadmap, visit www​.clien​troadmap​.com.

Bob Simp­son is Pres­i­dent of Syn­chronic­ity Per­for­mance Con­sul­tants. Bob can be reached on his direct line at 905−502−0100, toll free at 866−646−6002 or by e-mail at bob.simpson@synchronicity.ca.

About Bob Simpson

Syn­chronic­ity Per­for­mance Con­sult­ing has been coach­ing finan­cial advi­sors since 1998.

Bob Simp­son, pres­i­dent and founder of Syn­chronic­ity has been involved, directly or indi­rectly in the finan­cial ser­vices indus­try since 1981. He has been a very suc­cess­ful finan­cial advi­sor with Nes­bitt Thom­son Inc., a major Cana­dian finan­cial insti­tu­tion. Between 1981 and 1989, he built a busi­ness with more than $120 mil­lion in assets under man­age­ment, was branch man­ager and SVP National Sales for Mid­land Wal­wyn and has been coach­ing finan­cial advi­sors since 1998.

You can fol­low Bob Simp­son via:


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Advisor Collaboration, Synchronicity | Comments Off


A Simple Method to Improve Your Clients’ Investment Performance

Thursday, March 22nd, 2012

There is a great arti­cle by Louis S. Har­vey of Dal­bar enti­tled Purpose-Based Asset Man­age­ment.

When I read this arti­cle, my ini­tial reac­tion was that this sim­pli­fied method would result in peo­ple walk­ing out of an advisor’s office, climb­ing into the car and say­ing to his or her spouse:

Dear.  For the first time in my entire life, I think I finally under­stand how to invest our money.”

You should spend a cou­ple of min­utes read­ing the arti­cle before read­ing the rest of this arti­cle.  It is only six pages and has graphs.

OK.  Back with me now?  Here is how I would describe this process to a client:

When I started in the indus­try, I used to sit through pre­sen­ta­tions by our Chief Econ­o­mist and walk out won­der­ing what lan­guage he was speak­ing.  Invest­ing and wealth man­age­ment can be very con­fus­ing and over­whelm­ing.  It is our job to take com­plex finan­cial prod­ucts and ser­vices, fil­ter them and trans­late them into a lan­guage that most peo­ple can understand.

To be hon­est, most peo­ple don’t under­stand how to invest their money.  Most advi­sors take them through a fact-finding process to help iden­tify finan­cial prob­lems and then rec­om­mend a port­fo­lio of stocks, bonds and mutual funds.  The port­fo­lio is devel­oped to gen­er­ate returns to help grow invest­ments over time.

Port­fo­lios are gen­er­ally devel­oped based on the level of risk you are able to with­stand.  Most advi­sors gen­er­ate a sin­gle risk tol­er­ance and develop a port­fo­lio based on that.

We do things quite dif­fer­ently.  One of the first things that we try to iden­tify is the pur­poses for your money.   Let me give you a cou­ple of examples.

Most peo­ple have mul­ti­ple ways in which they plan to use money.  Most peo­ple like to have an emer­gency fund or need to save money for retire­ment.  Oth­ers have chil­dren who plan to attend col­leges or uni­ver­si­ties, and some plan to pur­chase a recre­ational prop­erty or help their chil­dren to pur­chase homes.

I have placed sev­eral buck­ets on my desk to help you under­stand this process.  Some buck­ets are large, some are medium sized and some are small.  Each bucket rep­re­sents a pur­pose for your money.

Your retire­ment bucket may be one of the large ones.  A large bucket requires more money to fill.  One bucket may be edu­cat­ing your chil­dren.  This may be a medium bucket.  Another may be for the pur­chase of a new car.  That bucket is rel­a­tively small.

Some buck­ets need to be filled within a short time span.  In the exam­ples above, your new car bucket may need to be filled within the next two years.  Your retire­ment bucket, on the other hand, may not need to be filled for twenty years or more.

When you invest money, one of the major fac­tors for iden­ti­fy­ing risk is the length of time before the money is required.  If you have a short time­frame, you can­not assume much risk because there are a lot of things that can and will go wrong in a short period of time.  If some­thing goes wrong, you don’t have time to recover and there­fore, you need to be very con­ser­v­a­tive in the way you invest that money.

If you will not be using money in one of the buck­ets for over twenty years, you can take more risk.  If you lose 20% of your cap­i­tal in one year, you have lots of time to recover.  This becomes really impor­tant when you review invest­ment per­for­mance of the major stock indexes.  Approx­i­mately 50% of the time over the past 111 years, the stock mar­ket has gained more than 16% or lost more than 16% in a sin­gle year.

Let’s use 2008 as an exam­ple.  If you invested a one-year bucket in stocks at the begin­ning of the year, you lost 34% of your money that year.  Let’s say, your new car bucket had $40,000 in it at the begin­ning of 2008 and you planned to buy a new car at the end of the year.  You invested in the Dow Jones Indus­trial Aver­age at the begin­ning of the year and at the end of the year, your invest­ment was only worth $26,400 and you are nowhere close to buy­ing your new car.

If you invested a 25 year bucket in the Dow Jones Indus­trial Aver­age, you have time to recover from your loss and although it was uncom­fort­able, your bucket has more money in it today, espe­cially con­sid­er­ing that you have added per­sonal funds to this bucket as per your plan, than you did at the begin­ning of 2008.

So the task ahead of us today is to put some labels on each of these buck­ets, deter­mine how much you need to fill each bucket and put a time­frame on when they need to be filled.  Some buck­ets, like your retire­ment bucket, will be more dif­fi­cult to esti­mate how much money will be required to fill it but we have lots of time to make these calculations.

Then we need to put labels on each bucket sym­bol­iz­ing the tar­get date for fill­ing the buckets.

Are you ready to get started?”

The Bucket Strat­egy will help your clients to bet­ter under­stand the risks and will help them stay com­posed dur­ing dif­fi­cult mar­ket con­di­tions.  This will improve invest­ment per­for­mance and will reduce strains to your client rela­tion­ships caused by high lev­els of stress caused by uncertainty.

Bob Simp­son is Pres­i­dent of Syn­chronic­ity Per­for­mance Con­sul­tants.  Bob can be reached on his direct line at 905−502−0100, toll free at 866−646−6002 or by e-mail at bob.simpson@synchronicity.ca.

About Bob Simpson

Syn­chronic­ity Per­for­mance Con­sult­ing has been coach­ing finan­cial advi­sors since 1998.

Bob Simp­son, pres­i­dent and founder of Syn­chronic­ity has been involved, directly or indi­rectly in the finan­cial ser­vices indus­try since 1981. He has been a very suc­cess­ful finan­cial advi­sor with Nes­bitt Thom­son Inc., a major Cana­dian finan­cial insti­tu­tion. Between 1981 and 1989, he built a busi­ness with more than $120 mil­lion in assets under man­age­ment, was branch man­ager and SVP National Sales for Mid­land Wal­wyn and has been coach­ing finan­cial advi­sors since 1998.

You can fol­low Bob Simp­son via:


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Advisor Collaboration, Synchronicity | Comments Off