Archive for November, 2011

When Clients Make You Livid …

Wednesday, November 30th, 2011

Recently I read an arti­cle by Don Con­nelly, a long-time con­sul­tant to advi­sors in the US.

An advi­sor got a call from a sig­nif­i­cant client who was really upset about an invest­ment that hadn’t worked out. This client had a long his­tory of being emo­tional … on this call he got so worked up that he accused the advi­sor of hav­ing rec­om­mended that invest­ment because he got paid bet­ter on it than other alternatives.

The advi­sor got livid. He told the client that he didn’t like to have his pro­fes­sion­al­ism ques­tioned and they began yelling at each other over the phone. And ulti­mately they more or less ended up fir­ing each other.

Set­ting boundaries

Let’s be clear, I don’t think any­one should allow them­selves or their staff to be abused by clients. Unfor­tu­nately, there are some peo­ple out there who are bul­lies — that’s their nature and they are unlikely to change. And, if you find your­self deal­ing with some­one like that, I rec­om­mend you fig­ure out how to part com­pany with that client.

I’ve talked to advi­sors with large clients so abu­sive that every time they had to call them or meet with them they got a sick feel­ing. When they finally parted com­pany with them it was a huge load off their shoul­ders — as a result they became more pro­duc­tive in other parts of their prac­tice and almost always ended up replac­ing that rev­enue more quickly than they’d expected.

Count­ing to three

So we’re not talk­ing about clients who are in that cat­e­gory. But let’s sup­pose you have a client that may be emo­tional and some­times dif­fi­cult but who you ulti­mately want to hang on to.

And let’s sup­pose they say some­thing on the phone that upsets you, per­haps some­thing like: “I don’t know why I’m pay­ing all these fees for atro­cious performance.”

When a client says some­thing that pushes your but­tons, con­sider doing two things.

First, before respond­ing count qui­etly to three, so that you don’t say some­thing that you’ll regret.

And those three sec­onds of silence some­times do one other thing — some­times it lets clients know that they have crossed the line and they’ll apol­o­gize right then and there.

Estab­lish­ing a per­sonal connection

Sec­ond, If a client says “I don’t know why I’m pay­ing fees for this crappy per­for­mance”, I sug­gest you respond with some­thing like:

I can under­stand that you’re upset with your per­for­mance. This is some­thing we need to talk about fur­ther.  I won­der whether we could sched­ule a time to sit down in the next two or three weeks to dis­cuss this.”

That does a num­ber of things. First, it gives the client a chance to calm down.  Sec­ond, again in some cases it lets them know that they’ve crossed the line.

And finally, emo­tional con­ver­sa­tions are almost always bet­ter con­ducted face to face. So the chances are much bet­ter that by talk­ing about this in per­son you’ll have a bet­ter outcome.

Mak­ing meet­ings productive

Get­ting clients to open up about how they feel should be your top pri­or­ity… your main goal should be to ask ques­tions and get clients talk­ing, both so you can bet­ter under­stand where they’re com­ing from but also so they feel heard.

At the end of that con­ver­sa­tion, you might fin­ish with some­thing like:

“First of all, thanks for tak­ing the time to talk about the issues that are both­er­ing you. What else is on your mind that I should know about?”

After giv­ing clients a chance to respond, con­tinue on:

“For a part­ner­ship to work, it has to work for both of us.

So I guess I have two questions.

First of all, do we both want to con­tinue work­ing together?

And if we do, how do we ensure that we have a rela­tion­ship that is pro­duc­tive and that works for both of us?”

This con­ver­sa­tion won’t always be easy … but by being clear with clients that rela­tion­ships have to work for you as well as for them, you’ll sig­nif­i­cantly increase your chances of cre­at­ing a sus­tain­able, sat­is­fy­ing part­ner­ship with clients.


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Posted in Dan Richards | Comments Off


Turning Market Woes into Prospecting Opportunities

Wednesday, November 30th, 2011

The last few weeks have been the most volatile in mem­ory, bring­ing new mean­ing to the phrase “bungee markets”.

My recent posts have focused on the need for proac­tive com­mu­ni­ca­tion with clients.

In the per­fect world, you would have had con­ser­v­a­tive port­fo­lios with large cash bal­ances going into the last twelve months. Real­is­ti­cally, few advi­sors can hon­estly make that claim — but that doesn’t mean you don’t have the oppor­tu­nity to gain new clients in the cur­rent mar­ket conditions.

Ear­lier this week, I got a call from an advi­sor who had dili­gently con­tacted clients over the sum­mer — since last spring he’s made face to face and tele­phone meet­ings with all his key clients a pri­or­ity. He’s also sent out let­ters and emails, orga­nized two con­fer­ence calls and hosted lun­cheon and evening ses­sions for clients.

His ques­tion: In addi­tion to focus­ing on talk­ing to key clients through the mar­ket tur­moil, what can he do to attract new clients?

His­tory shows more clients move in bad mar­kets rather than good ones. If you’re in a sit­u­a­tion sim­i­lar to this advi­sor, where you’ve done most of the right things over the past while, you have a unique oppor­tu­nity to cap­i­tal­ize on the time you’ve invested by lever­ag­ing your client com­mu­ni­ca­tion to talk to prospects.

Clearly, your pri­mary focus these days should be on exist­ing clients. That said, once you’ve done a solid job with the peo­ple you’re work­ing with right now, the best use of the last hour or two in a week won’t nec­es­sar­ily be more con­tact to exist­ing clients.

Instead, direct that time against prospects — we know that many clients aren’t sat­is­fied with the con­tact from their advi­sors through recent mar­ket events. In light of that, con­sider two strate­gies — one focused on exist­ing clients, the sec­ond on com­mu­ni­cat­ing directly with prospects.

Exist­ing clients

Refer­rals con­tinue to be key in attract­ing new clients. At the end of a con­ver­sa­tion with clients, you could say: “Given the chal­leng­ing mar­kets over the last while, talk­ing to clients like you has been my first pri­or­ity. How do you feel about the level of com­mu­ni­ca­tion you’ve received from me over the past while?”

Assum­ing you get a pos­i­tive response con­tinue: “I’m glad you feel good about the con­tact, even if mar­kets haven’t been coop­er­at­ing through this. Of late, there has been lots of media cov­er­age about investors who haven’t heard from their advi­sors and are think­ing about mak­ing a change as a result. Given the work I’ve done, I’m hop­ing to have the oppor­tu­nity to talk to some of those people.”

How you con­tinue at that point depends on what you’ve done to stay in front of clients — for example:

Can you think of one or two friends or col­leagues at work who might be inter­ested in receiv­ing the last mar­ket com­men­tary I sent you?”

Are there one or two peo­ple you work with who might be inter­ested in com­ing along to the lun­cheon ses­sion at my office you’re going to be attend­ing next week?”

Can you think of one of your friends who might be inter­ested in lis­ten­ing to the con­fer­ence call we con­ducted last week”

Do you know one per­son in par­tic­u­lar who might be inter­ested in talk­ing to me, per­haps some­one who has com­plained to you about lack of con­tact from their advisor?”

Or if you’re look­ing for a more low key approach, sim­ply say:

Based on the team I have in place, over the next year I have capac­ity for ten to fif­teen addi­tional clients. Should you be talk­ing to a friend or col­league in the next while who is unhappy with their advi­sor and think­ing about mak­ing a change, I would be happy to sit down with them and dis­cuss their situation.”

While less likely to prompt an imme­di­ate response, at least this con­ver­sa­tion plants a seed in your client’s mind.

Note that hav­ing these con­ver­sa­tions entails addi­tional min­utes at the end of a meet­ing — you can get a big return for a small invest­ment of time.

Prospects

While it’s cer­tainly pos­si­ble to ini­ti­ate a con­ver­sa­tion with a prospec­tive client from a stand­ing start, the odds of suc­cess are much bet­ter if you’ve built cred­i­bil­ity and famil­iar­ity with a prospect over the past months or years.

If you’re talked to some­one in the past, now is the time to cap­i­tal­ize on the things you’ve done to pro­vide direc­tion and guid­ance to clients over the recent while.

Call up prospects you’ve been cul­ti­vat­ing and say some­thing like:

In light of recent mar­ket events, I’m call­ing to see if you’re inter­ested in sit­ting down for 20 to 30 min­utes to do two things.

First, I’d like to quickly take you through the advice I’ve given to clients over the past while through meet­ings, phone calls and my writ­ten mar­ket reviews (adding in any­thing else you’ve done).

And sec­ond, if you’re inter­ested, I’d be happy to talk about your own sit­u­a­tion and per­haps pro­vide you with a sec­ond opin­ion on how your port­fo­lio is posi­tioned given the cur­rent mar­ket cir­cum­stances and prospects for the period ahead.”

Even if the prospect doesn’t want to meet, you can still advance your cause by offer­ing access to the mate­r­ial you’ve pro­vided to your clients.

Not every prospec­tive client will have a pos­i­tive response to this over­ture and those who do respond pos­i­tively may take a while to become clients — but by hav­ing these con­ver­sa­tions you will plant seeds that will pay div­i­dends in future.


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in My Practice | Comments Off


The Benefits Of Being In The Learning Mode: Can You Hear Your Clients?

Wednesday, November 30th, 2011

The Ben­e­fits Of Being In The Learn­ing Mode: Can you hear your clients?

by Stephen Wershing

If you want greater share of wal­let and more refer­rals, peri­od­i­cally you need to be lis­ten­ing and act­ing on feed­back. When it is time to receive that feed­back, it is crit­i­cal that you be in the “learn­ing mode”. When I facil­i­tate client advi­sory boards, I coach advi­sors to have a Zen mind. I encour­age them to be in the state of open­ness. It is a lit­tle like prac­tic­ing a form of med­i­ta­tion called mind­ful­ness – accept ideas as they arrive, exam­ine them with­out judg­ment, per­haps set them aside for fur­ther con­sid­er­a­tion, and move onto the next suggestion.

Get­ting into and stay­ing in the learn­ing mode is hard. As humans, we have a reflex­ive ten­dency to respond to ques­tions with answers. Com­pound­ing that, we are in the busi­ness of pro­vid­ing answers. It is our job to share our exper­tise and tell peo­ple what to do. There are times, how­ever, when we need to switch roles and get feed­back on what we’re doing. If we want to improve our prac­tices, we need our clients’ guid­ance. And in that sit­u­a­tion, answer­ing does not help. What do you learn when you answer? Noth­ing. How do you get bet­ter when you answer? You don’t.

Always seek value in these inter­ac­tions. Ask what can I learn from this client? What can I learn from this sit­u­a­tion? Look for ques­tions to ask. If you are asked a ques­tion, try fol­low­ing the answer with another ques­tion. If pos­si­ble, ask a ques­tion instead of answer­ing. Here are some examples:

Before I answer that, what about this is impor­tant to you?

What would it mean to you if I could do that?

What would you say is the biggest con­cern you have that is prompt­ing that ques­tion? (Which is a less threat­en­ing way of ask­ing “why do you ask?”).

The need to dis­cuss this was high­lighted by a con­ver­sa­tion I had with an advi­sor yes­ter­day. We were dis­cussing the agenda for his first client advi­sory board meet­ing. He said “I’m not sure what to put on the agenda, I don’t know what they want to hear about.” My response was that a meet­ing like this was not about what they wanted to hear, it is about what they have to say.

There is a time to answer. When it is a time to lis­ten and the clients turn to speak, the longer you can stay in the learn­ing mode, the more your clients will tell you how to do more busi­ness with them and how you can attract more clients like them.


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in My Practice | Comments Off


To Connect, Communicate Solutions, NOT Methods

Wednesday, November 30th, 2011

Peo­ple care less about what you do and more about what they get.

When I asked advi­sors what they do, or what value they rep­re­sent, too many describe the process they uti­lize and not enough describe solu­tion they deliver. Peo­ple won’t send you a refer­ral because you have a cus­tomized finan­cial plan­ning process and eval­u­ate indi­vid­ual goals and gen­er­ate rec­om­men­da­tions tai­lored to client spe­cific needs, and they won’t send you a refer­ral because you care­fully mon­i­tor rela­tion­ships between mar­kets and rebal­ance port­fo­lios based on pro­pri­etary pro­to­cols. They will pro­vide a refer­ral beause you pro­vide a solu­tion to a prob­lem their friend has. Peo­ple care less about what you do and more about what they get.

I believe the most pow­er­ful descrip­tions of the value advi­sors offer encap­su­late the ben­e­fit a tar­get prospect real­izes by work­ing with them. This requires, first, that you have a prac­ti­cal and well defined tar­get mar­ket, but that’s another post. Con­sider describ­ing what you do worded as a solu­tion from the client’s point of view. Com­plete this sen­tence “Peo­ple like [describe tar­get prospect] come to me for [solu­tion that tar­get mar­ket requires]. Con­sider these possibilities:

Cor­po­rate exec­u­tives fac­ing retire­ment in the next three years come to me because I show them the right choice on their retire­ment plan distributions.

Sin­gle pro­fes­sional moth­ers come to me to learn how to bal­ance the demands of rais­ing kids with the abil­ity to afford college.

Peo­ple who have saved enough to take care of them­selves and want to use their sav­ings to leave a mark on the world come to us to plan their legacy.

You can teach your clients state­ments of value like these, and they will repeat them to oth­ers when pro­vid­ing you a referral.

Don’t worry about answer­ing the ques­tion “What do you do” with a sen­tence that starts out by describ­ing your tar­get client. You may think the per­son who asked you the ques­tion wants you to be the sub­ject of the sen­tence, but you can much more effec­tively get their atten­tion by describ­ing the per­son you spe­cial­ize in – espe­cially if it is them.

When I ask advi­sors what they do, most often I hear ver­sions of “I help peo­ple reach their finan­cial goals” or “I man­age people’s port­fo­lios to help reduce risk.”  Or “I give peo­ple peace of mind”. These are usu­ally too gen­eral to be use­ful. And the big­ger prob­lem is that I don’t think of my prob­lems in those terms. I have just started a new busi­ness with one child in col­lege, and am newly mar­ried, work­ing on con­sol­i­dat­ing two house­holds and have a three-year-old in the house for the first time in 14 years. You are NOT going to give me peace of mind.

Peo­ple will come to get a solu­tion, not to get a process. And peo­ple will remem­ber to refer you because a friend men­tions a prob­lem that your client can plug your solu­tion into, not because they like your process or because you have pro­vided them returns to keep up with the mar­ket (even if it’s with lower volatility).

If you stand for process you are a tech­ni­cian. If you rep­re­sent a solu­tion, you will attract clients and refer­rals who need a prob­lem solved.


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in My Practice | Comments Off


Traps that Chew Up Your Day

Wednesday, November 30th, 2011

Time has always been the scarcest resource for suc­cess­ful finan­cial advi­sors. But given all the demands today, it’s essen­tial that advi­sors make max­i­mum use of their workday.

Three Com­mon traps

There are three com­mon traps for advi­sors when it comes to how they spend their day.

Trap one: Being reactive

The first big trap is not being proac­tive in man­ag­ing time. For many advi­sors, rather than man­ag­ing their day, their day man­ages them — as a result advi­sors are spend­ing most of their time react­ing to events.

Trap two: How you use your time

Sec­ond is fail­ing to focus on the high­est and best uses of time.

Quite sim­ply, too many advi­sors get bogged down in stuff that is low value and don’t spend enough time on their high­est value activities.

Those high value activ­i­ties will vary with the advisor.

Typ­i­cally, advi­sors need to spend some time on team man­age­ment and com­mu­ni­ca­tion, on port­fo­lio research, on deal­ing with admin and client ser­vice issues and on con­tin­u­ing education.

But gen­er­ally, these aren’t the activ­i­ties dri­ving the suc­cess of a business.

Rather the things that make advi­sors excel typ­i­cally fall into two cat­e­gories — first, com­mu­ni­cat­ing with exist­ing clients and sec­ond, either talk­ing to prospec­tive clients or doing things that will facil­i­tate talk­ing to prospec­tive clients.

Trap three: No con­sis­tent routine

The third trap is not hav­ing a con­sis­tent rou­tine for each day. With­out a con­sis­tent rou­tine, it’s all too easy to get side­tracked and to have your day get away from you.

How advi­sors are spend­ing their time now

Cerulli Asso­ciates is a lead­ing firm based in Boston spe­cial­iz­ing in research for the finan­cial indus­try.

Late last year, they pub­lished a sur­vey on how advi­sors spent their time in 2009.

What Cerulli found was that the aver­age advi­sor spent 27% of their day deal­ing with exist­ing clients and 16% with prospec­tive clients.

So that was just over 40% spent on these high­est value activ­i­ties, which of course left almost 60% spent on lower value activities.

These lower value activ­i­ties included 11% of advi­sors’ time on client ser­vice issues and then between 7 and 10% of their day in five other areas, includ­ing research and due dili­gence, trad­ing and asset man­age­ment, office admin­is­tra­tion, train­ing and pro­fes­sional devel­op­ment and compliance.

I was struck by two things in particular.

First, the time spent on research and due dili­gence and trad­ing and asset man­age­ment aver­aged about 17% — for some advi­sors it was much more, for oth­ers much less.

Advi­sors have to take a very hard look at their value propo­si­tion and where they bring unique value to clients — and if it’s not related to the invest­ment selec­tion process, then take a very hard look at how much time they’re spend­ing in this area.

Sec­ond, I was also sur­prised by the 11% of the aver­age advisor’s week spent on client ser­vice related issue — that’s four hours a week, almost 200 a year.

In some cases, advi­sors have no choice but to get involved but as much as pos­si­ble you need to del­e­gate lower value activ­i­ties, even if it ini­tially takes a bit of extra time to explain something.

Putting a value on your time

Let’s sup­pose you buy into the notion that you need to del­e­gate every­thing you can out­side of high value activities.

As part of that, you should put a value on your time, say $40 or $50 an hour or per­haps more — and using that as a guide­line for decid­ing whether to do some­thing your­self or to hire some­one to do it.

If I can hire some­one for $12 or $15 an hour to do fil­ing, even it takes them twice as long as it does me, if my hourly rate is $40 or $50, it still makes sense to do this.

Improv­ing the return on your day

A good place to start is by get­ting a han­dle on where you spend your time currently.

For one week, track how you’re spend­ing your time in 15 or 30 minute incre­ments, putting that time block into com­mon categories.

Here’s one pos­si­ble list of com­mon activ­i­ties to assign each time block to:

Clients

  • Prepa­ra­tion for meet­ings or calls
  • Meet­ings (includ­ing travel)
  • Phone calls
  • Client ser­vice issues
  • Prepar­ing for and con­duct­ing client sem­i­nars and workshops
  • Other client activity

Prospects

  • Prepa­ra­tion for meet­ings or calls
  • Meet­ings with prospects
  • Phone calls with prospects
  • Prepar­ing and con­duct­ing prospect sem­i­nars and workshops
  • Pro­file build­ing activity
  • Vol­un­teer activity
  • Other prospect activity

Office and admin

  • Plan­ning weekly and daily schedule
  • For­mal team meetings
  • Infor­mal team communication
  • Office admin
  • Head office calls and meetings
  • Other office activity

Com­pli­ance

  • Research and pro­fes­sional development
  • Daily read­ing
  • Attend­ing man­ager pre­sen­ta­tions / roadshows
  • Edu­ca­tion sessions
  • Other read­ing and prof development

Other

Once you’ve done that, you need to sum­ma­rize the results and ask if this is con­sis­tent with focus­ing on the high­est and best uses of your time.

If not, con­sider block­ing out time in your cal­en­dar for high pri­or­ity activ­i­ties, whether it be call­ing clients you haven’t spo­ken with for awhile or con­tact­ing a prospect that you’re over­due to talk with.

Quite sim­ply, if you block out time for them in your cal­en­dar, these activ­i­ties are much more likely to happen.

In the process, you’ll see a dra­matic increase in the return from the time you spend on your business.

 


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Dan Richards | Comments Off


The Single Best Way to Start a Client Meeting

Wednesday, November 30th, 2011

What does it take for a meet­ing with a key client to be successful?

Answer­ing that ques­tion requires you to first quan­tify how you mea­sure success.

Here are three alter­na­tive definitions:

  • 1. First and fore­most, did the clients agree to move for­ward on at least one thing that will advance their agenda , mov­ing them towards their goals and leav­ing them bet­ter positioned?
  • 2. Did the clients agree to move for­ward on at least one item that that will advance your agenda and leave you bet­ter off?

The list of pos­si­ble items here is lengthy, for example:

  • A shift in your com­pen­sa­tion model
  • Con­sol­i­dat­ing accounts they have elsewhere
  • Agree­ing to deal with one of your team mem­bers on day to day issues instead of call­ing you
  • Open­ing the door to talk­ing about needs that you’re not deal­ing with cur­rently (so insur­ance if you only have their invest­ments, invest­ments if you only have their insurance)
  • Find­ing a way to get to know their kids bet­ter and poten­tially to begin work­ing with their children
  • Intro­duc­tions to fam­ily mem­bers or their accountant
  • Refer­rals to col­leagues at work
  • 3. In the process, was your bond with these clients strength­ened? Did they walk away feel­ing bet­ter about your depth of knowl­edge and pro­fes­sion­al­ism and the extent to which you truly care about their long term suc­cess, beyond the rev­enue you gen­er­ate from their account? Did they leave say­ing to them­selves: “Am I ever glad that Dan’s my finan­cial advisor”

Shap­ing your conversation

I’m going to sug­gest that depend­ing on the cir­cum­stances, a meet­ing can be suc­cess­ful with­out spe­cific actions taken to advance your clients’ agenda or your agenda, but it’s impos­si­ble to have a truly suc­cess­ful meet­ing unless clients walk away feel­ing bet­ter about your rela­tion­ship. Even in tough mar­kets like we saw dur­ing the global finan­cial cri­sis, if clients don’t walk out of a meet­ing more con­fi­dent than they felt when they walked in, the meet­ing wasn’t a success.

I recently got a call from an advi­sor who’d attended one of my work­shops about a year ago and who’s a reg­u­lar reader of these articles.

Over the past year, she’s imple­mented a num­ber of ideas and feels that her meet­ings are much more pro­duc­tive as a result:

  • 1. Before call­ing a client to sched­ule a meet­ing, she reviews her files and writes down her goals for the meet­ing, one or two things she hopes to achieve that will leave the clients bet­ter off and advance their agenda and also one thing that will leave her bet­ter off, advanc­ing her agenda.

  • 2. When set­ting up the meet­ing, she starts by ask­ing clients what ques­tions they’d like to cover, then adds her own items to deal with (often emerg­ing from those goals she’s writ­ten down) and from that cre­ates an agenda, which she emails to clients before­hand and which is tabled at the start of the meeting.

I encour­age advi­sors to leave the line beside the first item blank and to say “You’ll note that he first item on the agenda is blank. That’s for any ques­tions that have come up since we set the meet­ing up or any­thing else that you’d like to talk about that’s not on the agenda.”

  • 3. In devel­op­ing the meet­ing agenda, she fac­tors in some of the research I’ve writ­ten about on the “peak-end effect”. This research sug­gests that what shapes client rec­ol­lec­tions of any expe­ri­ence the most are the “peaks” — the highs and the lows — and what hap­pens at the very end. As a result, she struc­tures the agenda to be sure to end on a high note.

“What should I know about?”

This advi­sor has also incor­po­rated the idea of leav­ing the first agenda item blank, but after ask­ing clients about what else they’d like to dis­cuss that’s not on the agenda, she’s added another ques­tion of her own.

“At that point, I ask clients what’s hap­pened in their lives since we last met that I should know about, whether good or bad.

I have about 150 client meet­ings a year. About 95% of the time I don’t hear any­thing new or I hear great news about pro­mo­tions or buy­ing a vaca­tion home or their kids get­ting uni­ver­sity schol­ar­ships or per­haps expect­ing chil­dren them­selves. In those cases, we con­tinue on with the meet­ing, unless of course their good news has finan­cial impli­ca­tions we need to discuss.

Every cou­ple of months, though, the answer causes our meet­ing to move in an entirely dif­fer­ent direc­tion … I hear about health or work issues with them or fam­ily mem­bers or kids strug­gling with school or careers. Some­times their issues have spe­cific finan­cial con­se­quences that we talk about. Often though, I’m just there to lis­ten and to empathize … it’s amaz­ing how often clients tell me they have no one to talk to about these issues.

At times, that con­ver­sa­tion ends up con­sum­ing our whole meet­ing and we resched­ule. Occa­sion­ally I’m able to point to clients or peo­ple I know who’ve run into an issue sim­i­lar to theirs and ask if they’d like me to find out whether that other per­son would be will­ing to talk about their expe­ri­ence. And where clients are really strug­gling and need more help, I have a cou­ple of psy­chol­o­gists who I refer peo­ple to.

I know this won’t be every advisor’s cup of tea … most of the guys in my branch really don’t want to get into the soft stuff with clients.

But for me, there are four ben­e­fits to start­ing off meet­ings with that ques­tion — ‘What’s hap­pened in your lives since we last met that I should know about, whether good or bad?’

First, I think it sends a pos­i­tive sig­nal about my con­cern for every­thing going on in my clients’ lives.

Sec­ond, it helps me do my job bet­ter, by ensur­ing that plans reflect clients’ cur­rent circumstances.

Third, where clients have pos­i­tive things hap­pen­ing in their lives, which is most of the time, I’m able to con­grat­u­late them and talk about their good news a bit, I find that estab­lishes a pos­i­tive tone.

And finally, where clients are deal­ing with tough issues, I think it’s part of my role as their finan­cial advi­sor to make sure I know about that and to sup­port them as much as I can.

This advi­sor is right when she says that this approach won’t be a fit for every advi­sor. But it’s still worth think­ing about how you’re going to begin client meet­ings to max­i­mize the chances of a suc­cess­ful out­come, how­ever it is that you define suc­cess. And per­haps this advi­sor will inspire you to apply your own cre­ativ­ity on the ques­tion of the best way to start client meetings.


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Dan Richards | Comments Off


Working Smart vs Working Hard: Your Most Important Resolution for 2012

Wednesday, November 30th, 2011

There are lots of res­o­lu­tions advi­sors could make in 2012. But here’s the one that for many advi­sors could have the high­est pay­off – and that’s to work smarter this year, by build­ing reg­u­lar think­ing time into your business.<br>

We’ve all become incred­i­bly busy with more demand­ing clients and an always-on world of email and black­berry. As a result, most advi­sors are work­ing hard but they aren’t nec­es­sar­ily work­ing smart. And the only way to ensure you’re work­ing smart is to con­sis­tently step back and take a bit of time to think hard about your business.

Quar­terly think­ing time

This process starts by hav­ing writ­ten goals in place for the next three to five years and a writ­ten plan of action for the year ahead on how you’re going to achieve those goals. That writ­ten 12 month plan is a good start­ing point but that’s all it is unless you sched­ule reg­u­lar time into your rou­tine to review, update and mod­ify that plan.

This should hap­pen at four lev­els – quar­terly, monthly, weekly and daily.

For your quar­terly think­ing time, you should sit down for half a day with your team or two or three other advi­sors that you respect and trust.

And in that half a day, you ask your­self a num­ber of key ques­tions:

What were my goals for the last quar­ter and how did I do against those goals?

What worked in the last quar­ter, what didn’t and what can I learn from the last quar­ter? In other words what I am I going to do dif­fer­ently in the next three months based on what hap­pened in the last three months?

And finally, what are my goals for the next quarter?

Monthly, weekly … and daily

For your monthly think­ing time, you go through exactly the same review process … except you do it more briefly, tak­ing an hour or so rather than half a day. But you ask your­self the same fun­da­men­tal ques­tions, how am I doing against my goals, what’s worked and what hasn’t , what am I going to do dif­fer­ently next month as a result.

For your weekly think­ing time, you’re look­ing at ten min­utes to review with your team what hap­pened last week, again what worked, what didn’t , what can we learn from this.

A few years back I talked to a very suc­cess­ful advi­sor who for thirty years had taken ten min­utes every Sun­day night at 9 o’clock to review all his meet­ings in the week that had just passed and asked him­self what he needed to do dif­fer­ently based on that – and attrib­uted much of his suc­cess to that process.

Finally, for your daily think­ing time I sug­gest advi­sors either end each day or start each day by tak­ing two or three min­utes and ask­ing one key ques­tion – what can I learn from the day that just passed.

And then write down the answer.


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in My Practice | Comments Off


Communicate with Confidence

Wednesday, November 23rd, 2011

1. Open effec­tively. The vast major­ity of sales pro­pos­als start with infor­ma­tion about the seller’s com­pany. I have never fig­ured out the ratio­nale of this approach. Your prospect doesn’t care about you or your com­pany. They don’t want to know how long you have been in busi­ness, what awards you have won, or what other com­pa­nies you have worked with. Effec­tive pro­pos­als always high­light the prob­lem that the prospect is fac­ing and the impact that prob­lem has on their busi­ness. And they do this early. Not on page two, three or nine. On the first page. If you feel oblig­ated to include this type of infor­ma­tion place it near the end of the proposal.

2. Address their sit­u­a­tion early. An approach that I have found very effec­tive is to begin with a one para­graph sum­mary of my prospect’s sit­u­a­tion fol­lowed by the key objec­tives they want to achieve. This demon­strates that you have a good under­stand­ing of your prospect’s prob­lems and con­cerns. I like to state the objec­tives in bullet-point form because it is eas­ier to read and absorb.

3. Show the value. This does not mean expand­ing at great length about your solu­tion. Instead, it requires that you iden­tify exactly how your prospect will ben­e­fit by imple­ment­ing your solu­tion. A tech­nique I learned many years ago is to include sev­eral bul­let points with each point stat­ing a sep­a­rate value proposition.

4. Avoid corporate-speak or mar­ket­ing mumbo-jumbo. The best pro­pos­als are writ­ten in plain, easy-to-understand lan­guage. Many sales peo­ple (and mar­ket­ing depart­ments) think that it is impor­tant to use ten dol­lar words when a sim­ple word would suf­fice. Never, ever use ter­mi­nol­ogy that might be dif­fi­cult to under­stand. Although this is a sim­ple con­cept, too many sales peo­ple include word­ing or tech­ni­cal infor­ma­tion that just isn’t nec­es­sary. I learned this les­son when I sub­mit­ted my first pro­posal many years ago. After earn­ing the busi­ness I asked my client why they chose me and she said, “Your pro­posal was easy to understand.”

5. Keep it brief. I once read a pro­posal for a sales train­ing pro­gram that spanned 24 pages. Deci­sion mak­ers are far too busy to read a long pro­posal. I under­stand that some pro­pos­als require a lot of infor­ma­tion and detail, espe­cially if you are rec­om­mend­ing a com­plex solu­tion. How­ever, the longer your pro­posal the more likely it is that your prospect will skim through it and flip ahead to the invest­ment. It is much more effec­tive to write a short, con­cise pro­posal and pro­vide back-up infor­ma­tion if needed.

6. Avoid the word “I” or “we”. The more times these two words show up in your pro­posal the more evi­dent it appears that the pro­posal is about you, not about your prospect or their busi­ness or com­pany. This also includes men­tion­ing your com­pany name. Keep your pro­posal focused on your prospect and use the word “you”.

7. Use titles or head­ings. This is par­tic­u­larly impor­tant if your pro­posal is rel­a­tively long although it is an effec­tive approach with short pro­pos­als too. Head­ings make it easy for your prospect to find key infor­ma­tion. Head­ing also break up the page and make your pro­posal eas­ier to read.

8. Include at least one tes­ti­mo­nial. Tes­ti­mo­ni­als remain one of the most effec­tive sales weapons and you need to incor­po­rate them into your pro­pos­als. I like to add these in my P.S. after my sig­na­ture although I know peo­ple who include sev­eral tes­ti­mo­ni­als through­out their proposals.

9. Include a sum­mary. Many peo­ple will skip the details of your pro­posal and flip to the last page. Effec­tive pro­pos­als include a bullet-point sum­mary of the ser­vices you will pro­vide to your prospect.

10. End with a call to action. I used to close my pro­pos­als with, “If you require any addi­tional infor­ma­tion please feel free to con­tact me.” Bor­ing! Tell the prospect what you want them to do next. By the way, the next steps should ALWAYS be dis­cussed BEFORE you write your proposal.

The pur­pose of a pro­posal is to demon­strate that you and your com­pany have the best solu­tion for the prospect’s prob­lem. Apply the con­cepts that were men­tioned in this arti­cle and stand out from your competition.

Kel­ley Robert­son helps sales pro­fes­sion­als and busi­nesses dis­cover new tech­niques to improve their sales and prof­its. Learn more at www​.Kel​ley​Robert​son​.com.


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in My Practice | Comments Off


Dan Ariely — The Upside Of Irrationality

Wednesday, November 23rd, 2011

Make sure you watch this. Dan Ariely dis­cusses the virtue of irra­tional­ity, par­tic­u­larly the man­ner in which our irra­tional­ity serves us when it comes to the trust gap.

Dan Ariely and Dan Richards carry on a fas­ci­nat­ing dis­cus­sion about human nature that is mate­r­ial to under­stand­ing the com­plex­ity of all deci­sion making.


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , ,
Posted in Dan Richards | Comments Off