Archive for May 25th, 2011

You Missed a Great Conference!

Wednesday, May 25th, 2011

The CIFPs 8th National Con­fer­ence Review

By Marc Lam­on­tagne, CFP, R.F.P, FMA

This is my sec­ond con­sec­u­tive year attend­ing this con­fer­ence and once again the agenda was PACKED. Each day began about 7:30 am and typ­i­cally went to 6:00 pm, with din­ner start­ing pronto at 6:30. You clearly earn your CE cred­its and receive your money’s worth at this conference.

The agenda was a smor­gas­bord; enough to quench the thirst for nov­elty of 500 to 600 atten­dees. The high­light was undoubt­edly Her­mann F. Leinin­gen with RBC Global Asset Man­age­ment. Leinin­gen was very funny, and he man­aged to walk the audi­ence through sev­eral com­plex eco­nomic sce­nar­ios and sus­tain their interest!

Take away: Expect U.S. inter­est rates to stay low for at least the next nine months or until there is a jobs recov­ery, stocks are still trad­ing at the lower end of the band due to con­tin­ued global eco­nomic uncer­tainty, and the demand for oil from China and India has barely scratched the surface.

Like any con­fer­ence there were a few mutual fund com­pany “talk­ing heads,” although the more inter­est­ing mate­r­ial came from indus­try par­tic­i­pants such as Cary List, Pres­i­dent and CEO of the Finan­cial Plan­ners Stan­dards Coun­cil. List pre­sented some of the find­ings of their recent con­sumer sur­vey on the ben­e­fits of finan­cial plan­ning. This is news that all CFP pro­fes­sion­als will want to share with their clients and prospects. Shawn Bray­man, Pres­i­dent of Plan­Plus, offered us an overview of the top aca­d­e­mic and indus­try research in the field of finan­cial plan­ning. How­ever, he had so many fas­ci­nat­ing papers to dis­cuss, it was unfor­tu­nate he had only an hour to cover his mate­r­ial.  And yours truly gave a short pre­sen­ta­tion on the recent 2010 Advi­sor Sur­vey Report, con­clud­ing that the deliv­ery of finan­cial advice is not that dif­fer­ent between fee and com­mis­sion models.

Susan Wol­burg Jenah, Pres­i­dent & CEO of IIROC, pro­vided an update on the Client Rela­tion­ship Model (CRM) pro­pos­als that will impose greater dis­clo­sure on the indus­try in order to increase investor pro­tec­tion. How­ever, the CRM has dragged on for so long and mor­phed so many times, it is hard to believe it will ever mate­ri­al­ize. Asked by an attendee how the devel­op­ments on com­pen­sa­tion in the U.K. and Aus­tralia might affect us here, Wol­burg Jenah said that IIROC was keep­ing a close eye on devel­op­ments that could poten­tially influ­ence com­pen­sa­tion mod­els in Canada, although it is prefer­able that indus­try par­tic­i­pants “vol­un­tar­ily” assess how to bet­ter align the inter­ests of clients and advisors.

The final day ended at noon, but the morn­ing still had sev­eral excel­lent speak­ers such as Dr. Dale Orr, Jamie Golombek, and Kevin O’Brien, who filled the morn­ing with great nuggets of wisdom.

Take away: Dr. Orr from Eco­nomic Insight pro­vided his short-term pre­dic­tions for Canada’s econ­omy: neg­li­gi­ble infla­tion, the dol­lar will trade close to par or maybe even higher if the price of oil increases, short-term rates will be higher in Canada than the U.S. (again putting upward pres­sure on our dol­lar), expect the Bank of Canada pol­icy rate to increase by 25 basis-points at every fixed announce­ment date for the next three years until it reaches the tar­get of 4% to 4.5%, and finally, don’t expect to see a bal­anced fed­eral bud­get until 2014–2015.

Jamie Golombek from CIBC Pri­vate Wealth Man­age­ment, who always stages a grand show, regaled the audi­ence with sto­ries of cre­ative bro­kers who sup­pos­edly found loop­holes in the TFSA con­tri­bu­tion rules. He also offered sev­eral use­ful tax strate­gies, updates, and sug­ges­tions on advis­ing your clients based on recent tax court decisions.

Take away: Advi­sors should be rec­om­mend­ing to almost every client that they top up their TFSA con­tri­bu­tion room prior to mak­ing RRSP contributions.

And finally, cer­ti­fied finan­cial plan­ner Kevin O’Brien from Kevin O’Brien & Asso­ciates told the audi­ence his some­times funny, some­times heart­felt story of man­ag­ing his parent’s messy estate before he became an advi­sor. It affected his cur­rent approach to estate plan­ning so much that he pub­lished his story for other advi­sors to read in Where There’s a Will….There’s a Way.

Over­all, it was an excel­lent con­fer­ence, and I would highly rec­om­mend attend­ing CIFP 2011 to be held in Ottawa from June 5 to 8. Media arti­cles from some of the pre­sen­ta­tions are avail­able on the CIFP website.

Fall Con­fer­ence Alert!

There are two first-rate con­fer­ences com­ing up in the fall that I will attend and rec­om­mend as well worth the investment.

The first is the IAFP Annual Sym­po­sium in Banff from Sep­tem­ber 23 to 25, 2010. This one is par­tic­u­larly enjoy­able; it is more sym­po­sium than con­fer­ence because it is anchored by a sin­gle finan­cial plan­ning case study. All speak­ers are required to ref­er­ence this case study in their pre­sen­ta­tions and are encour­aged to pub­lish papers from their spe­cialty per­spec­tive. This cer­tainly elim­i­nates the dis­ori­en­ta­tion one can some­times feel lis­ten­ing to mul­ti­ple talk­ing heads on sev­eral diverse sub­jects at other con­fer­ences. This year the case study is about a retir­ing busi­ness owner who also hap­pens to be a finan­cial plan­ner (is this a coin­ci­dence?). The sym­po­sium cul­mi­nates with a half-day dis­cus­sion on the case study by the 125+ attendees.

The sec­ond is the Knowl­edge Bureau’s (KB) Dis­tin­guished Advi­sor Con­fer­ence in Orlando from Novem­ber 14 to 17, 2010. Knowl­edge Bureau fac­ulty speak­ers such as Richard Croft and Doug Nel­son are top notch and KB Pres­i­dent Eve­lyn Jacks obvi­ously used her time wisely recruit­ing the likes of Don Stew­art, CEO Sun Life Finan­cial, while she was a fel­low mem­ber of the Fed­eral Task Force on Finan­cial Lit­er­acy. The other com­pelling rea­son to attend is this: each day ends at the utterly civ­i­lized time of 1:30 pm, giv­ing atten­dees ample time to enjoy the sun and nearby ameni­ties with col­leagues and family.

Marc Lam­on­tagne, CFP, R.F.P., FMA is a fee-based finan­cial plan­ner with Ryan Lam­on­tagne Inc., fee-model prac­tice man­age­ment trainer, and author of To Fee or Not to Fee II — How to design a fee finan­cial advi­sory prac­tice.  www​.tofee​ornot​tofee​.com


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in My Practice | Comments Off


Structuring Your Day For Maximum Productivity

Wednesday, May 25th, 2011

Dan Richards, Strategic ImperativesTwo things go into mak­ing our days pro­duc­tive — the first is what we do and the sec­ond is how we do it.

In recent con­ver­sa­tions with advi­sors, a num­ber have begun using a sim­ple idea to dra­mat­i­cally increase the return they get on their day, by ensur­ing that they’re focus­ing on high return activities.The first thing to mak­ing your time in the office pro­duc­tive is being inten­tional, step­ping back at the start of the week and ask­ing what is the high­est and best use of this week as a whole and each day within this week.

I’ve worked with some advi­sors recently who have begun spend­ing 15 or 20 inutes plan­ning the week ahead, iden­ti­fy­ing the biggest pri­or­i­ties. Some do this end of the day Fri­day, oth­ers on Sat­ur­day or Sunday.

Just by doing that, advi­sors tell me that they find their week has greater focus.

The other key to pro­duc­tiv­ity is build­ing con­sis­tent rou­tines into your sched­ule, using the tried and true approach of time blocking.

Rou­tine sim­pli­fies our lives — with­out rou­tine, we’d all have to make so many indi­vid­ual deci­sions we’d spend most of our time decid­ing what to do rather than doing it.

Some of the most suc­cess­ful advi­sors I know have very con­sis­tent rou­tines. Each day looks pretty much the same — as long as the rou­tine is one that sup­ports the right activ­ity, it can boost our pro­duc­tiv­ity dramatically.

For many advi­sors, the best way to estab­lish rou­tine in your day is via time block­ing, estab­lish­ing time in your cal­en­dar for key activities.

Sup­pose you say that you want to meet with your assis­tant Scott on Mon­day morn­ing to lay out the week ahead. You can say to your­self — I need to talk to Scott when we both get in. Or you can say to Scott — “let’s book a 15 appoint­ment for 8:30 every Mon­day morn­ing and build it into our routines.”

Or per­haps you decide you need to spend at least three hours a week talk­ing to prospects. To make that hap­pen, you can try to find time dur­ing the week as it is avail­able — or you can  book off an appoint­ment at 10 on Mon­day, Wednes­day and Fri­day, focused on pick­ing up the phone and call­ing prospects.

Here’s another exam­ple. One of the advi­sors who par­tic­i­pated in the video inter­view series avail­able on this web­site decided to ramp up the num­ber of client phone reviews.

So he did a cou­ple of things. First, he booked off every after­noon from 2 to 4 for tele­phone reviews.

And then he sat down with his assis­tant and said: “I’ve set aside 10 time slots each week for phone meet­ings, one at 2 and one at 3 each after­noon. “Your job is to fill those slots. Let’s talk about who you should approach about those meet­ings. And let’s talk about what needs to go out to clients in advance of those, an agenda, a pdf of their state­ment, any­thing else I want to refer to on the call.”

As a result of build­ing a key activ­ity into his rou­tine, he dra­mat­i­cally ramped up the num­ber of phone meet­ings with clients.

When you think about it, you can approach your week two ways. You can have desired activ­ity drive the struc­ture of your week. You can say each Mon­day What do I want to do this week and then fit it into your calendar.

Or you can have the struc­ture of your week drive your activ­ity. You can carve out the same hours each week to meet with staff and for phone meet­ings, client meet­ings and to con­tact prospects.

By putting these hours into your cal­en­dar and incor­po­rat­ing them into your rou­tine, you dra­mat­i­cally increase the chances of mak­ing high return activ­i­ties hap­pen. That doesn’t mean you can’t devi­ate from your sched­ule if some­thing more impor­tant comes up, but for most of us hav­ing a con­sis­tent rou­tine for at least part of our week will make us much more productive.

For more infor­ma­tion, please visit http://​www​.get​keep​clients​.com.


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Dan Richards | Comments Off


A Million Dollar Meeting Gone Wrong

Wednesday, May 25th, 2011

A mil­lion dol­lar meet­ing gone wrong

Land­ing a meet­ing with a prospec­tive client with a mil­lion dol­lars to invest doesn’t hap­pen every day — espe­cially when it results from a cold call.

But get­ting a chance to sit down is only the first step. Over lunch last week, a long-time friend who’s a part­ner with a down­town Toronto law described a recent meet­ing with a finan­cial advi­sor seek­ing his busi­ness and how some sub­tle errors and obvi­ous mis­takes cost the advi­sor the oppor­tu­nity to do business.

This lawyer has assets of well over $1 mil­lion — our con­ver­sa­tion offers a num­ber of impor­tant lessons for advisors.

The first relates to what it takes to get a meet­ing when you’re call­ing cold.

Cold call­ing to get meetings:

Here’s what the lawyer told me.

The orig­i­nal con­tact came a year ago from a guy call­ing on behalf of a bro­ker with one of the banks. The only rea­son that he got through orig­i­nally was that I get in early so when he called the first time at 7:30 I answered my phone. I blew him off, told him I was happy where I was — but he said he’d like to send me a report from his firm on the out­look for mar­kets regard­less. He also said he’d like to touch base in six months. I said sure, fig­ured I’ve never hear from him again — was a bit sur­prised when that report crossed my desk a week later”

“The same guy called me last fall at about the same time in the morn­ing, guess he’d fig­ured out when I get in — and I told him I still wasn’t inter­ested in meet­ing. And again he said that he under­stood, but would like to email me an arti­cle from For­tune Mag­a­zine that the bro­ker he works with has been send­ing clients on the out­look for the econ­omy and then touch base in about six months.”

“In March, I got another call — this time from the bro­ker him­self. I agreed to give him half an hour over a cof­fee” the lawyer said. “I was impressed by his low key man­ner on the phone and his per­sis­tence. My com­fort level went up when he told me that he dealt with a num­ber of lawyers and had been in the invest­ment indus­try for 20 years. And I actu­ally felt a bit of oblig­a­tion, given that I’d twice said his assis­tant could send me stuff and then he’d fol­lowed through both times.”

Take­aways on get­ting ini­tial meetings

The obvi­ous les­son is that when it comes to get­ting ini­tial meet­ings per­sis­tence pays.

But there are other lessons as well.

First, if you want to get through to busy peo­ple you have to find the time that they’re likely to pick up the phone — whether it be early in the day, later on after their assis­tant has left or on Sat­ur­day morn­ings. The only way to deter­mine this is through trial and error — and once you’ve had suc­cess once, you need to record this for the future.

Sec­ond, one way to build trust is by mak­ing offers that prospects find valu­able and then deliv­er­ing. Send­ing those reports and arti­cles helped build cred­i­bil­ity — if the per­son call­ing for this advi­sor had said “Just check­ing to see if you’re ready to buy yet”, while it cer­tainly would have shown per­sis­tence, it wouldn’t have cre­ated the same impe­tus to meet.

Finally, one of the keys to win­ning over prospects is demon­strat­ing patience. A crit­i­cal fac­tor to the suc­cess in secur­ing this meet­ing was how the calls were spaced out. If the per­son call­ing had made the same three calls a month apart, chances are he would have been seen as a pest rather than call­ing on behalf of some­one worth meeting.

A meet­ing that went wrong

The sec­ond set of lessons relate to how you man­age that ini­tial inter­ac­tion with a prospect.

The lawyer went on to talk about the meeting

We met at the Star­bucks under­neath my build­ing. He already had a cof­fee and a table when we got there — he rec­og­nized me from my photo on our firm’s web­site. On the phone he’d asked what kind of cof­fee I liked in case he got there first — and sure enough he had it wait­ing for me.

“Our con­ver­sa­tion began just fine. He thanked me for tak­ing the time to meet — said he’d like to learn a bit about my sit­u­a­tion and would be happy to answer any ques­tions I might have about markets.

“First he asked about how I was invest­ing cur­rently — I told him that I’d worked with a bro­ker in the past but for the past 10 years had been invest­ing on my own. He then asked about how I was invested currently.”

The lawyer paused and went on.

“At that point some­thing weird hap­pened. I have a habit of play­ing with my pen, this is some­thing I’ve always done.

As I was talk­ing about what I own right now, this guy picks up his pen and starts play­ing with it also.

Then when I crossed my legs he crossed his as well — and for the rest of our meet­ing, every time I did some­thing he did the same thing. Frankly, I didn’t know what exactly to think.

After about 15 min­utes, this guy says: ‘I appre­ci­ate your tak­ing the time today to talk. Let me tell you a bit about my back­ground and approach.”

The lawyer fin­ished our con­ver­sa­tion by repeat­ing this advisor’s con­clud­ing comments:

“From what you’ve told me, I do think that I might be able to add value to how you’re man­ag­ing money. As a next step, I’d like to sug­gest that we meet one lunch hour over a sand­wich at my office to review your cur­rent invest­ments in more detail — I’d be happy to give you an alter­na­tive point of view on what you’re doing right now. There would be no cost or oblig­a­tion for this.

My office is just a block away from here. I’m free a week from Fri­day and on Mon­day of the fol­low­ing week. Which of these two would work bet­ter for you?”

The lawyer wrapped us his sum­mary of the meeting:


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in My Practice | Comments Off